dr. fleming? dr. fleming votes no. mr. kaufman question mark mr. kaufman votes no. ms. gabbard? ms.abbard votes aye. ms. hart's worth? no. mr. o'rourke? mr. o'rourke votes aye. ht? hec mr. scott? mr. scott votes no. mr. gallego. aye.allego votes mr. nugent? mr. nugent votes no. ms. graham? ms. graham votes no. mr. cook? mr. cook votes no. mr. ashford? mr. ashford votes no. mr. bronstein? mr. iu lark? mr. i go our votes -- mr. aguilar? mr. aguilar votes no. mr. graves? mr. graves votes no. mr. think he? mr.'s he votes no. phonicnic -- ms. stiff -- mr. macarthur? mr. mcarthur? russell? mr. russell votes no. mr. rogers. mr. rogers votes no. mr. shuster? mr. hunter? mr. hunter votes no. mr. macarthur? >> the clerk will report the tally. >> mr. chairman, 20 aye votes, 41 no votes. the amendmentry: is not adopted. >> mr. chairman i moved to adopt the subcommittee report on land forces. chair thornberry: those in favor will say aye. those opposed say no. a quorum being present, the ayes have it and the motion is adopted. the committee will now receive postponet on -- will until the end of

dr. fleming. >> i thank the gentleman for yielding. again, the word respect is a weasel word here. it has no meaning. simply put if you don't have the requirement to comply with those priorities then the general obligation bond holders have no priority whatsoever. they could slide to the bottom and pensioners slide to the top. something all of us have a concern here that there would in fact be no meaning to a general obligation bond holders which is full faith and credit. so for that reason this bill this law should require that those priorities be fully put in place and complied with rather than at the last minute through some shell game be moved about. just like we saw in the general motors situation where priorities were turned upside down against law. i yield back. >> mr. chairman i yield back. >> is there further discussion? >> look, i'm going to weigh in with one word. because, to be honest, i don't know what to do on this one. originally i said this was can you believe. i'm now being told we may have problems if it goes forward on the floor. so -- i don't know what i'm willi

dr. fleming. >> i thank the gentleman for yielding.against the word respect, the lethal word, has a meaning. simply put, if you don't have the required to comply with those priorities, the general obligation bond holders have no primary whatsoever. they could slide to the bottom, pinchers like to the topic something all of us have a concern here that you would, in fact, the new meaning to a general obligation on holder, which is full faith and credit. so for that reason this bill, this law should require that those priorities be fully put in place and complied with, rather than at the last minute through some shell game be moved about. and again just like we saw in the general motors situation where priorities were turned upside down against law. i yield back. >> mr. chairman, i yield back. >> is there further discussion? >> look, i'm going to weigh in with one word. because to be honest with you, i don't know what to do on this one. originally i said this was comfortable. i am hoping go buy some of the council that we may have problem

dr. fleming. >> i thank the gentleman for yielding. again, the word respect is a weasel word here. it has no meaning. simply put, if you don't have a requirement to comply with those priorities then the general obligation bondholders have no priority whatsoever. they could slide to the bottom and pensioners slitd to the top. something all of us have a concern here that there would, in fact, be no meaning to a general obligation bondholder which is full faith and credit. so for that reason, this bill, this law, should require that those priorities be fully put in place and complied with rather than at the last minute through some shell game be moved about and again just like we saw in the general motors situation where priorities were turned upside down against law. i yield back. >> mr. chairman, i yield back. >> is there further discussion? look. i'm going to -- i'm going to weigh in with one word because to be honest with you i don't know what to do on this one. i was saying it was comfortable. we may have problems with this if it goes forward on the floor. so i'm willing to -- i

dr. fleming is recognized for five minutes. >> first of all, it is my understanding that in case of danger to the life of mother or the result of rape or incest women are already able to access abortion on military facilities, military hospitals. so we're really talking about elective abortions. of course a miscarriage is not an elective abortion. miscarriage is something that happens in nature. know that most miscarriages result having to do with nonelective options. so when it comes to cost, we know that many health care providers on military basis, active duty military health care providers will opt not to participate, which means that you will have to hire civilians. they will have to be an investment of equipment, additional equipment. so there will be cost to taxpayers. is will in effect create a government-run planned parenthood on all the military bases. so for this and many other reasons it makes no sense to go down this road. again, there are abortion facilities in every state. we have great transportation. if a young woman wants to go off base to a private facility the option is