is the estimator a dpw employee? >> it's martin lee corporation. they are one of our as-needed cost estimators so it's not public works but they are on their own private -- >> third-party? >> yes. >> third-party. >> got it! do they offer, like, guarantees or their estimates and their product that they offer? >> uh-huh. no, un-- unfortunately, those are probably cost. it's not guaranteed because they are not contractors and a contractor's bid would be guaranteed. >> thank you. that was a question -- commissioner post was asking questions, about the 360 -- is the contract for 360 consecutive days so that's including weekends? >> consecutive dates, that's correct, yes. >> is there any language in the contract with the winning bidder regarding any, like, penalties if they go passed that timeline or are are there bonus features like if they finish earlier? >> no, there are no bonuses if they complete earlier but there's liquidated damages that we could assess on the contractor should they go beyond the 360 consecutive days in the contract. >> would that

you can invite them to e-mail our public works which is dpw a- atmosphere dpw dot org. there's a link on our website. if they want to follow up, they can approach it that way but i would also have them really encourage them to call 311 because that's the best way to learn over time about how we're providing services. >> thank you very much. those are my questions and comments. thank you again for your presentation. commissioner woolford? >> thank you so much for your report. i wanted to follow up on chair post's question about the two commissions and the one department. before, it was clear we had purview and we're here to support and look contractually across the non-sanitation sewer streets program. now that it's one again, it wasn't entirely apparent in the resolution where that division lay so i guess, i'm curious too, how best our commission is supporting dpw and is there any overlap? >> i think there is, as we said, there will be an opportunity for commissions to discuss how you want to interact with each other. the primary responsibility for sanitation and street

we do have sometimes pressure washing from dpw. what i don't understand sometime system like what i did not see in this presentation is there is a lack of coordination between the corridor workers and power washing with tlc provides basic cleaning for our neighborhood. i did in the see in the present anticipation, part from the joint calls that happened weekly that is continuing and appreciate that i did in the see strategic way of figure out how to support each other. that is one. the other thing i found and i do spoke to the corridor workers on and off and finds out that there is power wash happening from dpw sometimes on the sidewalk of tenderloin but no cord nigz with the corridor workers the purwash happens on the sidewalk all the trash gets on the streets. and then the corridor workers have to go in on coming traffic to pick up the trash. this is one concern i have. i don't know why there is no coordination. the kingsed thing is i would request if there is a way it increase the customer dover workers time like to work in the

this legislation does require dpw to come up with a sand management plan. we put down january we wanted it to be factored in the next budget. tell river more resource but i think the request for march sounds good to he. i would support that ma'am. do we finish them is a substantive amendment. sounds like we are changing between 1 of 23 to march 1 of 23 on page 7 line 11. that would be? no. pushing the dead line would not be substantive we could do that today. >> thank you, city attorney. >> anyone else on staff want to make comments about this? madam clerk. >> thank you, i'm checking. i upon upon don't see requests in the chat box. thank you. with that take public comment on this item y. are there members withhold like to spoke on item 1, approach the podium. and you can line up to your right notoriety curtains. those online listening remote press star 3 if you would like to speak you need to press it once you will hear the indication that you have been raised your hand. we are at 1 minute of comment. why before you start i had a 2 minute comment planned ca

supervisors are giving the dpw 60 days to explain the cost of the bathroom, as well as some of the departments other projects. >>> what a fun day. now to our other big story, fans is elevating impact bars across the bay area, today, as team usa delivered a thrilling victory, advancing to the next round of the world cup. let's head over for more on the big win, let's bring in vern glenn. i wonder what people are doing around 11:30 pick >> you know, i saw it and i could not believe it. especially that second half, it was like oh my, will they hang on? son of a gun, they did. a couple of tournaments, they get by the first one unbeaten, and is now it is all about the second one. this would be the knockout round. let's roll it up, here. usa elements everywhere. fans dressed as elders, lady liberty against iran in white, christian pulisic, his first world cup goal at the 38th minute. jewels, look, he paid for it. in pain after the collision with the goalie. did not return e air for saturday with an abdominal injury. 98 minutes, this is the best one, ball by the goalie, but walker zimmerman was there

