but i will say this, that the dseir is severely flawed. and we will tell you why in writing. i will outline now only a series of some of the flaws and you've heard hints from these things from other speakers. first, we will discuss the failure of the dsir to accurately address the secondary impacts caus caused by the lossf existing housing, including impacts on transit, lyft and uber drivers. second, we will discuss the failure to take into consideration the cumulative transportation impacts of the projected increase and city college enrollment. there's an increase as the dseir correctly notes of, i think 26% to 56% over the next few years and fails to take that into consideration. next, the dseir fails to mention that city college has an agreement and will undertake to have 500 hu 500 units on the eat basin. in addition, the consideration of the building of the paec and steam building is going go on simultaneously and the dsir does not take into consideration the tremendous environmental problems caused by a simultaneous construction on the east basin and west basin, which w