that the dr requesters and it is lower in height than the dr requester if there's my question about that the architect mr. learner is come up and part of the approval will be 8 and a half inches lower to take care of discretion in murray that might occur to that keeps that in place are there other speaker in opposition talked about private views that are not protected and added concerns about impacts foundation impacts from construction for the department of building inspection and as also the builder is liable to not effect any of the adjacent properties but that's not before us there's a lot to support most of names were read so it's a huge amount of neighborhood support they've provided a 5 foot set back all the way around most of the top of the floor and the process and light wells meet the standards that the residential design team is requesting now the rear yards extension the existing property is shorter so it is only conforming to what's there if it's taking away any of the so-called yard it was the province of this this the others have capacity into this area it's up to the zoni

tracey representing the dr requester maria the owner the adjacent property to the east of the project you have our brief so i'll be short and leave time for the lady herself 3 consecutive points a variance inform the side yard encroachment and the project sponsor hats not met the requirement as we pointed out and the variance decision it pending the project sponsor has not - we submit in the the project sponsor can't have it both ways incorporated either there's extraordinary circumstances if not then if not the variance it be denied and if so the discretionary review is properly filled the modifications were done to accommodate artist neighborhood to the ante no such accumulation has been made for the lady now she'll address the commission with the remaining time. >> thank you my name is a maria gonzales the owner which is the property adjacent to this thing in question here anyway when was i first approached and invite about the drilling and evasion what kind of drilling and problems causing to the structure to my structure the homes are very close together and so i was afraid you k

of the years and the neighbors is casting shadows onto the subject property we believe that the dr requester has views from his windows we'll be blocking with additional footage so in conclusion we would like to to respectfully request that the dr be denied. >> thank you. >> thank you other members of the public who wish to speak in support of project sponsor. >> okay. seeing none dr requester you have a two minute rebuttal. >> i'm actually going to just continue what i was trying to say the communication one of the major concerns it's inadequate because what you have here okay by the way, you have a full bathroom i don't know how that is on the main floor i don't know how that got done but what we have here if you see this area you have a the 2 floors but this area here you have the stairs going down yet they're going to have this be the last floor and if you go to the sections you'll find out that i don't know just - uh-huh if you go to the sections you'll photo there is a basement floor and fwlarg and beyond that garage floor this is renovated i know this because i looked at the plans and

says it's a massive square footage that the dr requesters and it is lower in height than the dr requester if there's my question about that the architect mr. learner is come up and part of the approval will be 8 and a half inches lower to take care of discretion in murray

appropriate and it will not be exceptional public works i'm happy to answer any questions. >> dr requester our team has 5 minutes. >> good afternoon, commissioners and wanting i'm the dr in principle we have to outlooks we question in usage from the church to residential rather we are objecting to the proposal i am not an aukt architect but want to put it in context i disagree because the compatibility with the exception of one obtain this on and on building on the income tax 0 they're capable and sizings no proportions including the size and spacing looking at the design guidelines page 15 for side spacing we're expect the pattern the side facing the one the adjacent building projects must respect the spacing now in the dr full analysis page six the collect list the site design it says night to the applicable i don't understand how it every building as signed positioning so it didn't respect that and the foitsz lot 14, 12 and 11 the side spacing between the building by design the project ignores the guidelines and the impacts object the building number one loss of light number 2 encroachi

. >> i'm concerned the dr requester didn't show up which is kind of odd i'll favor a continuance because i be i'd like to at least see if we can get the dr requester to come here and perhaps the project sponsors could try to work further with the dr requester to see if there's a way to resolve her retainedcy situation and see if we want to leave the kitchen in it or not and it becomes a simpler thing i'll make a motion i'll see if i get a second. >> i wasn't aware it was continued i'm going to probably support the motion the dr requester didn't come and i wonder how mafltd she is. >> let me just comment so this is an unusual one i'm sympathetic you're trying to live out the wishes but the dr requester is not here we have no idea of their complaint and maybe a legitimate reason they're not here so i'll support a continuance i understand that commissioner richards position on this i like our energy on it i'd rather take that energy and fight when a bigger issue and maybe a project will come up i'm a little bit torn there is so many unusual pieces i'm not sure we have make a full judgment s

