dr. mark siegel, a member of the fox news medical a-team. tell you, i look at this and i think, how is it possible that all of these kids have this problem? we had not even heard of this problem 20 years ago. now one in ten kids has a ph.d. >> 6 million, more than of $4 billion industry. gerri: that is the important fact right there, 80's and industry. >> and by that iean everybody is busy diagnosing it. not necessarily only the appropriat people. pediatricians. gerri: the don't draw blood and find a phd. there is no test for it really. you're just watching behavior. at the end of the day is being over diagnosed? >> i think so, and i have some evidence. hyperactivity, impulsivity. it sounds like -- and why is it? gerri: 20% of high-school boys. >> there you go. and why are boys twice as likely? well, because there probably twice as likely to be inattentive and distracted. girls are taught earlier how to behave, maybe more advanced and actually. gerri: more advanced, i think you know that well. one of the things i think is feeling this is the

dr. mark siegel, a remember of the fox legal a team you.these would be problematic from the start, and apparently costly, too much what's going on? >> the 5.7 bill you showed is only to cover the 17 states doing their own exchanges. on top of that, there's about a $3 billion price tag for the state's 26 states the feds are setting up. by the time is this over, by 2014, we are looking at more than $10 billion that most of which hasn't been appropriated at all. so -- >> neil: why is that a big neil these insurance exchanges are more expensive to get going an thought. how does that filter town to us? >> well, first of all, they're going to come right from the taxpayer pocket. if congress afrees to this. congress may not agree. last year they at any time agree. they haven't appropriated any money for this. what is going to happen to these exchanges if congress doesn't approve? they may not actually happen at all. if they do happen you have to pay taxes and i said that obamacare is one big tax on top of the medicare tax, the payroll tax on medic

dr. mark siegel with the other side of the story. we have limited time.ink that company you represent should be able to patent the human gene. go. >> good morning, stuart. if i told you i invented a substance that could be used to determine whether your wife or daughters have an increased risk because of the jet nicks of breast or ovarian cancers, that's an important invention. fact is here, the invention here happens to be a newly created isolated genetic material to be used for those purpose. they allow purposes on those substances now for over 30 years. >> so it's not pa tenting a gene, but patenting genetic material; is that correct? not the full gene; is that right, gregory? >> you have it generally right. it is called an isolated human gene because it's defined as well as produced by human inventers. that's what patent code is designed to protect. >> it's not a product of nature. you are talking about manmade; correct, gregory? >> that is correct. >> okay. doctor, what do you have against a manmade molecule, genetic material which could be a benefit

dr. mark siegel spoke to her. he is live at the hospital in boston. dr.e was standing at the finish line watching the runners come in, and it blew her off her feet. her friend leo came running to the rescue, picked her up in his arms and carried her off to safety. >> laid me down, took off his shirt, tied to stop the bleeding. kind of conducted someone to come over and help pick me up and put me in the car. drove down one-way streets and got me to mass general hospital within ten minutes and i was here and the staff was taking care of me right away. so i don't remember -- i remember it all. >> did you feel anything? >> i think i was in such a state of shock i didn't. i was more concentrated on -- i didn't think i was going to make it. it was a good amount of bleeding. >> megyn, she is expected to make a full recovery, but for some of the century involvers it's a long road ahead with both psychological, emotional, and physical. they but kaitlin is determined not to be defeated. megyn? >> god bless her. thank you. after the break, new evidence that some of

dr. mark siegel knows quite a bit about this issue. in fact he wrote a book on it.fessor of medicine at nyu and a member of our fox news medical a-team. dr. siegel, how are you? >> i'm great. tom skinner, senior spokesperson from the cdc this morning. first thing he said, i couldn't agree more, the best treatment for fear is information. martha: right. >> that is how the cdc is looking at this. they're preparing seed banks against the possibility they might need a pandemic vaccine. this is very unlikely because this kind of a bird flu we're talking about doesn't typically cause pandemics. usually h1s, h2s. this is h7n9. what does that mean. h is the protein on the surface of the flu we use to identify it that helps the flu spread. this is a bird flu. before it can spread easily from human to time, it would have to change. even though it has been found in 14 humans and killed six in china it is not spreading from human-to-human. and that is very good thing. even if it were to do that, how easily, how many humans are affected? not like the movie contagion where overni

dr. mark cycle. marc siegel. and everybody is worried about, like sars, and shut the country down.is like a sars kind of event? we're coming for you for technical information, number one, is this transmitted from birds to humans directly? >> it can be. there was only going from bird to bird previously, but now it's starting to lodge in human nostrils, but it's not spreading from human to human. stuart: that's important. >> not only is that important. there are so many viruses that do this. it's not like sars, it's like influenza. flu starts in birds. a lot of times flu strains will go from birds to humans and what worries us, is when it gets to humans it's particularly deadly, but not spreading from human to human, fear is spreading. and that's the economic coin here. >> hold on, i've got to go at this. we're not trying to reassure anybody, but i want to assess the potential impact on the rest of the world. you're saying that so far, this bird flu does not go from human to human, i call that good news, right? and secondly, it doesn't go from birds to humans. it does go from birds t