dr. burgess ranking member schakowsky out and members of the subcommittee. thank you for the invitation to come speak about the work of the united states consumer product safety commission and our proposed budget for fiscal year 2016. i am pleased to be joined by my friends and colleagues from the commission, commissioner adler, commissioner buerkle and commissioner mohorovic. our vital health and safety mission touches us all in some way every day. from the parents of the baby a gently moves his or her child throughout the day from crib to baby bouncer to stroller and back again to the crib or the self-employed millennial who want a warm spring day relies on. ruthann to stay cool and an extension cord to power a computer, to the baby boomer who purchase adult benadryl to help care for an aging parent, a product in our jurisdiction are inseparable from our lives. we believe we provide an excellent return on investment for the american people. we run a lean operation and to cover thousands of different kinds of consumer products with a budget in the millions,

dr. burgess. in short, i think we are in a much better decision than we were before. one of the points i reminds folks of i'm the only nonlawyer on this commission. so i think in terms of metrics, from my formal education being the only mba, i think in terms of things being risk return on investment. in applying that to public service, i think about safety return on investment and i'm committed to the fact that the investment and evolution of our import targeting activities and sophistication of those strategies is the greatest safety return on investment that we can apply in terms of our resources and budget. it completely bypasses the difficulties that you mentioned mr. kmar man, with regard to recall effectiveness, et cetera and will ensure that we don't have to learn from bad experience. of course before us we have the potential to scale up into a nationalized program a very significant program. do i believe that we have a proof of concept and do we have reason to move forward based on the success of our pilot project? the answer for me is absolutely. but, again,

dr. burgess told us the energy efficiency standards would band incan december ent light bulbs, but that is false. you can go to the store today and see the light bulbs that meet the standards. they are the same as the old bulbs, except they last longer, use less electricity and save consumers money. we heard for the energy efficiency standards restrict choice. if you shop for light bulbs, you know that isn't true either. modern incandescent light bulbs and l.e.d. of every shape, size and color are available. consumers never had more choice. the efficiency standards spurns innovation that expanded options for consumers. they claim they would cost consumers money. in fact, the opposite is true. when the standards are in full effect, the average american family will save about $100 every year. that is $13 billion in savings nationwide every year. but this rider threatens those savings and consumer groups have consistently opposed this rider. here's the reality. the 2007 efficiency standards for light bulbs were enacted with bipartisan support and continue to enjoy overwhelming industry suppor

dr. burgess. in short, i do think we are in a much better position today than we were before.one of the points i remind folks of is i'm the only nonlawyer on this commission. so i think in terms of metrics, from my formal education being the only mba, so i think in terms of things being risk -- on return on investment. in applying that to public service, i think about safety return on investment and i'm committed to the fact that the investment and evolution of our import targeting activities and sophistication of those strategies is the greatest safety return on investment that we can apply in terms of our resources and budget. it completely bypasses the difficulties that you mentioned, mr. chairman, with regard to recall effectiveness, et cetera, and will ensure that we don't have to learn from bad experience. of course, before us we have the potential to scale up into a nationalized program, a very significant program. do i believe that we have a proof of concept and do we have reason to move forward based on the success of our pilot project? the answer for me is absolutely

dr. oz show" airs tomorrow with the amazing hugh jackman. >> the breakout star from the "unbreakable kimmy schmidt." see why when titus burgess joins us.cute. >> how cute is he. you used to sleep like a champ. then boom... what happened? stress, fun, bad habits kids, now what? let's build a new, smarter bed using the dualair chambers to sense your movement, heartbeat, breathing. introducing the sleep number bed with sleepiqtm technology. it tracks your sleep and tells you how to adjust for a good, better and an awesome night. the difference? try adjusting up or down. you'll know cuz sleep iq™ tells you. only at a sleep number store where you'll find the best buy rated mattress with sleepiq technology. know better sleep with sleep number. women talking about activia. when i feel bloated and my stomach is rumbling in the morning, it takes me forever to get dressed. i just like wearing a lot of black. i don't have the time to be gassy and uncomfortable, when i'm trying to get out of the house. those are the days you wear sweatpants. i love activia. that is so good. i eat activia every day. enjoying activia twice a day for 4 weeks may help