free, the community always wanted drm 3 and we made a guess that if we took drm off of those books it would have a limited impact. at the end of the day it has had a limited impact because i believe that community of readers and writers self police. i believe that they are actually, if somebody puts a book up, other readers and authors get after them to take it down. we have the very wide takedown program, we do a lot of take downs, we have not seen a huge wrapup and in privacy since we went drm rebut some of that may well be the fact of that particular genre. it is and exercise that we keep in. there is the value to drm 3 in that the danger for all consumers and everybody in publishing, the whole environment is substantial. to have the biggest environment, free would be better if everybody could read every book and every device would be better for the consumer, better for authors, publishers. >> moving to children's books. the children the market has continued to grow and through the downturn economy it was really the green spot, the nice spot in bookselling and it is still moving. i

launch your drm at legalzoom today. call us. here to help. >>> position ythink you only h worry aboupaying off your student loans or your kids' loans? think again. lawmakers are picking up theab for their staff college debt, 21 million bks last year alone. and guess who is paying for it? you. gary, is this fair? >> it's not fair to anyone. i don't understand it. look, government service is a career cice. and if you think it's easy to get a job in government, you ould try to come to washington, d.c.. these jobs here at every level, even if they're unpaid swern ships, are highly coveted. why? because when compared with the private sector, they're working less hours a paid more if you include health care and all thosother nefits. if we had trouble attracting people to d.c. to work this government, i'd say, yeah, we need to increase the benefits. we don't. it's then that sits. we have morehan enough supply out there to meet the demand. and the taxpayer should not be on the hook for one who amore benefit. >> that's the basic argument

launch your drm at legalzoom today. call us. help. ♪ john: one reason i am not that upset yet about the nsa tracking my phone calls is that i have alrey given up much of my privacy. facebook has access to all kinds of private informational tommy. but they're is a big difference between facebook, youtube, and the government. facebook cannot tell me or assassinate me. the government might. if you're not doing anything wrong you hav nothing to worry about say some people, but brandon mayfield and his daughter did nothing wrong. they live in ogon and never been to spain. after terrorist's bomb trains in spain the fbi became convinced that brandon's fingerpri was on the bag of detonators down at the scene. what followed was a nightmare. >> i was in school on that day, may 6, 2004. qaeda picked up by my older brother, called into the office. he told me in a grim voice, let's go outside right now. i said, what's going on? he said, let's jusgo outside. i walked outside and looked at me and said, dad was arrested by the fbi. i was in tot

launch your drm at legalzoom today. call us. we're here to help.rles: the facebook ceo is facing a ton of criticism. mark zuckerberg at the heaof a grouof 100 tech titans pushing congress for immigration reform. same in a looser immigration rules we can get more skilled immigrants to come to this country. these folks are trying to help themselves instead of really fixing the problem. explain. >> these compani are thinking about themselves, not necessarily for the solution for the country. wthey are looki at an increase whh in the current senate bill tas to 115,000. this gives them an opportunity to froan expansive pool of not only american workers business case for an workers' this helps theme more competitive in terms of bringing people into their companies that can ge them innovative ideas that can help them in access to the compies. but the embassy group is airing very different message to conservatives saying this is a conservative plan that the senate is proposing and as we know the conservatives are literally, except for bill o'reilly, rollin

he lost the job of his drms and had to go to russia of all places, yet he uses that opportunity, makes most of it, and it really resurrects his political service career and it puts him on track to be presiden i was drawn to their stories. >> as a presidential historian, you're talking about one of the great presidents. you're talking about one of the pivotal moments in american history. when you look at what is happening right now in washington, d.c. with this president, this congress, this senate, give us your comparison, your thoughts,our emotions on the contrast. >> well, what strikes me about today is how heavy laden that the bureauccy is. everybody is hiding behind the person above them or bow them. there's a bureaucracy. when john quincy adams was a diplomat to russia, he communicated dectly with the president of the uned states through letters, and directly through letters to the secretary of state. we've lo a lot of that. i think that's the difference. communication was ry slow, it would take weeks for letters to go by ip, but it's instant today, yet theeaucracy really does see

what if a company invests to develop a service that to allownts the drm users to extract a 32nd segment of online video for fair use of the user's certified, that if they will use the trunk and the trans form of matter. that would be non infringement of the development and use. then let's say other actors come away -- come along and we purpose that. they somehow reverse engineer the platform and build upon the investment in circumvention to make a tool that can be used. protecting the content creates real challenges when circumvention can occur for non- infringement purposes. one solution to that is the owner of the content actually enables users to make a fair use is so there is no need in the first place for anyone to come up with circumvention. i believe we should not embrace this until we think more carefully about the costs of distinguishing between circumvention technologies. to add to that real quick, going from a policy idea to our role is a very difficult thing. i know a lot of policy ideas i would like. turning it into our role is another matter. but we have to understand is w

