the holiday came after the dup politician had visited the country on an official trip and had lobbiednvestigation of the claims. sinn fein, the sdlp and alliance have written to the parliamentary commissioner for standards. the north antrim mp has declined to comment. mark devenport reports. if sri lanka is paradise, then a holiday in the maldives must be heavenly. last year, ian paisley was suspended from the commons for failing to declare two family holidays in sri lanka. emp survived a recall petition when fewer than 10% of his constituents demanded by—election. he declared that was the end of the matter. is there anything else in the pipeline that you are worried about coming out that might do for ian paisley? certainly i'm not, there is nothing at all. but now, spotlight has uncovered three undeclared trips to the maldives, crucially the company which owns one of the resorts the family stayed at told the programme the bill had been paid by a government minister. the politician denies that. but an expert on parliamentary law believes ian paisley must explain what happened and may

, it only ta ke likely support of the dup, it only take a handful of them to vote against the governmentput the deal thrills to bring about a no—confidence vote and so borisjohnson if about a no—confidence vote and so boris johnson if it about a no—confidence vote and so borisjohnson if it become spy minister has to work at how he gets him back inside. clearly a man who knows he is on his way out and feels he is no longer bound by the constraints. speaking his mind, he was very strong in saying look, we've got this head room there that is there to deal with a no—deal brexit but if that is gone and there's really no back—up left there and it's going to be taking money away that could be spent on other projects, and he's not one of the most outspoken voices that we have been hearing, but that warning is going to resonate. if you frame it as come of this but i could go to no deal or schools or hospitals than that will resonate with people. hammond has spoken out quite a lot, but done in a subtle way. he does it at select committee hearings and goes under the radar, but he does go offa goes

and the dup. if you don't include other parties how can you be sure it will get through? down the government if they thought we were going for a no deal brexit but they wa nt to going for a no deal brexit but they want to deliver on the democratic outcome of the referendum which is a necessity for our country, we need to recreate that conservative dup family that can get a majority, we tried it with labour, it didn't work. but even with the dup and depending how that by—election in brecon goes, you could be down to a majority of two or three, surely you need to reach out which is what some people wanted to do in 2016, reach out to the other parties but to raise up mate refused.” out to the other parties but to raise up mate refused. i don't think that would work, i think labour has only one objective, to provoke a general election and if corbyn gets into downing street there will never be brexit. that man will never be allowed by his party to deliver brexit, which is why it is so important we hold together as a conservative dup family and deliver brexit. before he became

the campaign spread false information about interactions between dup leader arlene foster and the europeantiator, michel barnier. and finally, the lionesses are through to the quarterfinals of the women's world cup. the victory, however, was not without controversy after england manager phil neville said he was "completely and utterly ashamed" by the behaviour of the cameroon team, who twice looked like they would refuse to play on as england beat them 3—0. we will talk about that. jonathan is back as

veneno mexicano ha confirmado que la migraciÓn en la frontera esta fuera de lo normal y sea de aplica ha dupe dice este inmigrante que ante la declaraciÓn ha decidido a acelerar su paso >>> ho el mandatario mexicano h prometido que el lug romperÁ el silencio ante su relaciÓn con el mandatario norteamericano. >>> mÉxico bloquea cuentas bancarias de presuntos narcotraficantes en la organizaciÓn de caravanas. empresas y sino transferencias desde querÉtaro hace ciudades r fronterizas esta infma que ayud presidentes del Área. el e la r migratoria como mantener a sus ciudadanos en sus paÍses de origen. la reuniÓn conclu inclÓ traspaso de la presidencia de guatemala a salvador por un periodo de seis meses. >>> dÓnde le gustarÍa usted trabajar? un estudio de la firma de recursos humanos dijo que la detecciÓn de los estudiantes universitarios es trabajar para google en esta encuesta trabajaron mÁs de 50,000 de ellos y aunque goolgle, encabez la lista amazon y apple tambiÉn estÁn en ella. >>> despuÉs de 20 aÑos de espera los residentes de san josÉ tendrÁn una estaciÓn de b a bpa. el pasado jueves la j