. >> so dr requester our team has a 5 minute presentation. >> can i get the slides. >> yes. >> when start speaking sfgovtv will bring them up for you. >> outlook good afternoon, commissioners andrew peterson representing the dr requester team they've failed to comply with the set back and an extraordinary circumstances be granted a surveillance to continue the design guidelines our question to the commission what extraordinary circumstances give this project special treatment navigate to the residential guidelinesism are extraordinary and exceptional and the projects current plan will harm the existing neighborhoods asia existing character first 312 green tripled the area on the smallest block incompatible with the existing buildings they're a 8 and a half block and among the smallest on the block the proposed changes would create nearly 3 square feet descender than it's neighboring neighbors this falls outside the density range of the block what justifies this inappropriate elements that have avoided the parcel to a did he give to adhere to the guidelines it should respect the buildings

numbers ambassador transposed the second the packet identified the project and the project the dr requesters and the project sponsors property so i brought corrected maps which i will - and lastly the e-mails i'll handout in opposition to the project since the packet went out last week i'll pass those along and refer to those in my presentation case 2014 dot 139 request for a discretionary review for the second story edition above the sister-in-law family house the project includes a small twrt set backs 15 feet from the property line and 16 from the north and 2 and a half from the rear property line on the west side of lake street between delmar and like many blocks it is deseconded by on a additional in the wraer portions of most of the lots since the packets were sent the department got e-mails both prove or disprove behind the subject property for the second-story rear it is from diane on lake street the property immediately adjacent to the north the subject project ms. youngest concerns the second-story additional clouds the privacy and light and detracts from accident style off the nei

in port of the project seeing none, dr requester you have two minutes rebuttal >> okay quickly this is a subject property this is the garage this is the four foot guardrail there's from the garbage up 12 feet this is 4 feet this is about up to here okay. this prove or disprove has opted submitted this prove or disprove opposed unable to make it don't think they supported this property owner didn't speak english you heard from the prove or disprove that opposes it the property next to the north vacant under contradiction everyone that lives in this area opposes this don't be fooled by the number of people here today, in fact, as a representation it's not a popper o popular project in terms of scaling i want you to understand what we're dealing with here this is cam ills bedroom the 11-year-old this is calling all going to be gone this is her sole light and air to her bedroom we're not going to have them this is was there is now minimal when we add on 8 more feet and solid building it's not a liveable space i think the family deserves t it if we care of open space and not allow a project

. >> so you should tomato take up the matter both the dr requester has asked. >> we have a number of public comment cards sorry i can't read this handwringing. >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and commissioners my name is michael i'm the dr filer i'm a resident of the at 47927 of the in the historic district in addition i'm a preservation architect practicing thirty years in san francisco i come to this hearing with professional knowledge we respectfully request the continuance for the hearing the documents you have in front of you have been known to be inaccurate i've informed the planning department of this problem and through a couple of communications i've referred an actual photograph the in front of the building referencing some data lines across this here very easy to see what the design and size of the building the relationship between the two knows nothing happened we have done a little sketch showing inaccuracy i'm going to move over this is is not quite large enough this dimension is inaccurate but over 3 feet and it's very easy to see and it favors the developm

drs. and if a request to a dr is made to the planning commission, and it is denied unanimously, by a list of commissioners including commissioner moore, you can be sure that they did not make a case that satisfied her standard. so, i would also like to answer the question about the door in the rear. that door provides the only access to the upper level of the house. so i did not hear anything from the appellants that would merit any change of a project of 125 square foot change from the current building with the two-foot extension in the rear. >> i never have worked a project this small. and i have been working on these projects for a long time. i have never seen one come forward this small, thank you. >> mr. sanchez? >> thank you, scott san shes, planning department, the discretionary review hearing was held in april, 2014, 24th, and to my knowledge and from what i can find and any of the ement mails this was first each brought to my attention on saturday with an e-mail from miss smith don't have any e-mails from mr. miller until this morning and i did respond to them this afternoon and

