dr. el shiek, his mother-in-law and maybe a handful of students in 2c. not the rest of section 2, nothing in section 6. he doesn't have anybody seeking refugee admission. section 6 shouldn't even be on the table. look, i'll wrap up in the same way. yes we did say to the fourth circuit last week that the precedent set by this court in the president's immigration authority will long transcend this debate, this order and constitutional moment. counsel is right that this country is a beacon. what makes it a beacon is the rule of law. under the settle e ed legal rul for statutory interpretation, what the president did here falls squarely in his constitutional and strattory authority. i know they disagree with this president but none of that converts this into a constitutional crisis and we respectfully submit that this court shouldn't treat it like one. it ought to leave this debate where it belongs, in the political arena. the united states respectfully submits that this injunction should be vacated or, at a minimum, substantially narrowed. >> thank you, sol