the government does have a majority, a very small majority, if you include the dup, but that means thateory you only need to conservatives who are not in favour of an ideal brexit to vote against the government for the government to fall. —— two conservatives. as has been proved recently in two elections, the european elections under the peterborough by—election, if the conservative party goes into an election with the brexit issue unresolved, the vote on the right will split and what happens is, the conservative share of the vote falls to about 10% and almost certainly you will get a left—leaning, probably coalition government coming in. so in the mind of conservative party members, what is the most important issue? is it winning a general election, or is it a successful exit from the european union? because many would argue, actually, when you are looking at who you are going to vote for, is it about the communication skills, is it about the leader who can somehow fight off nigel farage? and the brexit party? and at the same time, tackle jeremy corbyn, brexit party? and at the same ti

intelligence operation apparently ran false information about the real ira and interactions between the dupr arlene foster and the eu. ithink party leader arlene foster and the eu. i think what is happening here is, if this was russian intelligence, but certainly it is what we have seen with many russian and new size, they often run operations which put up material which is designed to cause confusion. it is designed not to say this is black and white, but to cause real confusion amongst readers, amongst people who follow the news, because that is seen as stoking lots of political issues. it makes people confused about where politicians stand and undermines individual countries. it undermines people's trust in democracy. and news. and information. and people feel they don't know what is true and what is not. this is said to be and what is not. this is said to be a continuation of that. it is a strategy, we have seen it in many countries. they centred on arlene foster apparently favouring the eu's approach to brexit. we know that is not true. it also says that the den defence secretary, gavi

crisis that i can remember so what i do differently to what we have had before is i would have the dupy negotiating team and have the erg who are the brexit purists, i would and have the erg who are the brexit purists, iwould have and have the erg who are the brexit purists, i would have scottish and welsh conservatives because fundamentally i believe there is a deal to be done. what would be different about the deal you hope to achieve? it would be changing the backstop with some guarantees that have a hard border on the island forked by the obvious reasons. it will be a technology lead solution. you are putting forward, just as borisjohnson you are putting forward, just as boris johnson told you are putting forward, just as borisjohnson told us yesterday something that the european union has said no to. on multiple occasions. what they say is that is up occasions. what they say is that is up to you the uk to come up with a solution but if you come up with a different solution something that can work that we will look at the whole package. it would be a technology lead solution. every

she loses her conservative majority, forcing her to reach out to the dup.he is confident she will unite a nation bruised by political disparities. >> brexit provides us with opportunities. i want to cs coming together. we have a strong union. that is in our interest. >> she presents her deal to the u.k. parliament in january. she failed to convince, suffering the largest defeat. her party members voting against her deals, demanding more stringent agreements, the single markets, and the irish backstop, it was not long until she was back in brussels. vote of no-confidence, mps have rejected two more attempts to get her deal passed. theresa may is stepping down from the conservative party. the eu has made it clear the brexit deal will not be reopened for negotiation. >> the u.s. and mexican officials continue to negotiate into thursday evening in hopes of reaching an agreement on the flow of undocumented migrants into the u.s. to stop trump's threatened tariffs on mexican imports. another round of discussions is expected friday in washington with mike pence sa

commons, keep the whole party on board and that's why you need a unity candidate, you need to get the dupn board, to get out new deal through and that is where jeremy is best placed. some people have said he isn't running an inspired enough campaign and the others are more optimistic about brexit, and they convey that more to the party.|j disagree, i have knownjeremy for 30 years, his business is actually in my queue to truancy and there is an inspiring story of someone who sets up inspiring story of someone who sets up there own business successfully and can deliver jobs, up there own business successfully and can deliverjobs, negotiate well, all these things that jeremy hunt would bring to the table, i think everyone agrees he has performed the best in the hustings and in the tv debates, he deserves to be in the last two to take on borisjohnson. to be in the last two to take on boris johnson. whoever wins this, bringing the party back together will be a massive challenge, do you think it can be done with brexit still hanging over us?|j think it can be done with brexit still hanging over

