this is what i remember, jana, that at the last hearing miss dubrovsky's attorney and her neighbor's attorney came before us and talked about how the mediation process was going really well. they stated that at a couple hearings at least and they talked about how sure they were that there was going to be a resolution for this. and so when we granted that, you know, 6 months extension it was based on that assurance that parties were coming to the table and dealing with this. so that's what i remember, jana, from how this all came to us. i would be open to be corrected by any of my fellow commissioners or jana and that i do not believe that not -- that rehearing this would harm you in any way. if we stick to our original plan of giving it till december to see if you guys can work it out, it does not harm you in any way. so i read what your attorney has submitted, i don't see any new evidence. all of the points that she's making are restatements that i have heard in this body in the past so i really don't see it and i don't see how it would harm you that the decision that this body has

>> my name is alla dubrovsky and i am owner of record. >> i just wanted to confirm. thank you. >> commissioners. >> so your attorney couldn't make it today? >> the hearing was scheduled on very short notice and she has conflict between clients, so --. >> didn't you request the rehearing? >> yes. >> but she couldn't make it. >> she couldn't make it because another hearing, she has to appear in court where it's impossible to cancel. she has more than one client. >> you understand, have you attended any of the past hearings? >> not all of them but, yes, i attended some of them. >> commissioners, i see here that the request for rehearing was received on october 5th and i was just checking my emails right now and it seems it me that we discussed rescheduling this meeting to today on october 3rd. so when you submitted it, i'm sure we must have told you that the date of the hearing was today. isn't that correct? would that be --. >> no, when we submitted the request for rehearing we didn't know when the rehearing will be scheduled for. i understand the process we ask for a

. >> for opponent dubrovsky. i'm reporting that since the last meeting we had a survey done in order to assess the topography that had changed at the next property, at the wong's property. that survey has been done and the plans are being drawn up. the new plans, in order to reflect what the new topography is on the neighboring property. and we have our engineer here who is ready to answer any questions mr. javier who has drawn up the plans or is in the process of doing is according to the survey that he conducted. so, the schedule is once the plans are done, which is expected to be done within the next week or two, then they will go through the building department and then our judge, the arbitrator in the case, is standing ready to fine tune the last details. however, prior to that, i and opposing counsel have a meeting scheduled for next week, but not specified the date, but we're working on that date. so, pretty much the project is moving forward. so, we are asking for a further continuance to allow us to get