>> the news racks contract is with dpw. i'll try to explain it. it was a result of judicial (indiscernible) publishers sued the city for the rights to distribute their newspapers. the city issued an rfp for a company to come in, put the capital, so there would be a uniform stand and different things for, so wind and things would not blow them over the street so we won that rfp and add menstruating that. >> i'm saying -- it's telling me here though both -- this contract and it sounds like the news rack contract are both expiring. >> this amendment would take it through 2027, so that's this one and the news rack contract will expire in october of 2024. >> understood. >> but so -- i suspect that will not get renewed based on what happened with technology and how media is consumed so it's going to run its course but it's like a three-legged stool. the dpw and publisher and clear channel have a stake in the contract. >> i think, chair ronen, i think because this is a reduced payment and it's rather large amount of reduced payments while over $50, i und

so we're working with dpw for approval that are coming through with these spaces so we can align with our processes and continue out reach with our permit holders about their next steps for the transition. we plan to give you more update on this on the 20th of december, along with a proposal for any special hearings that might be needed. we may be able to nannage these with regularly scheduled hearings. but we'll keep you posted here as we get informed projections around the volume of regular agenda applications. next update is around next year free program. this was a legislative program that began a year ago and it technically was said to end on october 31. but it was extended just recently to june 30, 2023, so just refresher on this one, this is a program that waved initial application and license fees for new businesses that were starting that were in the last year. so we were able to waive entertainment permit application and annual license fees for this program. amended ordinance also expands eligibility for businesses to increase the gross receipts for a business to qualify for

this is why we did research all overnight country talked to workers of dpw to talk to everyone we could, business ordinance and when we did was listened to all of the feedback and created prop b the voters passed by 66%. stake a d. sanitation and streets to be focussed on getting streets cleaned it may cost 7 million dollars extra if this means we have better oversight and have people rung dpw and department of san fragz qualified do that work e elimination corruption special we can get our streets clean that 7 upon million dollars off of a 14 bilgsz is worth temperature tour sxichl small businesses and the revitalization of city dependses on us succeeding at this . give sanitation a shot it is about to launch. lynch to the voters and if it does not work then change temperature this new prop b removes many of the protections against corruption as well as destroying the new d. i'm supporting prospect b. giving voters an opportunity to look at something that will cost needlessly 7 million dollars. one observation i made in city government and when we see with the drug policies. i think it

and i have a weekly phone call i had to demand that i have with the dpw bhorn is not the project manager. there is no project manager assigned to that site to figure out how to fast track any piece of it or put pressure on it to open it up faster because without a crisis diversion center, which is the mental health sf service center requires they create. it is at least the next best thing, is not going to open for a year and a half, at best. that's what is happening with this site temperature is insane you guys, insane. >> thank you supervisor ronen. >> supervisor melgar. >> thank you president walton. i am a believer in supporting the supervisor for the district you know, whatever they want to do in their district. for this one i'm torn. ambivalent for a couple reasons. one is when we were all here on christmas eve, you know talking about this; i did mote with a bunch of the constituents in the tenderloin. and in this linkage center was one of their upon demands. it was their idea to have i place where people could take a shower and all of that. i met with the same people you know this

project is not on the dpw website. nothing here demonstrates this work has independent utility it refers to traffic changes due to closure of great highway a decision not made at this time. the skoechl work suggest this is is department on closing great highway south of sloat. impact of this project new traffic signals at skyline and sloat and great highway and the west side transportation project should be studied. i question what coordination and public out reach occurred here well is also a street light issue on sloat 45 and 46th someone should fix. address my points and direct me to the best staff person to contact. if victoria is the person to start with i will start with her. thank you. i hope that was clear. thanks. >> mr. lamb are there more speakers in the queue? that completes our queue >> public comment is closed. mr. pillpel i suggest you contact victoria chan if there is no comments i will make a motion to sends this to the full board with positive recommendation. >> on that motion to forward this to the b