all the parties other than the dup and conservatives at a party seem to have signed up to it, but isy one conservative mp who cosigned this as well, which is all of her neck to supporting michael goes, so it's quite interesting as faras goes, so it's quite interesting as far as the party dynamic as he signed up to this as well. what is slightly worrying about it is with brexit, on both sides, i think it has become a trust issue for everybody. all of the mp5, they are all clever and oliver is certainly clever as far as all clever and oliver is certainly cleveras faras i'm all clever and oliver is certainly clever as far as i'm concerned they knew very well they can't legislate as much is a light, there is nothing they can do to unilaterally take it i'io they can do to unilaterally take it no deal off the top bat —— table and literally nothing. the one thing they can do unilaterally that we as a country can do is revoke article 50, and it will be everyone would think everyone who's been following the process and president, will be thinking back exactly what the mp5 actually wanted to d

negotiating team, as i mentioned, that has on it to people from different parts of the conservative, dupssels we can deliver through parliament. brexit was not of course the only subject to come up. climate change was also discussed by both candidates. borisjohnson was asked about it by a party member and this was his view. the uk has a fantastic record as an agenda setter on reducing c02, we should stick up for it, particularly of course with our american friends because they sometimes, they can need gingering up when it comes to this issue. i do think we face a very real threat. from a helicopter? whose chopper is that? i have got a terrible feeling that is mine. a deeply embarrassing moment, folks, just as i'm talking about climate change. unfortunate timing for borisjohnson but actually it turned out that was the helicopter ofjeremy hunt. they both have helicopters. borisjohnson made the point that perhaps they should consider sharing a helicopter in the interests of climate change. or they could consider not having a helicopter at all. thank you very much. the headlines on bbc news.

forcing her to reach out to northern ireland's dup. britain's leader is confidential united nation bruised by political disparities rex it provides us with opportunities i want to see is coming together. the four nations across the united kingdom we have a very strong union that is in our interest after two years of journeying back and forth between london and brussels. may present said deal negotiated with the u. leaders to the u. k. parliament in january. but she fails to convince suffering the largest defeat in government history another who's having the news have it with a hundred and eighteen of her own party members voting against her deal. including a string of all right let's hear him he's demanding more stringent agreements on the customs union the single markets and the irish bank still. it wasn't long until may was back in brussels. and despite trying thing in the votes of no confidence mps have rejected three more attempts to get her deal passed. having failed to convince parliament the her path was the right way outs of th

i would have the dup in my negotiating team, i would have the erg, who are the brexit purists, i wouldbecause fundamentally i believe there is a deal to be done. what would be different about the deal you hope to achieve? changing the backstop, but with some guarantee that we're not going to have a hard border on the island of ireland, for completely obvious reasons. that approach is not too different to what boris wants. i think it will be a technology—led solution. listening to you talking about your brexit plans is actually very similar to talking to borisjohnson about his brexit plans — high on ambition, low on concrete detail. well, no, i've been very clear about the concrete detail, and the judgement is who is the person we trust as prime minister to go to brussels and bring back that deal. what is the evidence that you could get this done? you've got to be absolutely clear about what you want and it's different to what theresa may was negotiating. the answer to your question that boris and i am to change the deal and who do we trust as per minister to go to brussels and bring ba

so what i'd do differently to what we've had before is i would have the dup in my negotiating team, i'dxit purists, i'd have scottish and welsh conservatives, because fundamentally i believe there is a deal to be done. what would be different about the deal you hope to achieve? well, it would be changing the backstop, but with some guarantees that we're not going to have a hard border on the island of ireland, for completely obvious reasons. that approach is not too different to what boris wants. i think it'll be a technology—led solution. listening to you talking about your brexit plans is actually very similar to talking to borisjohnson about his brexit plans — high on ambition, low on concrete detail. well, no, i've been very clear about the concrete detail. we've just been talking about the fa ct we've just been talking about the fact that it wouldn't include... you are fact that it wouldn't include... you a re clear fact that it wouldn't include... you are clear about what you would like to do, but it is a wish. that is the starting point for any deal. you have to be clear about wh

