much more comfortable with crops generated through a systemic approach dr hansen and the dean at the end of misuse school of agriculture as you see in the sea mail are trying to say that their chili will not be considered a g.m.o. in the european union and other countries that ban or curtail their use they make this argument despite laws that clearly say the systemic approach like the one m.m.s. use using is in fact creating a genetically modified organism. doctors sara laney from the university of kahn in france has helped shape european policy towards genetically modified organisms called the european union and hundred fifty countries around the world the definition of goods here no is not the matter where the gene comes from it is a matter of genes ninety five vitro in its you know the backbone of the origin of the gene what is clear is that more than one hundred countries around the world may require all chili from new mexico to be tested for genetic engineering or even bar imports from u.s. farmers out right this burgeoning resistance to genetically modified organisms results as

much more comfortable with the crops generated through a systemic approach dr hansen and the dean at the enemy su school of agriculture as you see in the sea mail are trying to say that there chile will not be considered a g.m.o. in the european union and other countries that ban or curtail their use they make this argument despite laws that clearly say the systemic approach like the one m.m.s. use using is in fact creating a genetically modified organism. doctors sara laney from the university of conn in france has helped to shape european policy towards genetically modified organisms called the european union and four hundred fifty countries around the world the definition of goods here no is not a matter where the gene comes from it's a matter of gene being modified to vitro in its you know the backbone of the origin of the gene what is clear is that more than one hundred countries around the world may require all chili from new mexico to be tested for genetic engineering or even bar imports from u.s. farmers out right this burgeoning resistance to genetically modified organisms r

much more comfortable with crops generated through a systemic approach dr hansen and the dean at the end a mess you school of agriculture as you see in the sea mail or trying to say that there chile will not be considered a g.m.o. in the european union and other countries that ban or curtail their use they make this argument despite laws that clearly say the systemic approach like the one m.m.s. use using is in fact creating a genetically modified organism. doctors eal sarah laney from the university of conn in france has helped to shape european policy towards genetically modified organisms called a european union and four hundred fifty countries around the world the definition of a g.m. no it's not a matter where the gene comes from it's a matter of gene being modified to vitro in its you know the backbone of the origin of the gene what is clear is that more than one hundred countries around the world may require all chile from new mexico to be tested for genetic engineering or even bar imports from u.s. farmers out right this burgeoning resistance to genetically modified organisms

much more comfortable with crops generated through a systemic approach dr hansen and the dean at the end a misuse school of agriculture as you see in the c. mail are trying to say that there chili will not be considered a g.m.o. in the european union and other countries that ban or curtail their use they make this argument despite laws that clearly say the systemic approach like the one m.m.s. use using is in fact creating a genetically modified organism. doctors yale sarah laney from the university of conn in france has helped shape european policy towards genetically modified organisms called a european union and hundred fifty countries around the world the definition of goods here no it's not a matter where the gene comes from it's a matter of gene being modified vitro in its you know the backbone of the origin of the gene what is clear is that more than one hundred countries around the world may require all chile from new mexico to be tested for genetic engineering or even bar imports from u.s. farmers out right this burgeoning resistance to genetically modified organisms results

of biotech giants and the public regulatory agencies that are supposed to oversee them despite dr hansen's assertions the safety of genetically modified crops cannot be known because there has never been a long term independent food safety study of even one single g.m.o. even the data collected by the corporations is kept secret from the public this is the same arrangement that gave rise to claims that as best d.d.t. and cigarettes were safe. the panda owner can determine what those crops can be used for and they have expressively the biotech corporations that expressly forbidden. use or testing these for scientific purposes this from the scientific american under threat of litigation scientists cannot test to see to explore the different conditions under which it thrives or fails they cannot compare seeds from one company against those from another company and perhaps most important. they cannot examine whether the genetically modified crops lead to unintended environmental side effects at the university of con in france stuck to sarah leni could not abide the legal secrecy and began an i