set aside in our, fy23 and 24 bumming et cetera, 16er 0,000 for work words for dpw for street cleanings, specifically around shelters. we also set aside 150,000 for work order to proper lea dress encampments and providing the necessary support for people who are in our shelters and close to 300,000 for work order with the police department to provide realtime support to make shelters and plat forms a safer place. thank you. >> got a question. i'm going to do a quick summary and then we welcome the questions, is that okay sir. >> not really but go ahead. >> to be clear this is not a new agreement this was an existing agreement that was negotiated back in 2007, however we realize that there are financial challenges and therefore looking to amend the agreement. so under the second amendment, there would be a reduction on mag payment to port so that would be reduced on estimated 2.9 million initially under the existing agreement to 1.4 million but city wide there will be a increase in the daily maintenance. 6 million dollars capitol investment and sfmt a would have full assets where under t

hsh and hsa and dpw. d ph took over the center as of july first. but i really want to note this was part of a larger strategy in a multipronged plan to stabilize the neighborhood with the goals of reducing over dose deaths. as well as making important contributions to people's health. as you remarked the tenderloin center is serving 400 people per day. 7 days a week at 1170 market in un plaza. so we wanted to share some of our key what we believe the key impacts and service. you cited some this is from last week. we have placed approximately 1,000 individuals or connect them with shelter and 211 connected with permanent housing. approximately, 637 people have completed enrollment to cal fresh, medical and encap. we provided 8,000 showers. more than 3,000 loads of laundry. over 25,000 on site behavioral, physical and social service connections. you remarked 280 over doses reversed which is left week's data. more than 300 individuals have been connected with special behavioral health service. >> as you all also remarked and thanks to a fantastic team

joined by monica of sfmta and we have gregory with dpw on the phone. >> great. >> we prepared a few visuals. >> great. >> good evening. robin with the share's spaces program. very wonder to feel be with you in person and back at the excision that has i think come out and supported us in the most engaged. we will start by giving an update on where the program is, how many caseses we have in with regard to the on going transition to a post pandemic program. a little bit on how we have been handling education and out reach. information on resources and grant and applications that are open. and questions and answers. we don't -- always acknowledge everyone on the team we wanted take a moment tonight to -- put faces to the names some commissioners, ortiz in peculiar are out in community all the time seeing them and helping us put together out reach events and so -- salutations from the team. >> so, earlier this summer program accepted permit applications for post pandemic legislative permits. we begun to eventualize the share of the case load that our team manages that are specific to those seek

and by the rules of dpw they did not want bike parking in the space to facilitate loading. moved the 2 other bike parking space are moved to other yaroslavsky of the campus weville bicycle parking just not on california street. >> you you confirm the building that will being demolished does in the provide the rear yard. thereupon is no additional impact onment absense of the. roar yard >> that is correct existing building does in the have a rear yard and the roariard we are proposing is on the same level as the existing buildings roof. should be no impact or change to neighboring buildings. you are provoire diring a rear terrace that is light and sun coming from the south and to the rear yard you tell mote buildings facing washington street. >> this is correct we reduced the impact the year wrooer rear your and i glass partition from 6 to 10 feet they can have sound. would you be able to previously comment on the [inaudible] sequence. i had a call the other day asking the entrance as shown would be able to access given the fact the down sloping to get in the school require

emergency management and staff in the lop and even dpw since they all might have some assistance in the event there is a fire event in the future in the central subway. on prop l, i deponent disagree with the objective analysis and discussion but encourage voters to read the arguments in the voter information care low including mine and others. and make up their own minds about prospect well<,>. on the valencia project. director yekutiel asked a question and wondering as a matter of law can the direct be involved in any part of that or does he have a conflict and should be advised not to ask questions about that project because that might have the actual appearance of influencing a decision if he has a conflict. nothing against director yekutiel want to be clear on the rules relative to conflict of interests. and final low director tumlin wants to mention a twu event. last saturday that some of us were at. thank you very much. >> thank you. next caller. this is barry toronto. i'm calling regarding the fact that chair borden is in the here and impact the decision regard being item then.