so what i'd do differently to what we've had before is i would have the dup in my negotiating team, iave the erg, who are the brexit purists, i would have scottish and welsh conservatives, because fundamentally i believe there is a deal to be done. what would be different about the deal you hope to achieve? well, it would be changing the backstop, but with some guarantee that we're not going to have a hard border on the island of ireland, for completely obvious reasons. that approach is not too different to what boris wants. i think it'll be a technology—led solution. what is the evidence you can get this done? that is the starting point of a deal. you have to be clear about what you want that is different to what theresa may is negotiating, but the answer to your question is that both boris and i wa nt to question is that both boris and i want to change that deal, and the judgement is who is the person you trust as prime minister to go to brussels and bring back that deal. it's about the personality of our prime minister. if you choose someone where there's no trust, there's going to

still leader ofa becomes leader, he is still leader of a minority government and has to rely on the duphange, that may be sure and may not be true, but unless there is a general election, the parliamentary arithmetic set stays where it is, and that places him in a very difficult position. there are other important stories around, and i know that both of you have focused on what the independent is leading with tomorrow. dawn, this is an exclusive about the care quality commission have been looking at, to do with care homes and abuse. yes, since 2014, so, to 2018, the number of complaints to the care quality commission about care homes has doubled. so compared to 2014, the numberand doubled. so compared to 2014, the number and she went up by around about 80%. and that means that in the past four years, there have been a culture of a million complaints. so more and more people are complaining about the quality of ca re complaining about the quality of care that is being delivered in care homes. there is talk of unfurnished rumours about standish —— unfurnished rooms and standards of care.

i would have the dup in my negotiating team, i would have the erg, who are the brexit purists, i would conservatives, because fundamentally i believe there is a deal to be done. what would be different about the deal you hope to achieve? changing the backstop, but with some guarantee that we're not going to have a hard border on the island of ireland, for completely obvious reasons. that approach is not too different to what boris wants. i think it will be a technology—led solution. you are putting forward, just as borisjohnson told us yesterday, something that the european union has said no to on multiple occasions. i've been very clear about the concrete detail we have been talking about, that's. .. was concrete detail we have been talking about, that's... was the evidence that you could get this done? that isa that you could get this done? that is a starting point, you have to be absolutely clear about what you want and that's different to what theresa may was negotiating but the answer to your question is that both boris andi to your question is that both boris and i want to change

the dup, i suspect, would go along with the possibility of a no deal if that was the only option left look at the opinion polls, the conservative party... you can be frightened of the conservative party in the elections. you cannot tell me how you would get no deal through parliament without triggering a general election. the opinion polls show if borisjohnson is the leader of the conservative party we would then go back into the lead the first time in many months and then we could save the british electorate. a heck of risk, theresa may was in the lead before the 2017 general election. it is a risk but there is no other alternative. we could say to the british people, look, the only option on the table because the europeans refuse to negotiate is no deal. will you back us negotiate is no deal. will you back us and give us another mandate on that basis? and i think on that basis, listening to my local party members, and public meetings in shrewsbury, i say to people, would you be willing to accept a no deal, the vast majority of people out there, outside of the watford gap, they are f

biggest constitutional crisis i can remember, so what i would do differently is i i would have the dupotiating team, i would have the erg the brexit purist, scottish and welsh conservatives, because fundamentally, i believe there is a deal to be done. what would be different about the deal you hope to achieve? it would be changing the backstop but with some guarantees that we are not going to have a hard border on the island of ireland for obvious reasons, that approach is not too different to what boris want, it will be a technology led solution. you are putting forward as borisjohnson told us something that the european union has said no to, on multiple occasions. what they say is it up to the uk to come up with a solution, but if you come up with a different solution, something that can work, then we will look at the package. what would it be? a technology led solution, everyone thinks within the next decade we aren't going to have big border checks when it o comes to goods because they will be don online. you won't have a deal unless there is a backstop, unless there is a credible

