researcher dmytro drozdovsky of the institute of literature has been accused of plagiarism more than once, and there is a conclusion of the commission of the institute of literature that 60-64% of one of his scientific works is plagiarized. and the problem is that this andrew shepard, who allegedly translated the works of the irpin children together with dmytro drozdovsky, is a real translator. from russian and is the editor of the journal of the british-russian society "east-west review", this publication is a reflection of the views of the so-called good russians, that is, until now this publication remains a platform of representation of russian culture abroad. we are in touch with tamara gundarova, as i promised you, tamara gundarova is a literary critic of cultural studies. doctor of philology, a professor who currently teaches ukrainian literature at harvard. mrs. tamaro, welcome, good evening, good day. and tell me , please, how did you perceive this decision of the maksym rylsky award committee? i must say that i was not surprised, because the fact is that this story with roz

tamara, you wrote last week that drozdovsky remains a desirable person at the institute of literature, moreover, they are proud of him and perceive him as an unjust victim, how can this be? but you are talking about the fact that this is a cancer, this is the problem of tolerance of the ukrainian academy to plagiarism, but excuse me, i will ask you directly, what would happen if, for example, in the western academy, yes, in harvard, where you are now you teach, something similar happened, how would colleagues react to such facts, well, i will tell you this, that it is actually dishonesty. plagiarism is not only a purely ukrainian phenomenon, we constantly hear about these stories, and the recent story in harvard is a very loud story about the dismissal, about the fact that the president of harvard university was forced to resign from the post of president of harvard university, who was accused of plagiarism, this is very such a big scandal, but plagiarism happened very often, you understand what is meant by plagiarism, sometimes plagiarism... it is considered just such well-known phra

tamara, you wrote last week that drozdovsky is staying at the institute of literature a desirable personover, they are proud of him and perceive him as an unfair victim. how can this be, you are talking about the fact that this is a cancerous tumor, this is the problem of the ukrainian academy's tolerance for plagiarism. i'm sorry, i'll ask you directly, what would happen if, for example, in a western academy, for example, in harvard, where you teach now, something similar happened, how would colleagues react to such facts? well, i will tell you that in fact dishonesty and plagiarism are not only a purely ukrainian phenomenon, we we hear about these stories all the time, and the recent story at harvard, a very loud story about the dismissal, about the fact that the president of harvard university had to leave the position of president, who was accused of plagiarism, this is a very, very big scandal, but plagiarism it was discussed very often, you understand what is meant by plagiarism, sometimes plagiarism is considered to be simply such well-known phrases that you cannot paraphrase in o

the problem is that a literary critic, a researcher dmytro drozdovsky of the institute of literaturen accused of plagiarism more than once, and there is a conclusion of the commission of the institute of literature that 60.64% of one of his scientific works is plagiarized. and the problem. in the fact that this andrew shepard , who allegedly translated together with dmytro drozdovsky the works of the irpin children, is a translator really from russian and is... the editor of the journal of the british-russian society east-west review, this publication is a vernacular of the views of the so-called good russian , that is, until now this publication remains a platform for the representation of russian culture abroad, the position of a translator , editor of the universe, which drozdovsky remains, remains, you understand what is the matter, when this story with plagiarism began, at our institute, i will simply remind, during the discussion of dmytro drozdovsky's dissertation, which was completed was in the doctoral program of our institute, er, the fact of borrowing was discovered, er, a

the prize was awarded, in particular , to dmytro drozdovsky, a scientist, literary critic, and andrewto the translator from russian for the translation into english of the collection of texts by the irpin children, irpin is my home. the problem is that literary critic, researcher of the institute of literature dmytro drozdovsky was accused of plagiarism more than once, and there is a conclusion of the commission of the institute of literature that in one of his scientific works 60-64 drozdovsky works of the irpin children, is a translator really from russian and is the editor of the journal of the british-russian society east-west review, this publication is a reflection of the views of the so-called good russians, that is, until now it leads. nya remains a platform for the representation of russian culture abroad, and we have tamara gundarova in touch, as i promised you, tamara gundarova is a literary critic, cultural researcher, doctor of philology, a professor who currently teaches ukrainian literature at harvard. ms. tamara, welcome, good evening, good day, please tell me how you

everything would be fine, but the public debate is that dmytro drozdovsky is a person who has been caught plagiarizing several times, and it was more than once, he knows about it. academic community, and now dmytro rozdovsky is receiving the rylsky prize, moreover, bohdan stasyuk, another translator, wrote on facebook about who andrew shepard is, who together with drozdovsky is receiving the rylsky prize, and it turned out that, among other things, the translator andrew shepard is the editor of the british-russian magazine, of the british-russian society east-west review. on the cover of the first issue for the past year of this publication, you can see a portrait of nikolai vtorov with children on a faberge egg and a lily of the valley, so this is it, this is what you see, these lily of the valley, actually, this is the collection of the sanctioned russian oligarch vekselberg, no i want to moralize, we are actually talking about... and about awards, and my first question to you, rossislav, is how should we treat such a story with this award, how should we react on this, or simply wait fo

and now dmytro drozdovsky is receiving the rylsky prize. moreover, bohdan stasiuk, another translator, wrote on facebook about who andrew shepard is, who, together with drozdovsky, receives the rylsky prize. and it turned out that, among other things, the translator andrew shepard is the editor of east western view, a magazine of the british-russian, british-russian society. on coated on the first of last year of this edition, and yes, you can to see a portrait of nikolai vtorov with children on a fabberge egg and a lily of the valley, so this is it, this is what you see, these lily of the valley, actually, this is the collection of the sanctioned russian oligarch vekselberg, and i don’t want to moralize, we are actually talking about literature and about awards and... my first question, rossislav, is how should we react to such a story with this award, should we somehow react to it, or simply wait for such state awards to go away together with the generation of people who received them represent, well, that a bad story, especially since th

want to remind you that during the 17th or 18th in that year, i also wrote an article about how drozdovsky, who was at that time language consultant is killing the field of science, destroying the field of ukrainian science. so actually it's just a repetition of this these these promotions, i think to myself, you see, the question for me, i really like the fact that i'm very glad that you are discussing the actual issue of bonuses today, uh, because it seems to me, the issue with bonuses in general, it is very difficult in ukraine today, starting from shevchenkivska and rylsky and so on, i do not think that the rylsky prize, that this story killed the rylsky prize, absolutely. no, because the name, because she bears the name of rylsky, as well as the reputation of rylsky, nothing and no one ever, especially druzdovsky and his company, they cannot undermine it , it is about what should be done, how to get out of this situation, and it seems to me, for example, that i even i myself wanted to write such a public letter of appeal regarding these awards, well , for example, to take the award, n