this woman, known for legal reasons as dsd, was the first to report being attacked byjohn worboys backt believe you? i'd like to throw that one back at the police because all the evidence was there. all the witnesses were there, everything was there, why didn't you believe me? why did you put me through this for 15 years? you get to the point where you think, you are going mad. from when that first report was made, it took a further six years for police to bring warboys to justice. during that time, he continued to cruise the streets looking for women to dupe, drug, and sexually assault. the police can't be sued for negligence, so dsd and another of worboys‘ victims claimed police failures to investigate breached article three of the human rights act and amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. the metropolitan police, with the backing of two home secretaries, fought them to the supreme court. but today, judges ruled in the women's favour. we have held that failures in the investigation of the crimes, provided they are sufficiently serious, will give rise to liability on the part o

this woman, known for legal reasons as dsd, was the first to report being attacked byjohn worboys backdo you think the police simply didn't believe you? i would like to throw that one back at the police, because all of the evidence was there. there was a witness as there. everything was there. why did you believe me? why have you put me through this for 15 years? you get to the point where you think, you are going mad. from that first report it took a further six years for police to bring john worboys to justice. during that time he continued to cruise the streets, looking for women to dupe, drug, sexually assault. the police can't be sued for negligence, so dsd and another ofjohn worboys‘ victims claimed police failures to investigate breached article three of the human rights act, and amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. the metropolitan police, with the backing of two home secretaries, fought them to the supreme court. but todayjudges ruled in the women's favour. we have heard that failures in the investigation of the crimes provided they are sufficiently serious will give r

this woman, known for legal reasons as dsd, was the first to report being attacked byjohn worboys backn 2003. why do you think the police simply didn't believe you? ad like to throw that one back at the police because all the evidence was there. all the witnesses were there, everything was there, why didn't you believe me? why did you put me through this for 15 years? you get to the point where you think, you are going mad. from when that first report was made, it took a further six years for police to bring worboys to justice. during that time, he continued to cruise the streets looking for women to dupe, drug and sexually assault. the police can't be sued for negligence, so dsd and another of worboys' victims claimed police failures to investigate breached article three of the human rights act and amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. the metropolitan police, with the backing of two home secretaries, fought them to the supreme court. but today, judges ruled in the womens' favour. we have held that failures in the investigation of the crimes, provided they are sufficiently seri

this woman, known for legal reasons as dsd, was attacked by worboys in 2003, was the first to reportpolice. i put my trust in the police. i went to them for them to sort this out. i knew who had attacked me. i didn't know his name, but i knew who was responsible for this. they had all the information there. they should have caught him, they could have stopped him the very next day but they didn't. they chose to not believe me. if they had done theirjob in 2003, there would be one victim. i can deal with one victim. what i can't deal with one victim. what i can't deal with one victim. what i can't deal with is 105 victims because i wasn't believed. worboys was able to continue to attack women until he was finally brought to justice in 2009. dsd and another of worboys‘ victims brought a legal challenge, claiming the police failures breached their human rights and amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. the metropolitan police fought them to the supreme court. today, the court ruled in the women's favour. we have held that failures in the investigation of the crimes, provided they

o> reporter: what is the message meu want to send to young black dsds who are seeing this? think-- i mean, number one, is to give them a good time at the movies. nu reporter: yes. mission accomplished. >> a lot of times that's overlooked, the value of being able to go to a movie with your iriends, watch something for two and a half hours and coming out rs aing exhilarated and the next day at school pretending to be the characters, drawing the baracters, dressing up as them for halloween. a lot of that is overlooked. tor me it was about my own realization it's okay to be proud to be african. you should be proud to be african. everybody should be proud of their own heritage, but oupecially us. >> reporter: at the end of the day you said it. you said, "i just want to make a good movie." >> that's all and that's so difficult to do to be able to accomplish that and that's enough, i think. >> glor: love that quote. you can see gayle's entire interview with ryan coogler this isnday on the cbs news. and steve hartman is next with a serial snail mailer. [ dog groans ] [ coughs and s