dr. joshua starr is requesting background checks for all contractors.starr says the school system is reviewing its internal procedures to make sure any allegations like this are appropriately reported, investigated and communicated with the community. >>> today the man convicted of killing chandra levy is back in court. he was sentenced to 60 years in prison after his conviction in 2010. defense lawyers are questioning the testimony of a key prosecution witness. morales said he confessed while in prison. >> the supreme court will decide whether the piggy back tax on out of state income is legal. maryland gives credit if you pay taxes to another state but you are still required to pay your county taxes on that income. they could be on the hook for $150 million in back taxes owed to residents. >>> more than a week after elections we have a winner in the alaska senate race and the gop adding another senate seat with with republican dan sullivan defeating mark babic. it could end up being nine, which is happening next month. >>> thanks, angie. ferguson, mis

they requested dr. baden's testimony. and that is very interesting.he prosecutor's show. now this time, the grand jury said okay, mr. prosecutor, i have heard everything you had to say. i really want to hear more. and grand juries that are very active sometimes do that. so that is interesting, and perhaps they want to hear more information. but don, if they want to hear more information and they get more information on friday, if it is true that they have heard hundreds of hours of evidence, how is it possible that they could then get more evidence on friday and come back with -- that just doesn't make sense? >> but they're not sequestered? >> as far as i know. any prosecutor presenting a high profile case in front of the grand jury should be advising the jurors not to watch television that is covering this. i hope not, i hope not. but again, this is so bizarre. we've never seen anything like this. i don't care who sits across from you, don, and tells you that in police shootings this is how a grand jury is conducted, that is a lie. that is not true.

dr. bodden in that autopsy, here is what he told me a short time ago. >> is it your understanding the requestor dr. bodden came from someone in the grand jury room? >> it is my understanding that the grand jury had made a request that they wanted to hear, our results are from an independent autopsy. don't know what happened or when that happened in the process of things, but i also know that then also then crump had to push for dr. bodden to be able to come testify today finally allowed. >> today michael brown family attorneys said dr. bodden found one additional piece of evidence that a chest wound he thought was a re-entry wound is now determined to be an entry wound. can you confirm that. if so, what is the particular significance of that? >> well, he's probably -- in fact, he's talking about the wound to the right upper clavicle right here in this region. we had originally thought that the bullet continuation from the head wound above the right eye came out and re-entered. and now it is actually turns out to be a separate entry wound, which means -- we said at press conference, shot at le

there will be no separate discussion unless a member requests in which case it will be removed. i have 1 dr item under consent, no. 6 at 3224521st street, request for certificate of appropriateness, i have no speaker cards. >> thank you, commissioners, would any of you like to pull this off consent? seeing none, open up to the public. any member member of the public wish to pull this off consent? seeing none, bring it back to the commission. >> i move to adopt the consent klepb ker. >> commissioner hyland, yes. commissioner johnck, commissioner. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner wolfram, yes. and commission president hasz, yes. that passes unanimously 7-0 and places you under your regular calendar, item 7, the 5m project draft environmental impact report. please note that this public hearing is intended to assist the commission in its preparation of comments on the draft eir comments made by members of the public at this hearing will not be considered comments on the draft eir and may not be responded to in the final eir the planning commission will hold a public hearing to receive co

dr. lurie, let me ask you the same question. the 50 centers designated in the president's budget request is that in addition to the state designated centers or would those two state designated centers in texas full under the purview of the 50 centers that president obama's describing? >> as dr. frieden said, our process and plans have been to work through the states to identify facilities. ive the process works basically -- >> naake real simple. the two centers governor perry designated in the state of texas. do those fall under the parameters of what the president's budget request as it exists today? >> the funding will go to the states and the states in conjunction with the hospitals will determine which of the hospitals will serve as infectious disease containment centers or the ebola treatment centers system i guess that's as close as i will get to an answer. let me ask you a question. dr. lurie, do you report to ron clane? is that someone in the hierarchical reporting structure you have? is he a person to whom you report? >> i report to the secretary. i interface with mr. clane on a regular basis. >> in your testimony you say

