dr requestor? you have a two-minute rebuttal if you choose. >> where to start. i guess -- one issue is with a 42-inch opening rally. anyone can step over that. there is going to be an additional flight added on to the structure. it is going to st. -- go straight up to our property line. anyone can cross that. regarding the rear deck, this is designated as the rear yard. it is 12 feet the. section 136 clearly says -- including naina deck. we did have agreements, but they were never able to be enforced. we never reached a final agreement. even though -- i thought it was going to all worked out. it all fell apart when we could not find a way to enforce our agreement. that is all i can say. >> project sponsor, you have a two-minute rebuttal, if you choose. >> there is not much to say. we did have the disagreement. it was already written by the neighbor, and provided to us. we agreed to everything on it. however, it changed because of the height of the wall. we have done everything we could to accommodate the neighbors. we have been over backwards, just to meet their

the project sponsor and the dr requestor formulated a mitigation plan that the planning commission helped torpedo. the people of san francisco are not well served by alice in wonderland logic that blocks the compromises necessary for our neighborhoods. thank you very much. >> any additional public comment? speakers in favor of the dr? >> good afternoon. i have been a homeowner in the marina for 18 years. i live right around the corner from this proposed development. i've concerns about the street facing deck. this is a precedent-setting situation and i am concerned about the impact to the block face, noise, and also the impact to the residence in the adjacent buildings. i do not understand them and the requirement to have this open railing. we do not see that on top floors. we do not see open a railing. we see solid railing. these open railing decks, it is an intrusion to the block face. you will be able to see the contents of the deck from the street. that is very disruptive to the block face. if this is approved, these types of situations are all over the marina. it is very disruptive t

dr request your, you have five minutes. -- requestor, you have five minutes. >> ok. thank you for giving us the opportunity to speak on behalf of the owners of our building and the renters as well. i live at 1468 francisco street. it is a four units right next to 49 defense discuss street. -- 1490 francisco street. i have lived in the marina for 24 years. some more pictures. what you can seek is these are pretty much all of the bedroom windows. this is my bedroom window. it is a glass. it could easily be broken into. i am very concerned about security issues. these other windows have line of sight directly to the? deck. all of our bedrooms and kitchen windows have access to that deck as well. the open bedroom windows are the only open -- source of light and air from those units. you can see my security concern with anybody ought not -- on that deck. it also affects five other unitst. he deck is going there. they will be affected the same way. they have direct line of sight, privacy issues. this is also a very narrow at neuss tunnel. it is very narrow and everything t

dr request your, you have five minutes. -- requestor, you have five minutes. >> ok. thank you for giving us the opportunity to speak on behalf of the owners of our building and the renters as well. i live at 1468 francisco street. it is a four units right next to 49 defense discuss street. -- 1490 francisco street. i have lived in the marina for 24 years. some more pictures