as dr. jones said, having one or two of these signs doesn't necessarily mean you have an eating disorder. but it is food for thought. for "teen kids news," i'm katie. >> we'll visit a music program where the teachers are truly in >> studies show that learning to play an instrument develops our brains in a way that helps us better learn other subjects, yet many schools don't offer music lessons due to budget cuts, and a lot of families just can't afford private lessons. that's why this next story is music to our ears. >> so, to play "hot cross buns" we use the notes "b," "a" and "g," right? so, this one's "b"... >> this might look like any after-school music program, but look a little closer. [ saxophone plays ] that's right. this teacher is a teen. he's part of a program called a-chord with kids. young volunteers teach kids who might not be able to afford music lessons. [ keyboard plays ] the program was orchestrated by two friends, chase and austin. >> music's had a big impact on us, and we reall

dr. lucy jones, thanks so much as always. >>> turning to politics now. tomorrow marks exactly three months until the republican national convention, but who the party officially decides will be its nominee is still very much a mystery. when it comes down to it, both the gop and the democrats are dealing with the same issue. according to our new nbc news/wall street journal poll, their respective frontrunners are seen in the least favorable light of any candidate left in the race. so voters are being forced to make some tough choices. we have two reports tonight. we begin with jacob rascon. >> reporter: kate, good evening. we're now only two days away from the new york primary which donald trump hopes will be a turning point in the race, giving him the momentum he needs to avoid an open convention. meanwhile, a new polling shows that despite the unfavorability numbers, 62% of republican voters say if no gop candidate reaches the majority of delegates before the convention, the candidate with the most votes, which is right now donald trump, should be the p

rayburn, if the justice department uncovered evidence dr. jones violated the federal laws on fetal tissue donation, the statute, section 289 g-2 would have permitted the department of justice to prosecute. is that correct? >> yes. >> and the majority is saying the term valuable consideration is not fully defined and as a result the dodge is not capable of enforcing the law. in your opinion, does the department of justice lack the clarity they need the endorse the law? >> no. >> and there they had actually evidence of the violations the dodge would enforce the law would it not >> i have complete confidence the men and women of the department of justice know what they are doing and take it seriously, yes. >> so is it fair to say there is not a problem with the statute in the case of miles jones but a an of facts to support sh prosecution? >> that would be my inference. >> do you think we are in a similar situation today? >> yes. >> do you think the lack of prosecutions over the years signal there are not widespread violations of the law as we have h

dr. lucy jones, formerly of the u.s. geological survey. is it just a coincidence? >> it really is just a coincidence. we want a pattern because it would be less scary. randomness scas us so we look for the pattern but, in fa or twice a month. so it's not a big deal. we have looked for patterns and we never see an increase in rate of earthquakes more than 100 miles away. >> a big deal that so many people are dead and injured in these. any time we have major earthquakes, it puts americans on edge. people who live near the san andreas fault, they're going to want to know is there any way to predict the next big one? >> i get back to saying the time is random. these earthquakes didn't make a san andreas earthquake more likely. it also didn't make it less likely. the one thing that is not random in earthquakes is where they happen. we know where they are. we know where the shaking's going to be. eventually. and as we compare the level of damage we see in japan and ecuador, it reminds us how important building codes are and enforcement of the building codes because build

dr. miles jones. and found that after a thorough review of the issues, no violations of federal statutes were found. so mr. raben, if the justice department had uncovered evidence that dr. jones had violated the federal laws on fetal tissue donation, the statute in particular section 289 g-2, would have permitted the department of justice to prosecute, is that correct? >> yes. >> the majority appears to be saying that the term valuable consideration isn't fully defined and as a result the doj is incapable of enforcing the law. in your opinion does the department of justice lack the clarity that they need to enforce the law? >> no. >> and if the department had actual evidence of federal violations in those cases, the doj, would enforce the la, would it not. >> i have complete confidence they know what they are doing and take issues like this seriously, yes. >> is it fair to say then, that there really isn't a problem with the statute in the 2000 case regarding the miles jones investigation but rather a

dr. miles jones, the person in question, and found that after a thorough review, no violations of federal statutes were found. the death -- justice department had uncovered information that he had violated federal laws, the statute would have permitted the department of justice to prosecute. is that correct? >> yes. >> the majority appears to be saying the term valuable consideration is not defined as a result the doj is incapable of foreseeing -- enforcing the law. in your opinion is the department of justice lacking the clarity they need to enforce the law? >> no. >> if the department had actual evidence of federal violations in those cases, the doj would enforce the law. would it not? >> i have complete confidence the men and women of the department just as no they are doing. >> is it fair to say then there is not really a problem with the statute in the 2000 case regarding the miles jones investigation, but rather a lack of facts to support the prosecution. >> yes. do you think it is possible be lack of prosecutions that others referred to over the years under both republican and demo

dr. king, of rustin, of clarence jones and we don't have time for me to give you a little bio sketches of who these folks all were. the fbi's hypothesis that stan levison was a dangerous communist influence on dr. king was quickly disproved because in all of those hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours of electronic surveillance, there is no scintilla of evidence that stanley was in any way manipulative in his relationship to doc. stanley was as loyal and as helpful to martin luther king jr. as everyone in doc's life. i also in 1981, when the bureau was threatening me, had come upon the name of jim harrison. james a. harrison. still alive. who was the fbi's main human informant within sudden christian organization. dr. king's organization in atlanta. one cannot understand the history of what the fbi did to dr. king, did to the civil rights movement without knowing the full stories and the full documentary record of human informants like morris and jack childs, informants like jim harrison. since jim harrison is still alive, we don't have his file. and the most profound question to me

