record number 2016-014004 drp at 2865 vallejo street, a request for discretionary review. >> good evening again, commissioners. david lindsey, department staff. the project at 2865 vallejo street includes interior renovations, a horizontal addition at the rear, and a new partial fourth story to be constructed above the three story single-family house. the subject property is on the south side of vallejo street between baker and broderick in the cow hollow neighborhood. it occupies a streeply up sloping lot measuring 25 feet wide by 136.5 feet deep. the zoning is rh-1(d) for detached. the main front wall of the house is set back 39 feet from the main property line with a single story -- [please stand by for captioner switch] concerns raised in the application are summarized as follows. >> inconsistent with the design guidelines. the project is out of scale with neighbouring buildings and would block views and violate privacy of neighbouring buildings and the project if approved would create a dangerous precedent for the neighbourhood. the residential developer considered the questions cons

commissioners, that'll place us on your discretionary review calendar for item 13, 2015018225 drp. please note on december 17, after hearing public comment, you continued this matter to january 11, 2018 with commissioner christine johnson being absent on january 11. without hearing, you continued this matter to today. commissioner johnson, you were not a commissioner at that time of the original hearing, but in order to participate today, you'll need to being acknowledge that you've reviewed the previous hearing and materials. >> i have. >> great. thank you. there'll first be a staff report, but then, this being the third second hearing, three and one. >> yes. three for both sides, no reb t rebuttal, and one minute public comment. >> good morning, i'll keep this short. [ inaudible ] -- the commission continued the item with the feedback to explore addition of an accessory dwelling unit on the property and reduction in the roof deck size at the front. the plans included in your packet dated february 12, 2018 have responded to both of these comments by substantially reducing the fron

case number 2013.0254 drp at 56 mason street. >> good afternoon, commissioners. alexander kirby with department staff. item before you is a request for discretion year review for window restoration and alterations at 56 mason street located at the southeast intersection of mason street at eddy street within an rc-4 street. the building is listed as a contributory building -- [ inaudible ] under article 11 as well as a contributor to the tenderloin district on the national register. the building is a four story mason ry apartment hotel typical to the surrounding neighbor. the legal use of the property is a residential hotel with 41 is single occupancy units and commercial spaces at the ground story. the proposed scope of work under the permit is for the restoration of 75 existing windows on the upper three floors of the two primary facades along mason and eddy streets, and the replacement. nonhistoric storefront along eddy street, the east frontage. neither this apartment nor previously approved permits seek to change the legal use of the property. the request for

item number 16, record number 2015-009015 drp-03, at 7577-79 to 81 leland avenue, request for discretionary review. >> the item before you is a request for discretionary review for the proposed project at 7577 and 79 through 81 leland avenue proposed along through contiguous lots. lot 030 is located along leland avenue. lot 007 b proposed for a subdivision is behind lot 030 and within the rh-1 zoning district. the project is to construct two new single-family homes at 75 and 77 leland avenue, as well as to construct a mixed use three story building at 79 through 81 leland avenue. the prime concerns include midblock open space, shadow, privacy, loss of visual openness, reduction in natural light and air as well as concerns about the easement dictating the building design at 79 through 81 leland avenue and the afore mentioned conflicting with the established character of the commercial corridor respectively. the project sponsor has responded to the requests are that encourage the project sponsor to continue pulling the massing of the single-family homes at 75 and 77 leland avenue as forward a