agreed to the point that they are simply refuting themselves, well, what is it, former deputy state duma markovenerally agreed to ingenious things that are simply a person who knows at least a little about the history of some warriors. she just bangs her head on the table like this and says, "oh my god, the losses are three times greater, and this is stupidity, which has no confirmation in history ." look at the data about the second world war and so on. there are always more losses among those who suffer defeat . air war than the german one, they held victory and the germans suffered, they were defeated, they argued with our military actions, they died not at all, much more, approximately the same 8 1/2 to 7 million, well, you understand, even history, they changed it differently, but everything was not so , well, that is, obvious things, people start to fantasize in order to somehow justify their nonsense that they are saying today , meanwhile, their military experts are thinking that , in principle, from the fact that they have reached some kind of border there, it is nothing. well, in princ

, then other russian politicians were members of the state duma , in particular, he was putin's confidant and his adviser. this is sergey markov in an interview, recently i listened to explain why the war-winning war did not work out. and he and me i was actually quite impressed, as if he said openness, and that is, he says, for example, that the whole war is in the bottom, as if it is even criminally prosecuted, he says well, this is not his for a long time. well, let's admit that the enemy is equal to us, we can't just go, because he responds with missiles, responds with artillery , we will cause losses, he says and then he thinks about a nuclear war, what does he say, we just threatened so that no one is everywhere military well, let's go to ukraine, but after that they explained to us that if we do it, he will continue to list all these stories , that is, he says that our troops will then destroy ukraine. there and a and v- they will throw us out of the un security council and they will start total sanctions against us all over the world. well, that's why we had to retreat. well, but me, that is, that's what he says , and

and that is, it looked strange, but then there was serhii markov, a drunkard, there is a local alcoholic who was once a member of the state dumant to get into it again, you understand, and he explains what he likes, what it we invited her so that they would be a human shield where the president of russia, i.e. so that the ukrainians would not shoot red square well , because it is bad if there are several heads of state you will shoot, i.e. he invited them absolutely deliberately to cover him with their bodies and if they helped him if some drone fell or a missile was covered, i just thought it wouldn’t fall and they can shoot it, well, they can shoot it anywhere but they won’t shoot it, there is logic in this, because any of our allies said so. they can’t do anything in the red squares. if there the president of kazakhstan, this is very dangerous as a result of the events, uh, and there is the prime minister of armenia, well, it is clear to the whole, there is absolutely no logic in this, but the chekista, but the attitude towards the leaders of other countries , you understand once, then it means a parade shield with shield a

and that is, it looked strange, but then there was serhii markov, a drunkard, there is such a local alcoholic who was once a deputy of the state duma to get into it again , you understand, and he means that he explains what he likes, that we invited her so that they would be a human shield where the presidents of russia, that is, so that the ukrainians would not shoot red squares well, because that is it is bad if there are several heads of state you will shoot, i.e. he deliberately invited them to cover him with their bodies. and if they helped him, if some drone or rocket fell, he simply thought that it would not fall. they can shoot them , well, they can shoot them anywhere. they will get stuck, there is logic in this, because any of our allies say this, you can't do anything red squares if the president of kazakhstan is there, say it is very dangerous according to the consequences of the events, uh, and there is the prime minister of armenia well, that's clear, that's it no in this there is absolutely logic or not, but chekist, but you understand the attitude towards the leaders of another country once and then it means a parad

well, i have never met i have seen lindsey graham but sergey markov quite often in my life and i am happy to note that since he left the state dumaon't know, maybe it somehow comforts our ego a little bit when we put senator graham on the wanted list. well, it becomes a little bit like the same ukraine when they put on the wanted list. here, personally, i have been put on the wanted list, and even the condemned decision of the court in ukraine and at the same time banned travel to ukraine does not coincide with one another, because either permit entry arrest, or then. you don’t sentence or arrest in absentia, but you have to choose something, they have everything in one bottle. ukraine should not be used in this sense in relation to graham, in my opinion, everything is obvious and without his this visit, what he said could be assumed in advance that if he had not said before, then at least he acts and thinks exactly in this growth, like many others. but as for the current situation, then, of course, this situation is primarily being discussed by us now in a virtual sphere. although we are well aware that everything is decided not