of biotech giants and the public regulatory agencies that are supposed to oversee them despite dr hansen's assertions the safety of genetically modified crops cannot be known because there has never been a long term independent food safety study of even one single g.m.o. even the data collected by the corporations is kept secret from the public this is the same arrangement that gave rise to claims that asbestos d.d.t. and cigarettes were safe. the panda owner can determine what those crops can be used for and they have expressively the biotech corporations that expressly forbidden. use or testing these for scientific purposes this from the scientific american under threat of litigation scientists cannot test to see to explore the different conditions under which it thrives or fails they cannot compare seeds from one company against those from another company and perhaps most important. they cannot examine whether the genetically modified crops lead to unintended environmental side effects at the university of con in france stuck to sarah leni could not abide the legal secrecy and began an

of biotech giants and the public regulatory agencies that are supposed to oversee them despite dr hansen's assertions the safety of genetically modified crops cannot be known because there has never been a long term independent food safety study of even one single g.m.o. even the data collected by the corporations is kept secret from the public this is the same arrangement that gave rise to claims that as best d.d.t. and cigarettes were safe. the panda owner can determine what those crops can be used for and they have expressively the biotech corporations have expressively forbidden. use or testing these for scientific purposes this from the scientific american under threat of litigation scientists cannot test to see to explore the different conditions under which it thrives or fails they cannot compare seeds from one company against those from another company and perhaps most important. they cannot examine whether the genetically modified crops lead to unintended environmental side effects at the university of con in france stuck to sarah leni could not abide the legal secrecy and began a

of biotech giants and the public regulatory agencies that are supposed to oversee them despite dr hansen's assertions the safety of genetically modified crops cannot be known because there has never been a long term independent food safety study of even one single g.m.o. even the data collected by the corporations is kept secret from the public this is the same arrangement that gave rise to claims that as best d.d.t. and cigarettes were safe. the panda owner can determine what those crops can be used for and they have expressively the biotech corporations that expressively forbidden. use or testing these for scientific purposes this from the scientific american under threat of litigation scientists cannot test to see to explore the different conditions under which it thrives or fails they cannot compare seeds from one company against those from another company and perhaps most important. they cannot examine whether the genetically modified crops lead to unintended environmental side effects at the university of con in france stuck to sarah leni could not abide the legal secrecy and began a

gulf oil spill dr james hansen former director of nasa as goddard institute for space studies and one of america's top climate scientists as said that the extraction use of tar sands oil is essentially game over for the climate we need to be taking the actions necessary to save our planet now not further destroy it call your members of congress and tell them to urge the obama administration to just say no to the keystone x.l. pipeline and that's the way it is tonight tuesday july thirtieth two thousand and thirteen and don't forget democracy begins with you you know their get active tag you're it. is it possible to navigate the economy with all the details and specifics and misinformation and media hype so keep you up to date by decoding the mainstream status if in your mind. i would rather as questions for people in positions of power instead of speaking on their behalf and that's why you can find my show larry king now right here on our t.v. question more. after eight weeks of testimony inside a military courtroom bradley manning is acquitted on the most serious charge of aiding the

gulf oil spill dr james hansen former director of nasa as goddard institute for space studies and one of america's top climate scientists as said that the extraction use of tar sands oil is essentially game over for the climate we need to be taking the actions necessary to save our planet now not further destroy it call your members of congress and tell them to urge the obama administration to just say no to the keystone x.l. pipeline and that's the way it is tonight tuesday july thirtieth two thousand and thirteen and don't forget democracy begins with you you know they're good active tag you're it. mission. critical should be free. for charges free to make amends three. three. priests. mostly blank video for your media projects a free media. wealthy british. market. find out what's really happening to the global economy. for a no holds barred global financial headlines kaiser reports. more news today. island says once again flared up. these are the images crowbar ladies and seeing from history that canada. china corporations are all day. today on larry king now a school winner jeff