this is this is an interesting slide would do what you have here in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph ben straight the university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a mouse. and he did just that he actually was successful as you can see though the very large mouse here is the one that is successfully been engineered with human growth genes to make it huge and you see the sibling next to it and this made a huge fear it was on the front page of these magazines new york times and then a few months later people said well this is interesting but what are you can really do with a really huge mouse i mean you can scare people you know there's a few things you can do with it but it's not a very practical thing to have a really huge mouse so then what happened is. you know this is the kind of agriculture said well what happens if we were to use the same experiment but to use it with pig. and. so i went out to the u.s.d.a. here. and this is what they did they took the human growth gene dr vern purcell with taxpayer dollars and i k

in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph ben straight university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a mouse. drawn all the main risk issues . is that ninety five percent of all competent scientists. indy's fears are ripping for the producers side and only five percent are really genuinely independent. there's not a lot of science that says strange and if this is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks out there is a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if a transgenic fish escapes what kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish population don't know what this might do to us or our children or our children's children in our congress here in the united states or our legislatures throughout the world we vote all these different laws tax laws and corporate laws what could be more important than deciding on the permanent genetic future of life on earth. culture is the same i understand marley and therefore you will misunderstand be at least five ye

in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph ben street university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a mouse. on all the main risk issues was that there is a ninety five percent of all competent scientists in these fields are working for the producers side and only five percent are really genuinely independent. there's not a lot of science that says train genic fish is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks at there's a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if a transgendered fish escapes what kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish population i don't know why.

in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph ben straight the university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a mouse. drawn all the main risk issues all genetic and there is a ninety five percent of all competent scientists in these fields are verkin for that produces site and only five percent. lead genuinely independent. there is not a lot of science that says train genic fish is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks at there is a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if a transgenic fish escapes what kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish moderation i don't know what this might do the us or our children or our children's children in our congress here in the united states legislatures throughout the will be vote all these different laws tax laws and corporate laws what could be more important than deciding on the feminine genetic future of life on earth. gems the official antti outlook a show. called touch from the. life on the go. video on