dr. pating's point was sufficiently taken. does the wording currently because you do speak about adjustments of allocation formulas for homelessness and what not, or do we have to add housing into it for the suggestion? >> it doesn't hurt to add housing. it's a long standing issue we were trying to get. as an example in the drug medi-cal they don't pay for room and board. >> so any approval on our part we could as an addition suggest that housing be added under the mental health? >> okay and the second one is the clarification under 47 and the services were to reduce recidivism. >> and that is for clarity and if we move approval and part of that. >> if you want to be generous we could say no to powered alcohol. >> i'm not sure. it's already on there. >> it's a little open ended but it's okay. i know director garcia will do the right thing. >> it says take positions where appropriate. >> the appropriate is a no. [laughter] >> okay. so we don't have to put that in? >> no, i'm fine with it. >> all right. >> just do the right thin

dr. pating and commissioner taylor-mcghee. >> i'm trying to get a narrative, so again, when i go home, i can sleep tonight around this. director garcia, you always have my support. so you don't need to put it in a resolution. i'm look at four factors, quality, cost k feasibility and integration and i'm hearing either way we're going win with this. feasibility you worked out a really elegant solution that saves staffing, effort, time, and i just really want to applaud you on that. >> thank you. >> to hear mr. wagner on costs and then hear you on integration one more time. >> yes. >> the last episode and i don't think i have missed any tv shows here, my recollection on cost we're worried about a $20 million a year amortization that we had to keep paying out kind of indefinitely and with the cerner product was going to be smaller and tradingoff cost and quality. what happened to the gap? have you closed it enough? i'm pleased that the mayor is weighing in and feels that you have done good work here, but i'm still in the last episode we didn't have enough to pay for the product. so [kwha-pd/

dr. pating and commissioner taylor-mcghee. >> i'm trying to get a narrative, so again, when i go home, i can sleep tonight around this. director garcia, you always have my support. so you don't need to put it in a resolution. i'm look at four factors, quality, cost k feasibility and integration and i'm hearing either way we're going win with this. feasibility you worked out a really elegant solution that saves staffing, effort, time, and i just really want to applaud you on that. >> thank you. >> to hear mr. wagner on costs and then hear you on integration one more time. >> yes. >> the last episode and i don't think i have missed any tv shows here, my recollection on cost we're worried about a $20 million a year amortization that we had to keep paying out kind of indefinitely and with the cerner product was going to be smaller and tradingoff cost and quality. what happened to the gap? have you closed it enough? i'm pleased that the mayor is weighing in and feels that you have done good work here, but i'm still in the last episode we didn't have enough to pay for the product. so [kwha-pd/

dr. pating's point was sufficiently taken. does the wording currently because you do speak about adjustments of allocation formulas for homelessness and what not, or do we have to add housing into it for the suggestion? >> it doesn't hurt to add housing. it's a long standing issue we were trying to get. as an example in the drug medi-cal they don't pay for room and board. >> so any approval on our part we could as an addition suggest that housing be added under the mental health? >> okay and the second one is the clarification under 47 and the services were to reduce recidivism. >> and that is for clarity and if we move approval and part of that. >> if you want to be generous we could say no to powered alcohol. >> i'm not sure. it's already on there. >> it's a little open ended but it's okay. i know director garcia will do the right thing. >> it says take positions where appropriate. >> the appropriate is a no. [laughter] >> okay. so we don't have to put that in? >> no, i'm fine with it. >> all right. >> just do the right thin

dr: mr.waarc edrds of in virgh ia tecenhas bein studygfl waint's ter. i >>eef, indisd, it e truthisca astem--hend t are'sy prettst ikrong ld elihoot that iis andth t at ie-will b- yes, ununfort pately,wieople ell hav f diedisrom thse disea.>> or repemter: fysa say' thell on resphed to tno goverr's ge emerquncy re eest assarly ath eeis wkend. t,scot m thewoove unuld lockfe l deras fundepto rflair sint' sywater ndstem are help s.sident le>> peliay: adrz na diantin fli dfo onr us tight.ad a,rians. thank wathere s rra te aoracttk ghtoni bt innourki a faso,mu nslimn atioesin writ afca.gu snmenedtormup an e scallhote eqfrntue bedsty werserne. mba nu oerf oppe hlebeave en edkill.ho esstage wern.take i anicslamro terour grp liaffi watedalith da qae hasai clspmed relionsibity. pe euroth is re iinkingefts rugeeli poercy aftth more man aonillire sfugeesedettlre the lastar ye. e thgerefud es flendwars a h nort, africaw but nevaarrils g inecreare w e nondfig inatth eu pero w'scoel hme lasitims. llhowiy iall hms tast.ha ep>> rr:ortepi deshete tfr ngeezid, col r the sougheas, d anrithe f sk onidrowthng, e gr mi kantscoeep .ming re mon tha0 1,00lepeopiv arre in ee grvece eayry dt , bunow ro eu wpe