its decision citing the disturbing level of monetary interests influencing the science and as dr michael hansen

beef supply i'm joined now by dr michael hansen senior scientist at consumer union thank you so much for coming on michael. you're welcome to be here so dr hansen for those that don't know can you. start by giving a brief overview of the symptoms of c.j.d. what does the human body and where does the disease originate. variant c.j.d. variant c.j.d. or v c.j.d. is what supposedly. caused by eating meat from cows that have been infected with mad cow disease but it is a disease of the central nervous system and particularly the brain that's where you see the symptoms the. spongiform basically means sponge like so it's a disease that causes functionally holes in the brain and. people have different a they sort of become they can't move or they make jerky movements there's a range of symptoms but it's an invariably fatal disease and how does it originate in cattle today and how widespread it is that both domestically and globally well they don't really know there was this outbreak of you know b.s.e. that happened in the european union in the united kingdom spread to europe it spread to the

its decision citing the disturbing level of monetary interests influencing the science and as dr michael hansen a senior scientist at consumers union in guest on this show said last year there's only three reasons to retract a paper. one clear evidence that the findings are unreliable due to misconduct that is data fabrication or honest error to plagiarism or redundant publication three on ethical research and the letter that the editor of food and chemical toxicology dr wallace has sent to dr sara lee mean they admitted that they found no problem with plagiarism on ethical research or data fabrication now thankfully the work of these scientists to bring to light the disturbing story of the surliness study has not gone unnoticed in fact after an extensive review process in which the paper passed no less than the really rounds of peer reviews the study was republished last month in the journal environmental sciences europe dr michael and to new molecular geneticists in london even one as far as saying that quote few studies would survive such intense scrutiny by fellow scientists the paper even

its decision citing the disturbing level of monetary interests influencing the science and as dr michael hansen a senior scientist at consumers union in guest on this show said last year there's only three reasons to retract a paper one clear evidence that the findings are unreliable due to misconduct that is data fabrication or honest error to plagiarism or redundant publication three on ethical research and the letter that the editor of food and chemical toxicology dr wallace has sent to dr sara lee mean they admitted that they found no problem with plagiarism on ethical research or data fabrication now thankfully the work of these scientists to bring to light the disturbing story of the surliness study has not. unnoticed in fact after an extensive review process and which the paper passed no less than three rounds of peer reviews the study was republished last month in the journal environmental sciences europe dr michael and a new molecular geneticist in london even went as far as saying that quote few studies would survive such intense scrutiny by fellow scientists the paper even went to gr

its decision citing the disturbing level of monetary interests influencing the science and as dr michael hansen a senior scientist at consumers union and guest on this show said last year there's only three reasons to retract a paper one clear evidence that the findings are unreliable due to misconduct that is data fabrication or honest error to plagiarism or redundant publication three on ethical research and the letter that the editor of food and chemical toxicology dr wallace has sent to dr sara lee mean they admitted that they found no problem with plagiarism on ethical research or data fabrication now thankfully the work of these scientists to bring to light the disturbing story of the surliness study has not gone unnoticed in fact after an extensive review process and which the paper passed no less than the really rounds of peer reviews. the study was republished last month in the journal environmental sciences europe dr michael and a new molecular geneticist in london even went as far as saying that quote few studies would survive such intense scrutiny by fellow scientists the paper even