dtna is a great supporter of the diverse night life in our neighborhood. we supported trigger when they came to us two years ago seeking approval to expand and open. and we continue to support their existence. we have been very reasonable in our dealings with trigger. a few months before their initial application we went through a process with the cafe across the street where the neighborhood -- we'd hatted some problems with them -- we'd had some problems with them and the neighborhood groups wrote the conditions of use for the cafe. there were 47 conditions of use for that establishment. when trigger came along, we felt that the project sponsor had a reasonably good track record and there were only 24 conditions imposed upon him and they were all very reasonable, but unfortunately, that comes to the issue of sound vibration and this project sponsor has continuously failed to comply. the entertainment commission has sent people out to do sound checks on numerous occasions and every single one has been failed. there has been some improvement in some areas,

i am a member of the dtna and have lived across from trigger for approximately seven years. when i moved into the residence, there was no bar open. soon after a bar named detour opened and there was never any problem. around 2006 a new operator reopened the bar and this bar quickly became a nuisance receiving many complaints. mainly complaints from neighbors and went in different directions either to the police, the commission e the neighborhood association, and eureka neighborhood association, and supervisors and others. they were put on notice and continued to fail sound inspections. later, some time later in 2008, the same operator reopened jet bar and to the adjoining building and renamed it trigger. the new club is bigger, had a larger sound system, and had an open type of city scape garage door which acted as an amplifier to the noise. this is nothing new. again, the club was going to be put on notice. they received 164 complaints to the police department. and i think kindness matters and i think it's important to keep the community thriving and especially in a recessi

we received a letter from hbna who generally supports the project but has concerns shared by dtna and the market and octavia cac. those concerns include the inclusion very good at not being located on site. they support the original parking keeling which that was contained in the -- parking q language that was contained in the mmrp that is somewhat diluted in its current form. the loading at 14th street should begin at 9:00 a.m. or later, not 7:00 a.m. or later as indicated in the mmrp. edna the generally supports the 9:00 a.m. loading time as well. the department also received several letters from residents in the neighborhood. many residents south of the side are concerned about the impact of the parking and loading on 14th and landers streets. they do not want large trucks driving down through their neighborhood. grocery store freeloading in their minds is inappropriate use in a low density residential neighborhood. most, however, support the overall project but are concerned about the adverse impacts of this large grocery store would have on their neighborhood. neighbors are conce

we received a letter from hbna who generally supports the project but has concerns shared by dtna and the market and octavia cac. those concerns include the inclusion very good at not being located on site. they support the original parking keeling which that was contained in the -- parking q language that was contained in the mmrp that is somewhat diluted in its current form. the loading at 14th street should begin at 9:00 a.m. or should begin at 9:00 a.m. or later, not 7:00 a.m. or later as