dr. sanders.gery, the blood thinner incident, angela's disappearance, the men in the bar. does he have any hard evidence? nothing. but he's convinced that she hasn't told him everything. has he talked about this with anybody else? i don't think so. burton: good to see you, jimmy. don't mean to put you on the spot. jimmy: please, i've known your kid since he was ten, happy to help. here you go. appreciate your help, as always. logan tells me you're still investigating dr. sanders. yeah. there are pieces that don't add up, and too many of them connect to her. so, what are you thinking? this is a personal thing with her and the nurse? or something more? what i'm going on is a hunch. the blood thinners, they weren't a mistake. you think dr. sanders is part of a plot to kill the president? maybe. well, if you're right, then there has to be some sort of motive. have you checked her financial records? logan is working on it. does she have a political history? not that i'm aware of, but i'll keep looking.

dr. sander herself and a round of applause, the california endowment and others provided tremendous financial support so thank you very much for that. [applause] . we really do appreciate it and the cohost and mary lee and tom torque son and who you met this morning and our next panel is planning for student safety opportunity and success and planning for action around the bay. our moderator is jill tucker an education reporter at the san francisco kron cell. i told jill it's hard to find bios online for reporters. they can stay out of google. she's award winning reporter and covered california schools for 14 years and knows a lot about this subject and was honored by the california teacher association and received the highest award about the growing number of homeless students in the school system. she is a san francisco native and was in the peace corps and tout in west africa and please welcome jill tucker. [applause] >> thank you. she just dated me with that 9090 peace corps thing. okay. i want to say how great it is to be here. i have been looking at everyone's name tags and awed by the

sanders. , forank you, dr. elmendorf being here. i thought your presentation was interesting. you left out some important facts of contemporary america. i will tell you what i in can you tell me if you agree. think and you can tell me if you agree. one of the difficult things is to deal with priorities. and you spend money or cut money it impacts real human beings. in america today, we have the distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s, late 1920s. in terms of financial wealth, the top 1% owns 38% of the wealth of america and the bottom escape percent owns all of 60% owns allbottom of 2%. and 2012, 95% of topnew income went to the 1%. does that sound roughly right? it sounds roughly right. we have not done an analysis ourselves through 2012. you are certainly right that the distribution of income and wealth in this country is much more uneven now that it has been in decades. go forward in terms of our priority -- some want to cut medicare and medicaid and programs for low income people. there are more people living in poverty than any other time in american history. >>

dr. price and senator sanders. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to commend you and senator murray for continuing to provide opportunity for exchange of ideas and gaining information. dr. elmendorf, welcome back once again. i was struck by your three conclusions, one, debt larger than after world war ii, two, debt will continue to rise and we are on your words an unsustainable path, and, three, that current law, if followed, will result in a decrease of congress' ability, the people's representatives ability, to provide prioritization and spending on defense and nondefense areas to a smaller level than any time in the last 50 years in 2017 and beyond. real fundamental change in the work that congress does. now i'm hopeful that we can reach a large agreement. i think we can reach an agreement. i'm not sure how large it can be, i'm hopeful that it is large, but i think we need to walk before we can run, likely. so my question is a specific question about sequester. the discretionary side of spending will decrease january 15th down to 965, 967 o

dr. price and senator sanders. >> thank you mr. chairman. i want to commend you and senator murray for continuing to provide opportunities for exchange of ideas in gaining information. dr. elmendorf welcome back once again. i was struck layer three conclusions. debt larger than in any time in our history since world war ii and that will continue to rise and we are in your words on an unsustainable path and number three that current law if followed will result in a decrease of congress's ability and the people's representative abilities to provide participation in defense and non-defense areas to a smaller level than anytime in the last 50 years to 2017 and beyond so the fundamental change in the work that congress does. i'm hopeful that we can reach agreement and i think we can reach agreement. i'm hopeful it is large but i think we need to walk before we can run likely. my question is a specific question about sequester. the discretionary side of spending will decrease january 15 down to 967 or so and there are many that believe that is not

. >> senator bernie sanders of vermont, thank you so much for your time. joining me now is dr. kavita patel, managing director for clinical transportation and delivery at the engelford center for health care reform. she worked as a senior adviser to valerie jarrett in the obama administration. all right, last night, i came on this program and we ran a clip, a package that said, you're not helping. and we talked about the mary landrieu proposal, which looks in many ways similar to what the president outlined administratively today. the problem is, it looks like it is going to undo some of the risk pooling that you need to make these exchanges work in the first year. is this good policy, as someone who is an architect of this bill? >> yeah, thanks, chris. this is a really problematic policy for several reasons. and i actually just talked with one of the mayor insurers, who had canceled a good number of the policies that we're talking about. and they said, you know, the president is putting the responsibility on us. however, you know, you have to understand, even if we wanted to o