dr. lambert that the test plan his board approved was for a drug identical to vioxx. could you aof propprove a pl that's already been known to be pulled off the market and have been been linked to deaths, strokes and heart attacks? >> i don't know. i really do not know how that could have occurred. we're very thorough in our reviews of protocols. >> but if excess really did thoroughly review the safety of our plan, like review boards are supposed to, an easy internet search would have shown our drug wasn't safe because we used the same abbreviation, mk-0966, as merck did for vioxx. the reality doctor, is this, had you just used google you would have figured this out. review boards are also supposed to make sure the doctor running a study is qualified. remember, the doctor leading our study and his medical certificate were fabricated by the government accountability office for its own sting. did you check independently to see if in fact he had a medical license? >> we probably did get a copy of a medical license. >> well, it doesn't exist. >> essex office supervisor tr