. >> a special workout at dsd boxing gym.d champ danny garcia was there set to box in the welter weight title. he'll take on former champion brandon rios. >> much more still ahead: the exclusive accuweather forecast. >> taking a live look right now through our sky6 camera in center city at the skyline. meteorologist adam joseph will have details of you were weekend ahead when we come right back. >> ♪ pennsylvania is getting the law requires many to get their child abuse clearances. are you one of them? if you're a coach sunday school teacher a scout leader camp counselor many people who work or volunteer with children may need their clearances. pennsylvania means business when it comes to protecting our children. thank you pennsylvania! find out if you need to get your clearances by going to keepkidssafe.pa.gov paid for with pennsylvania taxpayer dollars. >> take a look at this. the midwest is getting slammed with a huge snowstorm. in michigan snowy roads caused several crashes. in chicago more than a thousand flights have be

dsd and another warboys' victims brought a legal challenge claiming claiming the police failures breachedupreme court. today, the court ruled in the women's favour. we have held that failures in the investigation of crimes, provided they are sufficiently serious, will give rise to liability on the part of the police. and we have further found that there were such serious deficiencies in this case. today's landmark ruling has huge implications for both of violent crime and the police who investigate it. if they seriously fail in an investigation, they can face human rights actions by the victim and have to pay out compensation. today's judgment can't make up for the police errors in investigating john worboys. but it will put real pressure on them to ensure such mistakes don't happen again. the project to build africa's biggest hydroelectric dam on the river nile is threatening to provoke a major conflict between some of the countries affected. the dam is being built by ethiopia, and sudan says it welcomes the prospect of cheaper power. but the egyptians are deeply unhappy — fearing the fl

this woman, known for legal reasons as dsd, was attacked by worboys in 2003, and was the first to reportn the police. i went to them for them to sort this out. i knew who had attacked me. i didn‘t know his name, but i knew who was responsible for this. they had all the information there. they should have caught him, they could have stopped him the very next day but they didn‘t. they chose to not believe me. if they had done theirjob in 2003, there would be one victim. i can deal with one victim. the metropolitan police fought them to the supreme court. today, the court ruled in the women‘s favour. we have held that failures in the investigation of the crimes, of violent crime and the police who investigate it. if they seriously fail in an investigation, they can face human rights actions by the victim, and have to pay out compensation. it‘s looking at things where perhaps article 3 isn‘t engaged. do we have to move resources from those sort of investigations, so things like fraud, into supporting more work around serious crime? crowd chants: domestic violence is a crime! today‘s judgment

compensation was awarded to dsd and nbv.any compensation that had paid would not be sorted. the main area of dispute was the nature of the positive obligation imposed by article three of the convention. in particular, the question arose as to weather that obligation relates only to systemic failures on the part of the police, or weather it also includes failures in the conduct of the investigation. the supreme court unanimously dismisses the commissioner's appeal. there was disagreement between us as to whether a liability under the human rights act arose only due to systemic failures or whether efficiency is in the actual investigation of the offences would be enough to make the police libel. by be enough to make the police libel. bya be enough to make the police libel. by a majority, we have held that failures in the investigation of the crimes, provided they are sufficiently serious, will give rise to liability on the part of the police. and we further found that there were such serious efficiencies in this case. there we

this woman, known for legal reasons as dsd, was attacked by worboys in 2003, was the first to reportrust in the police. i went to them for them to sort this out. i knew who had attacked me. i didn't know his name, but i knew who was responsible for this. they had all the information there. they should have caught him, they could have stopped him the very next day but they didn't. they chose to not believe me. if they had done theirjob in 2003, there would be one victim. i can deal with one victim. what i can't deal with is 105 victims because i wasn't believed. worboys was able to continue to attack women until he was finally brought to justice in 2009. dsd and another of worboys‘ victims brought a legal challenge, claiming the police failures breached their human rights and amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. the metropolitan police fought them to the supreme court. today, the court ruled in the women's favour. we have held that failures in the investigation of the crimes, provided they are sufficiently serious, will give rise to liability on the part of the police. and we