the bar of entrapment is incredibly difficult in federal court and what you and i might consider an drebinbased on the effects of the reading of the case is different from what the federal courts view as entrapment and so far in these cases and drebin has not been determined. >> host: i want to show the viewers how 508 cases you looked at were prosecuted. 240 of those were charged with terrorism. 268 were charged with other crimes. can you explain this a little more? what does that say about our national security laws? >> the 500 cases we are identified we identified according to how the doj defines terrorism. they define terrorism cases according to two types. the first type is what you would imagine. someone trying to hijack an airplane, someone trying to use a weapon of mass destruction. that is type 1. type ii is when the fbi or the department of justice are able to charge someone with a crime that isn't related to terrorism such as money laundering or immigration violation. but that defendant in the fbi view has a link to international terrorism and so in some cases the department of