dr. krugman's appeal to children who do not get adequate food in a country that has a women, children, andnts program, it has food stamps, prenatal care, a program specifically designed for children. despite spending billions of dollars, you may be commenting on the ineffectiveness of government to reach every child, but not because we're spending a lot of money to ensure every child has good nutrition. one thing there that i thought was amazing that i don't think larry understood he said. and he said the difference in television price and health care is changed by a factor of 100 -- meaning televisions today are 100 times less expensive relative to health care than they were say in 1960 -- or 1950. he doesn't stop and say, gee, why is it that we're able in the private sector to produce, for example, hand held computers called cell phones at declining costs with rising capability and we can't in government control their end get the same kind of breakthrough. so i'm arguing -- we're on the edge if there's the courage to do it of a breakout of how we think of all of government. i'll give you

dr. krugman's appeal to children that don't get adequate footh food.n a country that has a women's nfant program, it has food stamps, a food program to help children eat. despite spending billions of dollars, you may be commenting on the effectiveness of government to reach children, but it is not because the money is not there. larry summers said one thing that i think is amazing that i don't think larry understood what he said. he says, the difference in television vs. price care has changed by a factor of 100. meaning televisions today are 100 times less expensive relative to health care than they were say in 1950 or 1960. he doesn't stop and say, gee, why is it that we're able in the private sector to produce, for example, handheld computers called cell phones at declining cost with rising capability and we can't, in government-controlled areas, get the same kind of break through? i would argue, we are on the edge, if we have the courage to do it, on a breakout of how we think of government. i will give you a specific example. i'm a conservative, s

examples.take two krugman's ll, dr.ppeal to children who do not get adequate food in a country has a women, children, and infants program, it has food stamps, prenatal care, a program pecifically designed for children. despite spending billions of dollars, you may be commenting ineffectiveness of government to reach every child, but not because we're spending a of money to ensure every nutrition.ood one thing there that i thought i don't think t larry understood he said. and he said the difference in health carerice and is changed by a factor of 100 -- meaning televisions today are 100 times less expensive relative to health care than 1960 -- or y in 1950. he doesn't stop and say, gee, able in theat we're private sector to produce, for xample, hand held computers called cell phones at declining costs with rising capability and can't in government control their end get the same kind of breakthrough. i'm arguing -- we're on the edge if there's the courage to we t of a breakout of how think of all of government. i'll give