dtsc is screwed up. soil vapor extraction. 11 settleal can highlight areaos that where they are not following their own guidance. >> thank you. >> there is machine fest injustice you are being mislead boy dtsc and they are misrepresenting information if you give. >> and ask our experts the right questions >> thank you. >> thank you. >> appreciate the. >> say your name, sir. >> commissioner lemberg. >> sir, can you give mow a reminder on your name for the minutes. sorry. >> thank you. yes. thank you. >> thank you. my pon this matter is no secret. however, i you are hear on a resay different standard we have to address that. and -- i'm going to ask a question i >> president swig -- has there been new evidence since our august 16th hear thanksgiving would be presented that is not already presented? >> when you mean new evidence, there was evidence that was not shared with us this we did not have access to after the end of july. we submitted briefs. i understand. my question is has there been new information

now from dtsc and planning ceded 2 minutes you have time left. >> okay. . >> we will hear from dtsc, 5 minutes. >> my computer battery has 4. >> y are okay with this. soil vapor there is soil vipir site? they found no pc on this site billsod lines of evidence and six phases of investigation. pc was lected but e vice president ritd and on site as soil vipir. recognize this is is possible. but it is also possible and find its probable that pc u in site soil vapor yet to be identified off site source zones one evidence is the most concentrated prosecute benched in the sfreechlt from concentration contours of deer horizon most informative of source zones. showed that figure this evening. apart from this evidence there is historical information to consider. 10 historical dry clone exerts identified other ngz efficiency operations that may have used pc k. typical press for those businesses. from it. am precushionary principle assume multiple off site source zones rather than the opt mifkt or possible hypeoth premesis it was released on sxooit evaporated. exclusive proceeding one or more of

certainly this project you know, there were issues around conditions of soil and dtsc was involved. there are issues in that neighborhood. i don't think this is the right forum to address those right dtsc i think has been extremely cooperative. and the board or epa could could ask for hearings to talk about this issue. but holding up this project in response to that, i just think was the wrong place and a bit of an abuse of the of the process you know where there yet again to talk about a rehearing request. i don't think these should even be before the board of appeals. they're they're ministerial approvals but they are and you know there's not much the board of appeals can can actually even do when they're before them. so the outcome was right. but it obviously took it was costly for dc to go through this project process. it took a lot of time and money. so, you know, hopefully some of our housing element work in the rezoning work will, will, will talk about what's going to happen. so we don't we don't get these appeals . yeah, i was going to say maybe it can be part of a procedure