some unexpected things are announced to us, dubinsky is still under investigation, and then what are the options? i ask you because it is not known where derkach is and he is under sanctions, everything was known to the ukrainian special services for a long time, it is not known that the world... now dubinsky, although i think a lot of facts have been collected on it. i think that dubinsky will now play on the contradictions of our government with biden, on the fact that there will be a new president there, trump, i understand his desire and rhetoric for the future, but the facts really say that the criminal should be in prison and very long. and i would like all his rhetoric to remain within the boundaries of the court, well, the courtroom, but not go outside and not be discussed by the masses, because whatever he says, it is all exclusively propaganda, and not a single it should have no consequence. mr. viktor, about the kharkiv region and the investigation of the circumstances under which the russians were able to break through in the kharkiv region, in the north, in fact, private

i take it out there dubinsky uses everyone else, but in reality whether he has something or not, thease is igor kolomoisky's assets in the territory. money from a private bank, so it’s not just that the fbi got involved in this, opened an investigation, at one time i bought it, literally pulling out all the other guys, so i fully admit that it’s really all in the background everything that is happening around kolomoisky in ukraine, some kind of non-public division of his assets in america is going on. great question, i have a surprise for you, as always, a man who personally knows kolomoisky, in our studio, oleg naginsky, let's actually ask him, what is he like for real? “hello, oleg, we watched from behind our scenes, three different videos, where kolomoisky is real, this is closest to the real thing, and he is real everywhere, how is it, i’ll explain, you are in court, without knowing, discussing him, that he is nervous, but he is still a jew, and he talks with his hands and what you saw in court, this is the highest, here it is, the gesture that you are trying to tell me here, whe

suspected of treason, but despite this they still remain with the mandate, in particular oleksandr dubinsky and nestor shufrych still, yes while they are sitting in the pretrial detention center. they still have mandates and one more nardev from opz , oleksandr ponomarov, for example, a similar situation, so the announcement of suspicion, of course, does not mean that the people's deputy... automatically loses his mandate, but it is a certain reaction, which it could not be, in principle, and the fact that public actions and law enforcement agencies are taking place in response to such behavior, of course, gives some restrained optimism that the matter will not be hushed up, but at the same time we know that previous scandals, for example , again, which mykola tyshchenko had, they did not end with anything. that's why this case will move, we will watch, you know, today we had yevheniya kra kravchuk, a representative of the people's servants, and she was, i think, even outraged that we raised this topic, she said that mykola tyshchenko he was expelled from the faction a long time ago, he has

reading, accordingly, we understand that there is such a case, for example, as the case of oleksandr dubinskys the call sign pinocchio who is now suspected of treason, who for a moment represented the leading party of the servant of the people, and if with those who were members of the opz party, we understand plus or minus what kind of attitude towards him, what attitude towards these deputies in society, then towards the servants of the people, well there are people who trust this party and the president itself, don't we now have fears about possible hidden facts of this case, and that we will not learn about them if this bill is passed? in fact, right when this one... was voted in the first one readers, the movement honestly wrote its material about it, and we noted that we are against the adoption of such a text and such a law, because we keep, for example, a register of traitors, where we write down all political figures who in some way opposed the statehood of ukraine, we we record everything, and very often the auxiliary in this is precisely the court decision, because this is somethin

by no means objective, let's say, frankly, before the full-scale invasion of the latter. loved dubinsky'srograms, yes, that is , and actually these journalists, some of them, they managed to express in their biography and now they feel good, so i can't even say that everything is fine with the institute of reputation in the journalistic environment, maybe after all, then the codes should work as codes, so here i think, look, our society is a bit traumatized, we are afraid of pressure on journalists, yes, that is, in unfortunately, there have been murders of journalists in our history, we remember. heorhiy gongadze, but he was not the only one like that, and in our country we constantly talk about the fact that there public law enforcement agencies can put pressure on journalists, so obviously this is such a fine line, to which our society is not sure what it is ready for, but the parliamentary committee probably has the answer, how not to cross this line and that on the one hand the law works, and on the other hand there is no under the cover of codes, and massacre or not to run after jou