dr. george james. dr. james is a psychologist with the council for relationships. he specializes in couples therapy and family therapy. thanks for being with us, dr. james. george james: thank you, rosemary. rosemary: okay, so it's not arguing, it's not cheating. researchers say the number one reason is actually a lack of commitment. and in fact, researchers have found about half of all divorces come from relatively low-conflict relationships. explain this for us. george: so i mean, commitment is a huge part, right? so, we enter into a marriage, and some people have the thought of like, "this is going to be forever, like till the day i die, i'm going to be with this person." rosemary: till death do us part. george: right, and they actually believe that, and that's part of their commitment. they see it as a long-term thing. while other people, they see it as, okay, until a situation happens, or until there's an incident, or until the kids go away to school. and when we talk about commitment, really it's one of the different aspects of commitment. for some people, the

third,, james baker the george schultz who recognize this, who understand this, and he has got to start listening to these people. we could actually move rapidly to reducing emissions. amy: drmes hansen, one of the top climate scientists in this country but a couple years ago you were arrested, maybe because you are one of the top climate scientists, arrested protesting the keystone xl pipeline. when president trump came into office one of his first acts was to sign on to the dakota pipeline and the key line -- keystone xl. and you talk about the connection of pipelines like these to what we are seeing right now in texasas? drdr. hansen: yeah, exploiting e tar sands makes no sense at all because they are very carbon intensive. it takes a lot of energy to get that stuff out of the ground, to refine it, to make it usable, so it does not make any sense for us to develop those because what the science shows is we are going to actually have to extract some of the exes carbon out of the atmosphere. so to go to all l of this expene to find a new way to get more of it to put in the atmosphere just not make sense economically or scientifically or in any way. that is basically the co