dr gina yeah i agree i agree with him there we found consensus based you so much holiday the new host of the big picture might i add and dr jane aloud and thank you as always. thank you. our team is editor in chief margaret us the money and addressed attacks on our teams reputation and advertising activities here in the united states door and you don't know women till recently no active measures except those targeting our reputation has been taken against us in the u.s. pacific really nowhere else have we ever experienced the kind of pressure that we experienced today in the u.s. to the point eventually being forced out of the country. to make it look as if we've done something obscure shady illegal which is of close. to succumb to us with that proposal before the election they showed us a presentation of the obvious told us how much it would cost and we agreed and today our team was recently pulled from the you tube add list here in the united states without any notice. and another terror group in syria has suffered another major blow just a day after russia's defense ministry said t

loudon and hello to both of you thanks for being with me tonight dr gina i'd like to start with you you're a second amendment supporter the conversation though isn't about taking away the second amendment rather what is wrong with what could possibly be wrong with adding maybe just supplemental language to the amendment to perhaps prevent the sale of this type of high powered rifle. it sounds so good on its face and i understand why people are frantically searching for solutions but unfortunately when we're when we're operating in the realm of reactionary behavior it's often important to step back and consider what we're really doing and what we're really talking about doing is shifting the argument from blaming the person the evil that committed this atrocity to blaming an inanimate object tantamount to blaming a car for example that can drive into a crowd of people so then if we're going to ban what made that inanimate object kill more people are we going to ban fast cars for example because they can rev up fast and bang into a crowd of people much faster we have to really think a

loudon she is a psychology expert and host of america trends with dr gina all right in fact that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it lionel let me go to you first i've been watching you on social media. you've been covering this topic a quite extensively. the thing that i draw from it is i understand what people do in hollywood ok people buy and sell themselves ok i don't think that's a really big story but i what i really so totally disappointed with but probably also expected is that you know when they when you're on the right side of the barricade you're vilified you're destroyed you're buried you're forgotten but if you're friends of the powers that be the elites you give almost a free pass people oh i didn't know about it it's terrible ok and then they let it go it's so unfair and it's such a double standard go ahead lionel. and two thousand and five this brain trust called and i disagree they are not the left they are not liberals are not progressive they're just hollyweird but in two thousand five years ago they resurrected at conversation a private

loudon she is a psychology expert and host of america trends with dr gina all right in fact that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it line to let me go to you first i've been watching you on social media you've been covering this topic of quite extensively. this is the thing that i draw from it is i understand what people do in hollywood ok people buy and sell themselves ok i don't think that's a really big story but i what i really so totally disappointed with but probably also expected is that you know when they when you're on the right side of the barricade you're vilified you're destroyed you're buried you're forgotten but if you're friends of the powers that be of the elites you give most a free pass people oh i didn't know about it it's terrible ok and then they let it go it's so unfair and it is such a double standard go ahead lionel. and two thousand and five this brain trust called and i disagree they are not the left they are not liberals are not progressive they're just hollyweird but in two thousand five years ago they resurrected a conversation

host you often see in political panel discussions here but she missed a job is the doctor part of dr gina and it's about the psychology and parenting implications of living digital and as for the societal implications what more need i say than author and social commentator lionel thank you both for stepping into the big picture here's a snapshot of your life in the digital age do the math we spend half a day twelve hours consuming media often multiple media simultaneously jayna kids today are growing up digital we have to ask them to help us with our devices the world isn't their friend or tips but when everything is on demand do children's critical thinking skills atrophy. they can certainly there's no question about that and there are other skills at risk to think about it like this you said you know you're having trouble remembering when the last time you used a fax machine was a what life was like before there was a fax machine and there could be that perhaps the reason is because you can just go check it out by any vehicle search engine that you'd like to use it so the fact that we h

. >> shannon: joining a snuffer reaction, dr. gina lowden.nd executive and resident at american university school of public affairs. good to see you both. >> good to be here. >> good to be with you. >> shannon: it's a nice night here in d.c. too. i asked my newer day said it would be unleashing a reign of terror. the president doesn't step in on this. they had that little dinner. chuck schumer was over there. when he came out and they come out and said basically there was a deal, the right freaked out. the president has now said we will do a deal on dreamers but here the 70 things i will need from you including the border wall. where do we go from here? if there's a number of provisions and my understanding, democrats and republicans can come together. for example, e-verify. the issue of the wall was something democrats were talking about 2013. if you're focusing on some of those things as opposed to ripping families apart, i think there's concern about what may happen as far as cracking down on on accompanied minors for example. that's prett

. >> shannon: joining a snuffer reaction, dr. gina lowden. executive and resident at american university school of public affairs. good to see you both. >> good to be here. >> good to be with you. >> shannon: it's a nice night here in d.c. too. i asked my newer day said it would be unleashing a reign of terror. the president doesn't step in on this. they had that little dinner. chuck schumer was over there. when he came out and they come out and said basically there was a deal, the right freaked out. the president has now said we will do a deal on dreamers but here the 70 things i will need from you including the border wall. where do we go from here? if there's a number of provisions and my understanding, democrats and republicans can come together. for example, e-verify. the issue of the wall was something democrats were talking about 2013. if you're focusing on some of those things as opposed to ripping families apart, i think there's concern about what may happen as far as cracking down on on accompanied minors for example. that's pretty

henry kaufman, gina martin adams are still with us. dr. kaufman, if i could come to you first. anticipating this january 3 regulatory deadline and what it will mean for investment banks, but not just for the sell side but for the buy side as well. what does this mean in your world? dr. kaufman: i really think independence of research is a very difficult situation to achieve. experience my own dating back many years, those who are the head of research have to really work very hard. the people working under them right objectively without interference. otherwise, if you do not protect the objective nest of research and it becomes known in the research.sell side that is not a thing to do for any firm, but it has been done and it is done when it comes to underwriting securities, the ability to transmit them to investors, but if you want research to do a job for you, you must protect the objectivity . if you cannot protect the objectivity the value of research diminishes. nejra: part of the point of these roles is to have more transparency by unbundling those research costs. do you t