dr. quijano to find mr.k likely to commit criminal acts of violence, and further argue that the jury should disregard the aspects of dr. quijano's opinion that conflicted with a finding of future dangerousness. when texas did its -- its review of -- of death row after it conceded error in saldano, it looked through all of the cases on death row to see what else was contaminated by dr. quijano's racist criminal violence opinion. and one of the other cases it looked at and ruled out was the anthony graves case, which demonstrates the options that were available to this prosecutor under these circumstances. in the anthony graves case, dr. quijano was called as a defense witness, just like he was here. in the anthony graves case, the defense elicited dr. quijano's race as criminal violence opinion on direct examination, just as here. but the difference is, in the graves case, the prosecutor did not reiterate it on direct examination, and -- and then in closing, argued that the jury should disregard dr. quijano's