dscc did not have the budget to do that. dscc today is smaller than it was in 2005 and the agency did not have at that time in my view is sufficient resource commitment to this kind of their regulatory program. >> last question for both the do you and chair bair. we heard testimony from a gentleman named kyle bass who did extensive work identifying the fundamental weaknesses and securitized assets based on sub-prime mortgages. he took that the evidence of the danger it presented to bear stearns and was told it was rejected. he took it to the federal reserve board and it was rejected. did he bring that evidence to epd sec which would have had a clear provincial interest door to the fdic in giffi didn't bring it directly were you aware of this research? >> i am not aware of that and i would be happy to find out and provide that information. >> now i am not aware of that though 6 cents bear stearns is not a sufficient suppository institution i would not be aware of it. >> senator graham. >> thank you mr. chairman. earlier today