now, no, they are not asking dubinsky now, just like the rest of the citizens of ukraine or citizensuntries who are currently in our pre-trial detention centers or correctional colonies, they are not asking for a single surname. when you return our children from the occupied territories from the russian federation, it is through whose mediation, as of now agent. when bohdan yarmokhin returned, the key thing was that he recorded an appeal to volodymyr zelenskyi, did it work? no, i can't say that, when i talked with bohdan already after my return, i told him that for me it was the most difficult return, i spent so much time communicating with mediators to get you back, well, about that, it's probably possible. .. no one will find out, maybe someone will find out, when for sure, i don’t know, you can write a book, but after we return of all our ukrainian children, because there are so many details, who agreed, who put pressure on the russian side, because on the one hand there was a press conference of lviv and belova, where she publicly said that bohdan yermokhin never wanted to return

, dubinsky was once thought to be a journalist, or i will not channels to name, which ones are there,he common people they call it g + g, there is no journalism there, thank you, mr. viktor, mr. olezh, well, first of all, the vast majority of what is passed off as an investigation is not. are outpourings, are really low-quality, media activity that cannot be called an investigation. among what is an investigation, again, i trust, but i check, because even people with famous surnames can have situations when they are given a bar, even among the media, which are authoritative, they can often be used in the dark. and the key here is important, that journalism is about the fourth. and this also implies responsibility, and in particular for accusations and in particular for investigations , the author is also responsible for the fact that the data there are really verified, the sources there are reliable, and these accusations are not baseless , because it is always easier to blame than to be the one who makes excuses, and if journalists really recognize and know this responsibility, then

, dubinsky was also once thought to be a journalist, or i won't name the channels that are there, well common people they call it g + g, there is no journalism there. thank you, mr. viktor, mr. oleg, well, first of all, the vast majority of what is being published now. you can't, in the middle of what is an investigation, again , i trust, but i check, because even in people with imminent nicknames, there can be situations when they are given to the bar, even among the media, which are authoritative, often they can be used in the dark, and key it is important here that journalism is about... turning power, and this also implies responsibility, and in particular for accusations and in particular for investigations, the author is also responsible for the fact that the data there is really checked, the sources there are reliable, and these accusations are not are silent, because it is always easier to blame than to be the one who makes excuses, and if journalists really recognize and know this responsibility, they prepare high-quality investigations, and such investigations... then underli

, dubinsky was once thought to be a journalist, or i won't name the channels, which are there in theommon people of g +g. there is no journalism there. thank you, mr. victor. mr. oleg. well, first of all, the vast majority of what passes for investigation isn't , is fluff, really shoddy. ah media activity that cannot be called investigations . in the midst of what is an investigation, again, trust but verify. because even people with famous surnames can have situations when they are handed over to the barbell. even among media that are authoritative, they can often be used in the dark, and the key thing here is that journalism is about the fourth estate, and that also implies responsibility, and in particular for accusations and in particular for investigations, there is also the responsibility of the author for what the data is there really verified, the sources there are reliable, these accusations are not baseless, because it is always easier to blame. than to be the one who makes excuses, and if journalists really recognize and know this responsibility , then they prepare high-qu

you understand that the courts make decisions on such scandalous cases as dubinsky, shufrych, and willisions on such cases as lustration, the authorities, what do you think, if we allow citizens of the russian federation into the judicial system federation, what will we get at the end. you rightly said that yesterday's interview of the head of the supreme court, well, it's a shame, it's not just a shame from the point of view of his vision, the head of the supreme court could not even allow himself to formulate that it was a prince's decision, because it was a captive's decision. of the supreme court, in this way he devalued all his colleagues who made a decision after the notification, the official notification of the sbu, to take and remove lviv from the positions, that is, it was not the decision of the prince. when, for example, stefanchuk says that there are no votes in the verkhovna rada in favor of banning moscow priests, he simply attacks the credibility of the verkhovna rada. thus the head of the supreme court. with some of his statements, he essentially hit the image of the s

corruption and ending with treason, well, for example , we can mention pronestor shufrych, oleksandr dubinskyoleksandr ponomarov, again, the majority are representatives of the banned pro-russian party opz, but its proceedings are related to the people. that's why it seems to me that for some people 's deputies, the mandate is now more of a burden than some kind of protection, which as before guaranteed some kind of inviolability, what is the essence of this, you understand, that weight that cannot be lifted, well, look, it seems to me that now, let's say, for example, the last three people's... who gave up their mandates, it seems to me that it is easier for them to give up their mandate and do their usual business, not to be under close supervision mass media, the public, not to go to the verkhovna rada and to appear in anti-corruption investigations, it is easier to deal with one's own affairs in business, or , let's say, to run for jogs on the azure border. than to work in the parliament, look, there is another question about the rather scandalous nardepka maryana bezuglai, there was a pr