i would have the dup in my negotiating team, i would have the erg, the brexit purists because fundamentallyhink there is a deal to be done. what would be different about the deal you would hope to achieve? changing the backstabber with guarantees we will not have a hard border on the island of ireland for obvious reasons. that is not too far from what boris johnson wants. you are putting forward something the european union has said no to on multiple occasions? it will be a technology led solution. i think everyone thinks within the next decade, we aren't going to have big border checks when it comes to goods because we will do these things online just as the rest of our lives has transformed. you won't have a deal unless there is a backstop, u nless deal unless there is a backstop, unless there is a credible idea ready immediately and you are saying it is not ready immediately, you are saying within a decade. it is ready. now? yes it is. the eu don't want to accept this solution because the eu think we will have to stay in this customs union and stick to their tariffs. they said they wante

it is a hung parliament, even with the dup, the conservative party has a majority 110w conservative partyas a majority now of five. so, you know, you can do the maths and it doesn't take many people to go the other way. whoever the prime minister is, they could lose their majority. there is still a lively possibility that people could come back again to try and stop a no deal brexit. and how credible is it to leave the european union by october 31, yesterday we were told it is not possible. it is if you have a different plan. matt hancock has put forward a detailed plan, with a timetable attached, saying that we would have an in principle vote on the deal, which is different from, excuse me, the government's existing deal. we hope to have that before the summer recess to get negotiations going early enough that you would be able to get it through before october 31. there is a council of the eu between 110w there is a council of the eu between now and then, so they would be a chance to take that decision. damian green, thank you very much. todayis damian green, thank you very much. today i

the conservative party and our friends in all wings of the conservative party and ourfriends in the duphas to be from two theresa may steel. we can't put this forward on this we absolutely know it can get through the british parliament. what would be different about the deal you hope to achieve? changing the backstop, but with some guarantee that we're not going to have a hard border on the island of ireland, for completely obvious reasons. that approach is not too different to what boris wants. i think it will be a technology—led solution. we had a lot of discussion about how. we need to have more discussion about who. who is the person we need to trust to send to russell's on behalf of the british people and come back with the deal? that has to be someone they trust and are prepared to talk to because you don't do a deal with someone you don't do a deal with someone you don't trust. it has to be someone thatis don't trust. it has to be someone that is not going to blink, who is prepared to walk away if we don't get what we need and i'm prepared to do absolutely that. i don't want us t

thing i would do would be to put together a brexit negotiating team that would include for example, the duperg the brexit purists, one nation interpret paige tories, 18 that would be able to deliver through parliament, the first rule of negotiations. when asked about a general election, he explained why they would not happen before brexit. we are in a very serious situation. get things wrong and there will be i'io get things wrong and there will be no conservative government, maybe even 110 no conservative government, maybe even no conservative party. get things right and we can deliver brexit, unite the party and send jeremy corbyn packing, i will never sign one before we have left the european union. i will not do it. the lesson of peterborough is that that would kill us. he was asked to defend his record as health secretary and how that qualifies them to the top job. secretary and how that qualifies them to the topjob. as prime minister, you have to take very difficult decisions and as health secretary you have to take life—and—death decisions in you saw that videojust now, some of the p

it would for the dup. at five to seven yea rs europe is looking at five to seven years length of backstop, and the idea is so upsetting to brexiteers of being stuck in that for ever. the problem for both of the candidates is that someone like steve baker and a22 is that someone like steve baker and a 22 didn't, nigel farage who i spent time with before the european election, his big thing was how can i trust boris given how he voted previously. he could try and do a deal ahead of the election, certainly. beating jeremy corbyn is what tony blair believes to boris johnson could do. even with the brexit party rampant? well, that was before that happened. so, if it comes down to some change on the backstop, and that is it, you could, at least theoretically, argue that maybe europe would say, if that's it... then let us just do it. maybe europe would say, if that's it... then let usjust do it. if they are meaningfully seeing no deal, that is when they will put a no deal minister into cabinet, you could be looki

