druckenmiller: i would amplify geoff's health,. i would never forget as the sequester was on funding, both sides of the aisle were not going to balance the budget on the backs of our seniors. so, then they cut infrastructure spending. that is all flint, michigan is. we are talking about an infrastructure problem. bridges and roads. we did not even know what caused cancer until about six years ago and how it happened. massive breakthroughs, we can genetically sequenced and targeted drugs. now what is going on, we are having our nigh grants cut to do cancer research. so much crowding out. geoff mentioned the other main problems. but i mean, hillary this morning talked about medicaid for children. and the effect on toxic stress and the other things going on. you saw it, they are getting $.08 for children and the elderly are getting $.56. can we just give them a little bit of the pie? because frankly, to invest in a five or six or three year old, they pay off is a lot better than to invest in an 85-year-old. i might feel different and

druckenmiller: i would amplify the health comment. as the sequester was unfolding, both sides of the aisle were not going to balance the budget on the back of our seniors. so they cut infrastructure spending. that is often michigan is. that's -- that's all flint, michigan is. we're talking about infrastructure problem. i've been on the border memorial sloanrd of my memorial kettering for years. we didn't even know really what caused cancer until about six years ago and how it happened. massive breakthroughs. we can genetically sequence drugs. now, we are having our nih grants cut at sloan-kettering to do cancer research. so much crowding out. geoff mentioned the other main problems. hillary talked about medicaid for children and the effect on toxic stress and other things on kids. you saw it. they are getting eight cents and the elderly are getting $.56. can we at least make it 12 or something? give them a little bit of the pie. frankly, to invest in a 5, 6, 3-year-old, to me, the payoff is a lot bigger than to invest in an 85-year-ol

druckenmiller: i would amplify the health comment. as the sequester was unfolding, both sides of the aisle were not going to balance the budget on the back of our seniors. so they cut infrastructure spending. that is often michigan is. we're talking about infrastructure problem. memorial on the border for 25 years. we didn't even know really what caused cancer until about six years ago and how it happened. massive breakthroughs. we can genetically sequence drugs. now, we are having our nih grants cut at sloan-kettering to do cancer research. so much crowding out. f mentioned the other main problems. hillary talked about medicaid for children and the effect on toxic stress and other things on kids. you saw it. they are getting eight cents and the elderly are getting $.56. can we at least make it 12 or something? give them a little bit of the pie. frankly, to invest in a 5, 6, 3-year-old, to me, the payoff is a lot bigger than to invest in an 85-year-old. i may feel differently in 23 years. those are the major issues i would highlight.