it focuses on the title character, dr. jason bull, and how he uses psychology to help clients sway juries. this season, dives more into the character's personal life. >> save you breath, because we are interested -- >> you haven't heard the offer. >> i don't need to hear the offer. >> take a million dollars and multiply it by 500, no, let me put it another way, take a billion dollars and divide it in half. >> is this for real? >> doesn't get any realer. call your client. tell her the good news. >> actually, i'm on my way to see her now. >> i like her attitude. a little while ago, i had a chance to chat with actor michael weatherly, who plays dr. jason bull. >> you can explore that side of you that something that is -- you never thought was inside of you, i guess. >> yeah, no, i mean, that is the key, and you know, each human being has all of humanity in them. exploring what is the human behavior, why do people act against their own self-interests sometimes? you know, self-destructive move. >> you can see the premier tonight here

he plays dr. jason bull.gy and technology to pick the perfect jury for the desired outcome of each trial. in the preview of the season two premiere he tries to convince a colleague they're going to take a case. >> gave you a check for a quarter of a million dollars. >> the clayton family estate. they're pressuring the d.a. to try the young widow clayton for the murder of her husband. >> based on? >> based on the fact she shot him, a fact she does not dispute. yy mou he i tnhene t late mr. clayton was attempting to slice and dice his dearly beloved prior to her using him for target practice. i believe they call itself defense. >> maybe. or maybe she shot first and he stabbed her in self-defense. it is a quarter retainer and another quarter million if we go to trial and find her guilty. >> i had no idea could dr. jason bull be bought. >> we are pleased to have michael back to the table. he has cocky and has swagger. is it difficult for you to play? >> i don't know where that comes from. >> is that hard? >> that

jason. [ sighs ] [ footsteps approach ] mr. corinthos. dr. finn. mm. i just, uh, heard about jason. just came from, uh, seeing him. no change. it's been a-a rough few days. yeah. that's going around. well, listen, i know jason's gonna receive the best treatment possible, but if there's anything i can do, just ask.

they say it is because they have too much debt area still with us is jason furman. dr. explain to us the effect of this huge overhang. jason: it depends on the question. allou take a person and say things being equal, would you rather have more debt or less that? answer is less that. if you have more debt, you are like to have a harder time buying things. the reason you get student debt is because you pay for college. college raises your earnings a lot. the typical person with two that also has more education and has higher earnings area of those higher earnings or than make up for the cost of interest. you have $500,000 in extra earnings when you go to college. you incur 25,000 in debt. that's a really good deal the what you in a better position. analysis, we found that if you want to college and had student debt, you were more likely to own a home then if you did not the college and did not have student debt. david: you are very careful to say net present al you. a lot of that is going to be owned -- earned in the out years. thate not getting a lot of $500,000 up fron

been swelling since a judge cleared former officer jason stokley of killing the lamar smith in twenty eleven. or order or order or order. or we were. all dr ben margulies politics and international relations expert at warrick university in the u.k. joins us live now on the program good to have your company. do you think that violent protests were where for seeable as he nears the right word after such a decision. i'd say that they were if it's a historical pattern you often you have a cycle of peaceful protests in the united states which are followed by small splinter groups in gauged in violence so it's not. it's not an unusual pattern no though there's a difference between you know the small groups that break off from protests as we've seen in recent years and the larger. the larger scale more generalized rioting that used to accompany the. race related riots during the twentieth century for example in los angeles in one thousand nine hundred two but is it it's small splinter groups that we've seen and it's three sustained nights of violence that the police are not able to contain. yes but what i understand from the media reports there