in one thousand nine hundred to dr ralph ben straight the university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into amounts. are gone all the main risk issues here is that ninety five percent of all competent scientists in these fields are working for the produces side and only five percent are the genuinely independent. there's not a lot of science that says transgenic fish is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks at there's a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if the transgenic fish escapes what kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish population don't know what this might do to us or our children or our children's children in our congress here in the united states or our legislatures throughout the world we vote all these different laws tax laws and corporate laws what could be more important than deciding on the permanent genetic future of life on earth. watching r.t. the introduction of a smartphone made a tremendous impact on the way people use mo

this is this is an interesting slide would do what you have here in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph ben straight the university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a mouse. and he did just that he actually was successful as you can see though the very large mouse here is the one that is successfully been engineered with human growth genes to make it huge and you see the sibling next to it and this made a huge fear it was on the front page of these magazines new york times and then a few months later people said well this is interesting but what are you can really do with a really huge mouse i mean you can scare people you know there's a few things you can do with it but it's not a very practical thing to have a really huge mouse so then what happened is. you know this is the kind of agriculture said well what happens if we were to use the same experiment but to use it with pig. and. so i went out to the u.s.d.a. here. and this is what they did they took the human growth gene dr vern purcell with taxpayer dollars and

and nine hundred eighty two dr ralph minster at the university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a mouse. drawn all the main risk issues what's next is that ninety five percent of all competent scientists in these fields are verkin for the produce aside and only five percent are read genuinely independent. there is not a lot of science that says train genic fish is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks at there is a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if it transgenic fish escapes what kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish population i don't know what this might do to us or our children or our children's children in our congress here in the united states legislatures throughout the world we vote all these different laws tax laws and corporate laws what can be more important than deciding on the feminine genetic future of the. life on earth. and i. think we. have a special now we says where mr valiantly learned of young she looked out of

in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph mainstreet university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a mouse. gone all the main risk issues let's get to ninety five percent of all competent scientists indy's feel it's our version for the producers site and only five percent. read genuinely independent. there's not a lot of science that says train genic fish is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks at there's a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if it transgenic fish escape some kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish population i don't know what this might do to us or our children or our children strangers in our congress here in the united states legislatures throughout the world we vote all these different laws tax laws and corporate laws what could be more important than deciding on the permanent genetic future of life on earth. all. in the czech republic she's available in. central europe. most full stop aida which are based in bosnia and

in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph brin strip university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into amounts. on all the main risk issues posed next to me is that ninety five percent of all competent scientists in these fields are working for the produces side and only five percent. of the genuinely independent. there's not a lot of science that says train genic fish is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks at there is a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if it transgenic fish escapes what kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish population i don't know what this might do to us or our children or.