the denver public schools who real concerns for their kids and the world in they wii they will grow dupwe're not haven't been addressing it for the last ten years, which is what "the land of the flickering lights" is about i believe it's because the tyranny of the freedom caucus in the last decade and the way mitch mcconnell has used that to stop progress on anything he can from healthcare to guns to climate change. >> woodruff: and what i want to ask you about is, right now, about the democratic field because what you have is joe ofden has surged into the lead. we know a lohat is name identification. >> right. >> woodruff: b unseating an incumbent president, taking the presidency away from another party usually is about the future, who represents the future. >> i agree. >> woodruff: does joe biden represent the future? >> no, i don think so. i think it's time for a new generation of leadership, and i'm not surprised he's leading the polls because he has more name recognition, certainly than i do. but are going to have a prgorous competition of ideas in this democratiary, and i think we

whatever you think of robert mueller and the work he's dup here, is that a practical impact of this reportthe message, well, he did it, he got away with it. >> you know what, that's a danger. you do think we may need to look at further legislation to make sure that it is clear an unquestionable that that is an illegal activity. >> blocking that legislation. >> seems to me that would make common sense, anyone would know. you talk to any reasonable attorney almost, they will tell you it's a violation of law, what the president has done and continues to do. so for the sake of making sure that in the future and for future presidents, maybe we need to make sure it's explicitly put into law. so i think a number of my colleagues are looking at drafting legislation, which seems ridiculous if you have to do that. given who we have as the president, you've got to prepare now for who could be president, who could be con men. >> are you saying the president is willing to break the law on this based on his public comments? >> the president has broken the law, i believe. we've just got to bring all the

and i think that this not being asked -- now there were candidates who brought it dup -- >> brought it up on their own, that's true. >> saying this is the number one issue and geopolitical concern. that not being asked i think sends a message it's been trivialized, it's been normalized and we're numb to it. >> now we know that mueller is testifying on july 17th. katie, are you planning how you're going to cover it that day? >> yeah, we're setting up tents outside. i mean -- >> not quite, huh? >> two weeks away, but i think it will dominate the discussions up until then. i think there are serious open questions about what to expect from the special counsel. whether or not he'll adhere to what he already said, you won't get more out of me if i'm called to testify. >> right. >> so i think it will be very interesting to get a sense of whether or not he is ready to sort of speak about the process and how it played out. you get hints of his dissatisfaction with how the attorney general took parts of the report and displayed it a month before it was released. so those are the things that we'r

>>the dup on project floors in the school are scheduled to be repaired this summer parents though say that will put the school at the end of the repair listen. they say that the problems are so bad there. the change needs to happen now in san francisco tailored to sackey kron 4 news. >>morning news debris still making a mess we're a major mudslide hit the bay area months ago the reason why it's taking so long to clean up. anford student who was sexually assaulted by brock turner says she wants to take control. her story we'll te ♪ lowe's knows, dad knows best. and like he always says, "if it's worth doing, it's worth doing right." so, we do it right with the most dewalt power tools and accessories for dad. and more deals on the stuff he wants this father's day. because dad doesn't just know best, he does best. man, that's a cool looking hot tub. we should check on the baby. he's so sweet. maybe too sweet? internet's down. go! your home is only as smart as your internet. get reliable at&t fiber and get speeds up to 300 megabits per second and directv. bundle for 75 dollars a month for

that i can remember, so what i would do differently to what we have had before as i would have the dupnegotiating team, the er g for the brexit purists, i would have scottish and welsh conservatives, because fundamentally i believe there is a deal to be done. what would be different about the deal you hope to achieve? it would be changing the backstop but with some guarantees of no hard porter on the island of ireland for a completely obvious reasons. that approach is not too different from what boris wa nts. not too different from what boris wants. it would be a technology led solution. you are putting forward something that the european union has said no to on multiple occasions. what they see as it is up to the uk to come up with a solution but of course if you come up with a different solution, something that can work, then we will look at that. but what would it be? it would be a technology led solution and i think eve ryo ne technology led solution and i think everyone thinks in the next decade we can do all these things online just as the rest of her life is transformed. you won