what if the company invest that circumvent the drm like to lew.com or netflix to allow you to extract a 302nd and piece of video but they say they will use that in a transformative manner? that talks about the distribution of the other actors come along to repurchase that to take the source code to reverse engineer the platform and build on the circumvention to make a tool. of the distinguishing between circumvention and the measures of protecting the fat content creates real challenges when it could have been for those purposes but the owner of the content enables users to make fair use so there is no need for anyone to come up with a circumvention because there is already ways to make a fair use but we should raise sat approach with the cost of distinguishing between the two. >> just to add to that, going from a policy idea is a difficult thing i know lots of policy ideas but what we have to understand is as we start to craft legislation, firms are not recipients of regulation. as soon as people know what rules there are they want to exploit them, they will. the idea seemed like a g

drm about that tiramisu. what a night, huh? but, um, can the test drive be over now?ck to the dealership? oh, yeah. [ male announcer ] it's practically yours. [ wife ] sorry. [ male announcer ] but we still need your signature. volkswagen sign then drive is back. and it's never been easier to get a passat. that's the power of german engineering. get $0 down, $0 due at signing, $0 deposit, and $0 first month's payment on any new volkswagen. visit vwdealer.com today. on any new volkswagen. a meal like thiso save on fast from walmartd dinners. costs less that $3.50 per serving. and if a family of four like yours switches out fast food dinner just once a week you can save over $690 a year. unbelievable. it's believable. save on a kraft dinner backed by the low price guarantee. walmart ... you thought wrong. seize the summer with up to 50% off hotels at travelocity. [ dog ] we found it together.upbeat ] on a walk, walk, walk. love to walk. yeah, we found that wonderful thing. and you smiled. and threw it. and i decided i would never, ever leave it anywhere. because that wo

[laughter] to do that dmca prohibits consumers from deactivating the drm software or other protections designed to prevent access to digital copyright in the work. it wasn't until about 10 years ago that anyone thought the dmca might apply when a consumer unlocked his phone but the dmca swept up cell phone unlocking through a technicality. locking of the cell phone prevents access to software in the phone such as the mobile operating system. when it is used on a new carrier's network. so if you unlock a cell phone technically you are circumventing a technological measure to use dmca's word even though no one think of unlocking a phone is the equivalent to piracy. fortunately they contain an out for situations like this. the three year exemptions so consumers aren't subject to those dmca anticircumvention preventions and in fact in 2006 and again in 2009 that consumers could unlock their phones without fear of prosecution. but the third time wasn't the charm. last but over the library declined to extend for cell phone unlocking and as a result the consumer who unlocks his mobile device

to do that they prohibit consumers from deactivating the drm software or other protections designed to prevent access to digital copyrighted work. it wasn't until 10 years ago but anyone thought the dmca might apply when the consumer unlocks his phone. but the dmca swept up cell phone blogging through technicality. locking of the cell phone prevents access to software such as the mobile operating system. when it's used in the new carrier's network. and so if you unlock a cell phone technically you are circumventing a technological measure to use the dmca's word even though nobody thinks unlocking a phone is the equivalent of piracy. fortunately the dmca continues with situations like this. a library of the library of congress just down the road who oversees the u.s. copyright office is entitled to grant three year exemptions so that consumers aren't subject to those dmca anticircumvention provisions and impact they did just that. in 2006 and again in 2009. so that consumers could unlock their phones without fear of prosecution. but the third time wasn't the charm. last but sober the li

when someone distributes on the internet a song. , the bill prohibits consumers from deactivating the drmoftware or other protections designed to prevent access to a judge -- to a digital work. the dmcayears ago, swept up cell phone unlocking through a technicality. locking of a cell phone prevent access to software and the phone, such as a mobile operating system, when it is used on a new carrier's network. you unlock a cell phone, and technically you're circumventing a technological wordse -- to use the bill -- even though nobody thinks that is the cook went of policy -- that is the equivalent of policy. the library of congress down the road, there is the u.s. copyright office, and it can grant three-year exemptions. the library and did just that in 2006. again in 2009. consumers could unlock their phones without fear of prosecution. the third time was not the charm. last october, the library declined to extend the exemption for cell phone unlocking. as a result, a consumer who unlocks his mobile device now can face civil and criminal penalties under copyright law, even if the contract

additionally it noted that congress may drm what legislative amendment is appropriate, end quote. despite opposition if the secretary of the treasury and the white house, here's the bipartisan answer to this problem. and we're glad to see that people on both sides, right, left, and center have all agreed that this is a proper measured step to solve this issue. as you can see this legislation solution is small, it's a technical fix to the dodd-frank act, but it's desperately needed and vital to maintain the integrity of domestic and global derivative market regulations and i urge swift passage of h.r. 742. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. ho seeks time? ms. moore: madam speaker, i'm seeking the time that mr. scott yielded to me before. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from wisconsin controls 10 minutes. the gentlelady is recognized. ms. moore: gep, i want to thank mr. scott an thank you, madam speaker, for recognizing me. i yield myself such time as i might consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady is recognized. ms. moore: i am so del