dr. deborah kerr included in the ethics minutes of february 27, 2017 under agenda item number eight. to make it very easy on everybody, those are the minutes that you approve tonight. dr. kerr included hundred 50 word summary talked with some very very important issues related to the whistleblower program. as a recipient of a very large settlement summer in the range of $750,000 from the city of san francisco, for multiple violations of the program, he is certainly well-positioned to speak to the issue. when dr. kerr states, quote the burden of proof is stacked against whistleblowers" is exactly right. in considering his argument i would like you also to consider the following. "-you may consider the ability of each party to produce evidence. if a party produced weaker evidence when it could've produced stronger evidence he may consider-you may distrust the weaker evidence.". i think the attorneys in the room will recommend that from being a civil jury instructions. there were given to jury saying that if you have one party to could've given you better evidence they didn't what eviden

dr. deborah kerr included in the ethics minutes of february 27, 2017 under agenda item number eight. to make it very easy on everybody, those are the minutes that you approve tonight. dr. kerr included hundred 50 word summary talked with some very very important issues related to the whistleblower program. as a recipient of a very large settlement summer in the range of $750,000 from the city of san francisco, for multiple violations of the program, he is certainly well-positioned to speak to the issue. when dr. kerr states, quote the burden of proof is stacked against whistleblowers" is exactly right. in considering his argument i would like you also to consider the following. "-you may consider the ability of each party to produce evidence. if a party produced weaker evidence when it could've produced stronger evidence he may consider-you may distrust the weaker evidence.". i think the attorneys in the room will recommend that from being a civil jury instructions. there were given to jury saying that if you have one party to could've given you better evidence they didn't what eviden

dr. deborah kerr included in the ethics minutes of february 27, 2017 under agenda item number eight. to make it very easy on everybody, those are the minutes that you approve tonight. dr. kerr included hundred 50 word summary talked with some very very important issues related to the whistleblower program. as a recipient of a very large settlement summer in the range of $750,000 from the city of san francisco, for multiple violations of the program, he is certainly well-positioned to speak to the issue. when dr. kerr states, quote the burden of proof is stacked against whistleblowers" is exactly right. in considering his argument i would like you also to consider the following. "-you may consider the ability of each party to produce evidence. if a party produced weaker evidence when it could've produced stronger evidence he may consider-you may distrust the weaker evidence.". i think the attorneys in the room will recommend that from being a civil jury instructions. there were given to jury saying that if you have one party to could've given you better evidence they didn't what eviden

dr. deborah kerr content of which is neither generated by the subject to approval or verification of accuracy by the ethics commission. that 150 word summary dr. kurt is the only person i know that is taking advantage of the thing that i thought 543 years to get and that is the law in san francisco is that if you make a statement a public hearing, and that you provide a summary of 150 words or less, that statement shall be placed in the minutes in the body of the minutes at the point where the discussion was held. dr. kerr is the one person who is taking advantage of this and i think anybody leads the minutes of meetings, whether it be this ethics commission or any of the body of the city, will find out that you are first amendment rights are violated on a regular and ongoing basis. they are censored abridged and any other permutation you can think of. if you look at these minutes basically what they say is there's a little brief statement like, mr. ray hartz got up and said something about something. that's the summary of your 3 min. comments. so if you want what you have to say to make it i