dubinsky twice during his stay abroad visited italy, croatia and spain. already five draft laws on mobilization have been registered in the verkhovna rada, one from the government, the other four people's deputies submitted as alternatives. the deadline for such initiatives has already expired, yaroslav zheliznyak, a people's deputy from the voice faction, said. now, according to the regulations, it is possible to start considering the law at the committee. a closed discussion of the draft law was held by the chairman of the verkhovna rada and representatives of parliamentary factions. the defense committee has begun, where a decision on the draft law will be made. to three, the number of victims increased due to yesterday's rocket attack in khmelnytskyi region. during the rescue work, they found another deceased, an elderly man. seer there was no contact with him yesterday, the man was supposed to be at the facility, two more people were injured, the mayor oleksandr semchyshyn said. elimination of the consequences of the attack in the city has been compl

justice. years, until last year a court in the netherlands found russian citizens igor girkin serhiy dubinsky and ukrainian citizen leonid kharchenko guilty of the crash of flight mh-17 and finally confirmed that the plane was shot down by a russian buk missile from the non-controlled territory of ukraine. the russian side still continues to claim that it was not involved in the downing of the mh-17 , despite the results of international investigations and the judges' decisions. returning to the circumstances of the fall of il-76 on the eve of the publication of teleg. draws attention to the fact that in the case of a plane crash of this scale, the consequences, in particular the bodies or fragments of the bodies of the dead, if there were more than 60 of them on board, could not disappear from the scene. the pictures from the crash site of the mzh-17 showed bodies among the wreckage, and but in the case of il-76, only one photo shows the body of the deceased. telegraph journalists write that russia should publish official photos and videos to confirm its words about the alleged presence of p

you understand that courts make decisions on such scandalous cases as dubinsky, shufrych, and will continuemake decisions on such cases as lustration, cleansing of power, do you think we will allow citizens of the russian federation into the judicial system, what will we get in the end? you rightly said that yesterday's interview with the chairman of the supreme court was a shame. it is not just a shame from the point of view of his vision, the head of the supreme court could not even allow himself to formulate that it was the decision of the prince, because it was the decision of the plenary session of the supreme court, thus he devalued all his colleagues, who made a decision after the notification, the official notification of the sbu, to take and remove lviv from their positions, that is... it was not a decision, a decision of the prince. when, for example, stefanchuk says that there are no votes in the verkhovna rada to ban moscow priests, he is simply attacking the verkhovna rada's credibility. thus , with such statements, the head of the supreme court , in fact, attacked the image of

during his stay abroad, dubinsky visited italy, croatia and spain twice.

different people, and that's why there is unity there there was no, and here is the situation with dubinsky now in prison, going to trial already. in the near future, also an indicative story, that is random, but here a question arises simply because earlier, when the ukrainian parliament was re-elected after the victory of president zelenskyi, it was said that the majority would make all decisions, when it constantly leaves the faction, this is not the case, look, it is possible right away, this is essential, which must be understood , monomajority, like any parliamentary coalition of the majority, is needed to create a government, and of course, as a political decision-making tool, but we have always never made decisions only by the votes of the majority or mono coalition the majority, the mechanism of the situational majority always worked first of all, once , let's say, many decisions were made only by the votes of the majority, especially in peacetime, during the war, well, all this went into the background altogether. now it is necessary to distinguish the legal mechanism of my majori

dubinsky, well, it would seem, well, this is a person, this is a mouthpiece, no, it is closed now, yeseft the chat, ihor valievich kalomutsky, drinking coffee somewhere in the center of kyiv, but in a gray building , such a cheerful, one-room apartment he has a one-room apartment, it seemed, well, ihor valeriovych, it’s deep down, who can close him, they closed him somehow, so maybe they’re just hiding him from the fbi, the fbi, just so that, well, i don’t think so, well, listen, we’re so dependent on of the united states. what if the question arises: guys, you either hand it over or you don't get any help, i think that the things will be collected personally by the general of the sbu, mr. ihor valeriovych, and sent to him on an official plane, so understand that it will be quick. mr. ivan, one more question, we have two minutes of time left, the former commandant already isolation, the executioner, kulikovsky, was found guilty, given 15 years, and in the end we observe from time to time they keep those who sympathize, support, help russia , give positions, lead and so on, and various