supreme soviet in such terrible elections and so on, but he won, he was a leader. turned his back to drach. they sat with their backs, not facing each other arguing, but with their backs, because kravchuk fiercely argued that we do not need any movement, what are you here with the bander nationalistic symbols, blue and yellow, we have everything, we have blue and yellow look at our flag over there yellow the heart of the hammer is gold, it is yellow, and look at the red and blue, there is already blue. that is, these colors are present and this essence is communist. of course , he understood everything perfectly, he perfectly understood what the history of ukraine was, but he continued to play what an ideological guest should have played communists in ukraine because ukraine had and has and these days prove that it has a defining value for muscovy as a part of the muscovite empire separated from the muscovite empire. the empire cannot exist without muscovite, so all efforts were abandoned. uh, when he came to power in kyiv, uh, gorbachev gave gorbachev, so to speak, a little bit of uh, wel

polytechnic on the morning of that september, when the founding congress of the movement was opened, then drachme and pavlychko said we thought you were sent to us, but you say when i saw that you were crying during the cossack march, he said all doubts already already broke up yes, i remember i remember this melody by sergius, because i really liked it, i thought why i had never heard it in my life, but it was interesting, and then i remember how it ended with what red ka leopolda, not yet ukraine did not die red viburnum then it was anthem then it was this this pathos it was this exaltation this was what in the end established this spirit of ukrainian spirit of ukrainian immortality . today, what are its sounds, what is its meaning, it inspires even now. that is, it is what actually constitutes the spirituality of ukrainian existence and ukrainian and not ukrainian indestructibility through spiritual symbols, through music , words of songs, and so on. later, of course, when we adopted the constitution, we wrote down what the national anthem is, what the national coat of arms is, and so on, an

, spirituality of ukrainian is highly valued and not further, it was very good indeed, i told ivan drach think, we are to blame for the fact that in 1991 they left there on the mountain in in kyiv, the power is in the hands of the old nomenclature, it is you, all the democratic organizations, we are to blame for these parties, we are to blame for the fact that in 1994 the elections were held and today, we have no opportunity to make mistakes , because today the question is whether to be us or not to be us, what has led to this war is just putin attacked, well, look for the guilty among us, well, you know, there are many things that are done wrong. many states have their own problems, but not all states have problems near the borders. putin, who believes that this state does not exist. he believes that ukraine does not exist. this is the main problem, but in this war how do you see the perspective and how do you see the perspective of this people, who is now, this government, who is now, this army, who is now to win and what will be the victory in this war, i am reinforcing here, it is in

a symbolic leader at that time and i remember very well how well 1 kravchuk er turned his back to drachsat with their backs not facing each other arguing but with their backs because kravchuk fiercely argued that we do not need any movement what are you doing here with the bander nationalist symbols blue and yellow we have everything we have blue and yellow look at our flag there is a yellow heart, a hammer, gold, this is yellow , and look at the red and blue. there is also blue. that is, these colors are present and this essence is communist. of course, he understood everything perfectly, he perfectly understood what the history of ukraine was, but he continued to play what was supposed to play the ideological guest of the communists in ukraine. because ukraine had and has and today proves that it has a defining value for muscovy, as it is not a separate part of our empire, without which the muscovite empire cannot exist, that is why all efforts were abandoned. why for so long shcherbytskyi was in power in kyiv, gorbachev gave gorbachev a little , so to speak where is he in the forest,

does not understand the struggle of the independent people against totalitarianism, the same ivan drache is the first leader of the ukrainian people's movement of the people's movement of ukraine, he also said that this was gorbachev's mouthpiece, the bayonets came here, they took the speech into his ears and the editor was in his homeland. where are you? new york times william saffer called this speech chicken kiev, that is, chicken kiev, so what prompted bush then to say these words, one can assume that one belongs to the generation that survived the world war. he understood perfectly. what could be the result of the revival of nazism in the center of europe next to a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons. so he tried to sit on two chairs to finish off the ussr and direct the breakaway ukraine towards a neutral status, realizing what would happen otherwise, he was well aware that sooner or later on the path of cave ukrainian nationalism. they are doomed to face the russians the most interesting thing is that on the eve of this famous speech, where you will warn about the dangers of ukrainia