dr. king, of clarence jones.i apologize the dawn of time for me to give you little bio sketches of who these folks all were. the fbi's hypothesis was a dangerous communist influence on that are king was quickly disproved because in all those those hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours of electronic surveillance, there is no scintilla of evidence that stanley was in any way manipulated and his relationship stanley was as loyal and that's helpful to mark with the king junior as anyone in doc/. i also admit teen 81 when the bureau was threatening me had come upon the name of jim harrison, jamesa harris who was the fbi's main human within the southern christian leadership conference could dr. king's organization in atlanta. one cannot understand the history of what the fbi did to dr. king, due to the civil rights movement without knowing the full stories and the full documentary record of human informants like worsted jack childs, late jim harry said. since jim harrison is still alive, we don't have this file.

very extensive wiretapping and of clarence jones and i apologize to don't have time to give you those sketches. of the hypothesis was a dangerous influence on dr. dr. king because of those hundreds and hundreds of hours of electronic surveillance there is no scintilla of evidence that stanley was in any way manipulative in this relationship. he was as loyal and helpful to martin luther king, jr. as anyone. i also it in 1981 when the bureau was threatening me, had come upon the name jim harrison who was the fbi made a human informant to dr. king's organization in atlanta. one cannot understand the history of what the fbi did to dr. king without knowing the full story and the full documentary record like child's and harris in since he was still alive we don't have his file. the most profound question for me as a historian focuses on the fbi position that predates jim baker is rule that they will never give up even decades later later, the records documenting the human informants have done to american political movements i have a name to search for a new wonderful story of withers'. to do phenomenal work documenting how people who were a major pa

jones makes sense of investing. i'm bushed! i've been on my feel alyea me too. excuse me...coming through! ride the gel wave of comfort with dr. scholls massaging gel insoles. they're proven to give you comfort. which helps you feel more energized ...all day long. i want what he has. why do people have eyebrows?i. why do people put milk on cereal? oh, are you reading why people put milk on cereal? why does your tummy go "grumbily, grumbily, grumbily"? why is it all (mimics a stomach grumble) no more questions for you! ooph, that milk in your cereal was messing with you, wasn't it? yeah, happens to more people than you think... try lactaid, it's real milk, without that annoying lactose. good, right? mmm, yeah. i got your back. lactaid. it's the milk that doesn't mess with you. >>> it looks like the inside of a snow globe, beautiful. unless of course you have to shovel it. that's the university of colorado campus in boulder where they got more than 18 inches of snow this weekend. more than twice the previous record for that date. and if you think that's bad the foothills got more than 40 inches. >> it's april. >> april. >>> roa

robert profusek on, the head of mergers and acquisitions for jones day outs -- he got shellacked last week with , and it speakss to what drman is talking about, which is every company is dealing with lower growth, lower revenue growth prospects. there is the merge -- there is the urge to merge. if the credit markets go and change dramatically -- you have low growth, cheap money. what are you going to do? apply, synergize. there has been a difference from the first quarter, though. robert: it was down a little bit, and i think that was because the credit markets were in bad shape in january and february, and the equity markets were volatile. tom: through three administrations, clinton, bush the younger, and president obama -- and their antitrust and anti-bob profusek tone. are we going back to an anger of the 1930's or even the early 1940's? robert: well, the pfizer ruling, the new regulations, people are arguing that is targeted right at pfizer, and of course the president went on the air to talk about it. word, didsed the p he? that was a pretty extraordinary transaction. you have both parties complaining about inversion

dr. fleming's amend on 181 on the climate change. the clerk will call the rorn. >> mr. thorn bury. aye. >> mr. smith? mr. smith voice no. mr. joens? mr. jones votes aye. ms. sanchez. ms. sanchez votes no. mr. toeshs. mr. forbes votes aye. mr. brady votes no. mr. miller votes aye. mrs. davis. ms. davis votes no. mr. wilson. mr. wilson votes aye. mr. longman votes no. mr. lo biando votes no. mr. larsen? mr. larsen? mr. bishop? mr. bishop votes aye. mr. cooper. mr. cooper votes no. mr. turner? mr. turner votes aye. ms. berdaio? she votes no. mr. klein? mr. klein votes aye. mr. courtney? mr. courtney? mr. rodgers? mr. rodgers? ms. tsonag votes no. mr. garamendi? mr. garamendi votes no. mr. schuster? mr. schuster? mr. johnson? mr. johnson votes no. mr. conoway? mr. conoway votes aye. ms. speer? ms. speer votes no. mr. lamborn? mr. lamborn votes aye. mr. castro? mr. castro votes no. mr. whitman? mr. whitman votes aye. ms. duckworth? ms. duckworth votes no. mr. hunter? mr. hunter votes aye. mr. peters? mr. peters votes no. dr. fleming? dr. fleming votes aye. mr. vissi? mr. vissi votes no. mr. kauffman votes aye. ms. gabbard? ms. gabbard votes no.