the same supreme court so that people are property dred scott affirm slavery in two thousand cannot the supreme court said property is people killed decisions i didn't see was was was was fun person come talk to them telling them how about cutting the many shingles and a coalition of individuals who are getting the issues coming together with a secular purpose. to land a constitutional amendment to make it clear cut it is. they do not have been here emailing them about hello that money is not political speech us. today and how he's coming top doctrines must be abolished we cannot overturn good republican night and still allow wealthy individuals to stand out enough money oh we were. up the. uk i. feel. monstrosity look around at the power monopolies have you noticed a life as our society shapes he gets treated like us use the excuse that someone's got to lose with some push for race to the wind as if it's not going to be all this you know built on the backs of our morris brothers we're told forgotten the face we're all taught by our mothers. the people of the us the pale coolest ful

the same supreme court so that people are property dred scott affirm slavery in two thousand the supreme court said property is people killed decisions i didn't see. was was was was thought for some time to talk to them telling them the wow. coming to the migration was a culmination of individuals organizations coming together with a secular purpose. to where they come from to fill in that much to make it clear cut because. they didn't know how to begin hearing a mailing about how our way. money is not political beat us. today and how he's coming top doctoring mushy about why we cannot overturn good republican night and still allow wealthy individuals to speak out and the money oh they were. oh. oh oh. oh. oh oh. oh oh. oh oh oh oh oh oh. these are the he was kind of. monstrosity around the power monopolies have you noticed a life as our society shapes he gets needed like let's use the excuse that someone's got to listen put for a show the wind as if it's not the old you know built on the backs of morris brothers we're told forgotten the stage we're all taught by our mothers. the people

the same supreme court so that people are property dred scott affirm slavery in two thousand and ten the supreme court said property is people just decisions i mean see was was was was fun person from god told me i'm telling. you i was. going to tell you the man i really should was and that coalition was individuals organisations coming together with a secular purpose to. to where they come from to fill in that much time they can clear cut away just because they didn't know how can i hear you emailed them about how. money is not political speech. and why palin to the end how he's coming to top post doctrines must be abolished he cannot overturn corporate functionality and still allow wealthy individuals to stand out enough the money how. about. half. past the past how have you all thought he's going to heal with my son if i thought that ha it was all about is the office the month club city look around at the power monopolies have you noticed people are like this double our society face me gets me just like you with the excuse that someone's gotta loose with some point for racing to w

the same supreme court so that people are property dred scott affirmed slavery in two thousand cannot the supreme court said property is people killed decisions i didn't see was i was right i was like fuck for some punk told them telling them how about. coming to the bed i'm a single mom and a coalition of individuals organisations coming together with a secular purpose. to where they come to kill and then to make it clear cut because. they do not have been hearing about oh that money is not political speak to us. today and how he's coming top post doctrines must be about why we cannot overturn good republican nodded and still allow wealthy individuals to stand out and the money. they were. up. up. up. up. up. up to all costs. he says that he would ha ha ha it's all mine. monstrosity around the power monopolies have you notice she's a like this double our society shake he gets me just like you with the excuse that someone's got to put for a show the with as it is not the old they don't build on the backs of the more it's been those we're told forgotten the thing we're all taught by ou

but he's broken his speech constitutional rights are for people over eight hundred fifty six and dred scott the same supreme court so that people are property rights got a firm slavery in two thousand and ten the supreme court said property is people killed decisions i didn't see was was was was thought for some from god told them telling. you how how. could god that was racial god that coalition was individuals organisations coming together with a secular purpose demanding to know where they come from to kill and then i tell a clear cut his person they do not have been hearing a mailing about. how we get money here is not political speech thank you what do you plan to do and how he's coming to top post doctrines must be abolished we cannot overturn a good republican that is and still allow wealthy individuals just didn't have enough money. thank. you all so easily he would have been high it was all my. month last round at the power monopolies have you noticed people are like this double our society should we get treated like last year with the excuse that someone's got to lose with some pu

the dred scott opinion of the supreme court was supposed to be compromised, resolving the issue of slavery. they had tried and tried and tried to compromise. it had not worked and that is why the crisis came. if one nation sharing the same congress, operating under the same laws, could not compromise the issue, how could two nations side-by-side, sharing these vital arteries of commerce and communication, how could they hope to resolve the issue? and what's more, lincoln understood that if secession managed one success there would not be illogical into it. we tend to look back and think of the north and the south. but in those days, the terrain of the country was much more complicated. in new york, where the tides were very close to the south because new york was the financial hub of this vast cotton industry in the south. they were already by 1862 talking about leaving the country and setting up what they called an independent freeport, like the city of hamburg in what is now germany. out in the midwest, they were more closely connected to new orleans then to new england. their farm produ

like plessy versus ferguson to dred scott in other cases and more recently with citizens united. members of congress were dealing with conflicts of interest and dealing with lobbyists but there's a fantastic new spielberg movie, lincoln that is spot on and shows lincoln basically bribing unsavory corrupt members of congress to get votes but like it was willing to twist arms to do business with those folks to get the 13th amendment passed in 1865 to end slavery. who among us would not stoop to in this horrible abomination so lobbyists, you find the same kind of drama in the same kind of story and same kind of struggles. first families have to raise children in what is essentially a public fishbowl. is difficult to raise kids, difficult to be married and difficult to hold a job and balance your life and find harmony imagine doing it at the white house where everything you do is public information? we saw a early families bringing children into the building and grandchildren into the building and struggling with it as well. >> i have a brief question and then a comment. the question

docket and they've someti s sometimesered on the side of caution and has embarrassed the country in dred scottin pace, alabama, in 1883 and ferguson in 1886. they have also done the right thing with browned v. board in '54, loving v. virginia in '67. so we're hopeful that they will do the right thing again with the marriage equality cases that they have taken up with doma and prop 8 but also with affirmative action and voting rights act this year. they have an opportunity to really redeem the republican party from their shellacking that they suffered in november as a result of the loss of president obama. if the republican appointed justices err on the side of equality and equality before the law, equality under the law, something decided long ago when we rats fid the 13th amendment to the constitution 147 years ago, then we will be well on our way to having a society that we can debate ideas and no longer debating basic fairness. >> paris, quickly, do you feel an extra sense of burden to the fact that as role models now, to young african-american men, that you have to help break stereotypes o

reactionary of all time, i have criticisms with the roberts court but this is the court that brought us dred scott. these are really horrible decisions, and far worse than anything that this supreme court could come up with. so i don't think this is a more political or more right wing court than it's ever been. i do think it's political, and i do think it's considerable. >> i think at the same time it is the most activist court in hoyt, and my colleague at syracuse university has a book on this, what he has shown is that the modern court is the most activist in terms of striking down popularly enacted laws than the warren court or any court before. so in that sense the court is getting involved in issues that the american people have spoken on, issues they want, and the court has said, no, and both at the state level and federal level. that's may account for why the court's public approval ratings have declined in the last decade or so, because of their willingness to get involved in the big issues and overturn decisions the american people want. so, maybe activist is a better word than politicize