dr. joshua starr is requesting background checks for all contractors. >> those of you in the city of alexandria could be head a tax increase. "washington post" saying it is look to go close a $16 million budget gap. they had a contentious meeting last night. a final vote not expect until sometime in may. a special veterans event is happening today. hiring our heroes job fair starts later this morning at joint base anacostia-bolling. there will be workshops before the hiring fair. >>> a dewey state student body slammed by a coach. the action the school took after seeing this video. >>> a woman watched on a home security app that someone broke into her condo. this morning, though, she's having the last laugh. >> yes. haha. >> what she knew that the thieves didn't that left her with a smile. >>> get ready for a cooldown. the changes coming today hour by hour in your weather and traffic on the 1s >>> bowie state university police investigating a former football coach caught on camera body slamming a student. former nfl player charles grant was fired from his volunteer position after tmz sports post

dr. amonth later, we got a request from the laytons for the architect to meet and these negotiations looked promising at first, but unfortunately they fell through, when we asked for some different kinds of modifications which were actually less than what we had originally asked for. and they thought that we were asking for more. where i think that for the very reasonable and minor modifications that would relieve a substantial about of shadow and boxing into your home and amounts to only 2400 square feet. that are being added to the pro-yekt and the sponsor is continued to add only two feet to the rear of the existing home but this is simply not true, here is the picture that you saw before, the overhead please? >> here is the back, the property and the laytons and cynthia and here is the two-foot extension. the roof of the bedroom to be sloped so that we can get more light into the skylights and that they bring back one portion of the back wall on our side, which is the north side, we request that it be returned for a fair and adequate notification for the public and to provide the asquai

dr. michael baden he performed autopsy at the family's request and testified in front of the grand jury. dr. bae den joins us. good evening, sir. >> good evening, greta. >> in looking at the decedent's body and the autopsy you conducted and the fact that you didn't look at the first one. were the wounds consistent with what this officer said in the grand jury or inconsistent with? >> well, the medical examiner who did the autopsy testified, i'm beginning to read over some of the testimonies now, and in his testimony he said that the gun was 6 to 9 inches away from the hand when he was shot in the hand. >> all right. that's inside the car. >> couldn't have been on the car. >> in the car. >> now they are both out of the car, the desee dent is blocking away and the police officer is in some pursuit. >> right. now all the other gunshot wounds are a distance away beyond three feet that we can't tell the difference between 2 and 3 feet and 30 feet from an autopsy. we can tell if somebody is coming towards you or away from you. that's where the credibility of the witnesses are. and as your guest

dr. baden at the request of the grand jury. >> that really is it. everything i read, he could be the final witness, the final piece of testimony in this grand jury before they decide whether or not they want to pursue charges against this police officer. it seems late. does it seem late or not necessarily? >> it not only seems late because again this grand jury was convened august 20th. if you are a prosecutor doing something that's so odd -- i don't care what anyone says. prosecutors, even in police shootings, do not put every stitch of evidence, including evidence that may not be admissible at trial, in front of a grand jury. the fact that they decided to use that tactic which is bizarre and unheard of tells me that it is even more odd that they wouldn't put in dr. baden's autopsy report. >> peter, do you agree? do you agree that it is odd, the timing of all this? >> i do. i think if the grand jury asked for it, they really were under an obligation to bring it and i think it was a wise move to do so. i think this grand jury is going to have a very

dr. lawrence e eggbert. he approved jana's request to die.e was final exit's medical director at the time of jana's death. 87 years old. he's friendly, charming, disarming. he doesn't own a cell phone or a car and he is passionate about this cause. >> a lot of people think of this as saints. >> according to final exit's own records these saints as he calls them helped hundreds of people to quote hasten death. by his own account when he was director eggbert approved 300 final exit applicants. >> they would say i'll get your name and your telephone number and somebody will call you back in a few days and that person would then call you back and ask you why. >> could you approve somebody without having met them? >> yes. i could. and say this is the reason to proceed. >> if that all sounds unnerving, then also consider this, according to police reports, jana told final exit she had lesions on the liver, possible breast cancer, head injuries, removal of the gallbladder, overexposure to radiation and ingestion of rat poison. did she have liver lesi