dr. midari is that mr. dr. midari.they consider these things to be closely related, and in some places, they may actually believe that they are related to each other because they judge the fate of both in almost the same way . financially , there are differences between fixed assets and immovable assets due to the type of policy, land and company. the company must be focused on the future of profitability. the company has workers. the company has financial speed, profit and loss, etc. , and these are fixed. in fact , it does not have immovable assets, such as real estate, land, etc., workers. it is not a company at all, the nature of how its future vision can be copyrighted or not does not exist. therefore, it is different , of course, it is necessary to plan somewhere in the macro-policy , because after all, an asset is an asset. i think on this point, no one actually disagrees that productivity means in the general sense that we say that an asset should be used better. no one can deny it at all because it is one of t

dr. midari and his excellency your colleagues, well, there has been a lot of talk about this issue, and i have actually spoken in different circles. i will actually leave my own speech. now, if there is a discussion , i would like to make an introduction . i want to find out what is the difference between the production of immovable property and the privatization of companies and economic enterprises . they are overlapping. i understand from what mr. midari said that mr. midari mixes these things together a lot. they know, and in some places, they may actually believe that they have a similar relationship, because they judge the fate of both in almost the same way. in this sense, i believe that financial assets are actually one of fixed assets and other assets. there are differences in terms of the type of policy, the land and the company, the company must be focused on the profitable future, the company has workers , our company is fast. therefore, it is different, of course, which is necessary somewhere in policy making. be careful, because after all, property is property. i think on th

dr. midari's point should be discussed in detail, because one point is another statistic, that is, we have a number of companies, like mr. doctor , saying that they were either executed or faced with legal problems, and there was a fight. so we got these because of you you yourself were in the government, and we transferred these to several companies. i don't remember the order, but it means the model you mentioned, or execution , or the state fund, that is, we transferred all large companies to these, in fact, public institutions since the decade. 1380, almost from 1984 , it was transferred to the social security organization and fund, tepe, which was transferred to haft tepe, i think it was transferred in 1989 or 1990, and then it was the same story again . it was given to the social security organization of the country's steel fund, my doctor. leave these to the part of procurement that is doubtful, many of them have been handed over, but we are absolutely logical when we use them, there are no others, examples of defects such as our own company , 951 companies have been handed over. fr

midari, maybe the question would be more accurate if we ask it like this, now do you think about the current situation in our country, mr. drrbanzadeh also pointing out that basically we need productivity, and the way they are referring to it, for example , the 5,000 meters vanko that you gave as an example, now let's not just sell it, let's make a change in it , so that we can really reach the real meaning of productivity . you can see now with this method what is happening in reality? we say that there is a slow movement. why is it a slow movement ? why is it actually faster? the government, in fact , there are many disputes that occur between the government and legal issues. in the last one year, a friend approached me and said, "sir, we bought a unit from one of the banks. now the judiciary has come and sealed it . they say that this agency has been sold to someone else. i called the bank's legal department. sir, this is the problem," he said. sir, be sure, the party said, i don't want this kind of property. i gave my money back to the bank for 6 months and it should be given to me. it was my single sheet, but the previ