dr. carr. perhaps you covered this earlier. as the accreditation of the examiner's office ever been a concern bell or in jeopardy? >> it has been continuous, to my understanding, for over 20 years. it is only reason seat -- recently, during the last accreditation, that we had the issue regarding the facility and were told that if we did not seek a suitable replacement, we would lose accreditation. supervisor mirkarimi: how does a warning like that come to be? does that, in a visit by the state or national authorities? is it a three month warning? of one year morning? describe what it looks like. >> the actual inspection is a plan to inspection by the national association of medical examiner inspector. it is a rather extensive process. the physical plant is only one part of it. at the end of the inspection they write a written report, which is provided to the jurisdiction, a summary of their findings. the main deficiency that was found for our office in the last inspection was the physical plant. at that time we were still able