dr. granger, but his work. consider the combined effect of the killer's plan: you lob an accusation of fraud and then stage it to look like granger killed himself in shame. so you think this is corporate espionage? loathe as i am to admit it, granger's benefactor hank prince may be right when he sees himself as the victim in all this. prince: i can't believe it. barry was adam peer. just not the one who called your invention into question. we've notified the journal his study appeared in the e-mail accusing fraud was, in fact, fraud itself. might not be the same as having dr. granger back to clear his name, but it should reassure your investors and expedite the vetting of the good doctor's work. you have no idea how much time you've just saved me. but... what now? obviously, "adam peer" didn't kill barry, so who did? we believe it was someone who had motive to attack you and your work. is it safe to assume the hound has competition? well, of course. any particular rivals spring to mind? i'll write you a list. be