we would need enough to overcome the majority, of the conservative party and dup. i can say you look on the order paper, already this motion is being supported by conservative members of parliament. and that is very significant, but we also know of christ we had people like the chancellor, saying that a no—deal brexit is not in the interest of the country. we had had teresa make outgoing prime minister saying that is in no—deal brexit let out a consent of parliament, so within this, we know... that you say that but still unless you can create one, there isn't yet a parliamentary mechanism, parliament may want a no—deal brexit but they yet do not have a mechanism to stop a no—deal brexit. i know that's what you're trying to do but actually the new prime minister whoever they may be, could just run down the clock and allow to follow the eu on october 31. but that's the reason for having motion tomorrow and then hiding the order paper controlled by parliament onjune order paper controlled by parliament on june 25 because order paper controlled by parliament onjune 25

it's going to have to be delivered on our benches with our dup allies. to carry this with a majority of 50 or 100, it will be ten or 15, that magnitude. to get permission to sit around the table with european union partners is going to mean getting some credibility with the irish government so the priority is sitting down with the taoiseach and the leader of the opposition party in ireland and getting them to understand that we mean what we say when we signed up to the belfast agreement, we mean to deliver a border in northern ireland that is infrastructure free so that the people of the north and the republic can people of the north and the republic ca n cross people of the north and the republic can cross the border freely as they do today and as i saw for myself last year. it's only if they buy that and they believe we are straight and credible on that that they will be prepared to sit around a table with our eu partners and discuss these issues. i think we've got to put a real effort into getting stormont back up and running because i think that will

i would have the dup in my negotiating team, i would have the erg, the brexit purists, i'd have scottishe different about the deal you hope to achieve? changing the backstop, but with some guarantees that we are not going to have a hard border on the island of ireland for completely obvious reasons. that approach is not too different to what boris wants. i think it will be a technology—led solution. you are putting forward, just as boris johnson told us yesterday, something that the european union has said no to on multiple occasions. it will be a technology—led solution. i think everyone thinks that within the next decade, we are not going to have big border checks when it comes to goods because we are going to do all these things online, just like the rest of our lives has transformed. you won't have a deal unless there was a backstop, unless there is a credible idea ready immediately, and you are not saying it is ready immediately, you are talking about within a decade. i think it is ready, but of course... now? yes, i do. but the eu have not wanted to accept this kind of solution bec

we have a small working majority with the help of the dup.w many votes he got from conservative mps. sorry to interrupt. you think he has the right person for the job and you are seeing there will be other candidates wherever they became leader of the party other people will not like them but borisjohnson after the first round of voting is so after the first round of voting is so far out after the first round of voting is so farout in after the first round of voting is so far out in the late summer seeing it is going... it kind of puts in a difficult position because it makes those who do not want him to be leader look at what is going on and think perhaps we should band together and form some sort of a stop boris coalition. what do you think about that? since boris got 114 votes in the first round, 105 would mean you could not finish worse than second, so you couldn't not be in the run—off. if you look at the candidates who unfortunately fell out of the competition, they are votes predominantly will go to borisjohnson because are votes predo

it is important that the dup are on board as confidence and supply partners, but it's also very importanttable, and michael is going to do that, given his fundamental understanding of the northern ireland political situation. so the german chancellor angela merkel has made it very clear tojeremy ina angela merkel has made it very clear to jeremy in a conversation that they had a couple of weeks ago that they had a couple of weeks ago that they are open to other suggestions. she made it very clear that it is out she made it very clear that it is our border with ireland, not the german or french border, it is our border with ireland and the backstop is there if you haven't found the long term solution. and the important thing here is to continue focusing on finding the long—term solution and no one is going to keep that open border that i desperately want. i was born in northern ireland, we need to have that open border. you will only get that if the eu trust you to be a good neighbour. that is why we need to have a leader that is already trusted on the international stage. they said we wil

lock so that we reassure northern ireland and had the dup on site.. on having a sense assembly and having michel barnier to come over to the stop you would be surprised if he had a new prime minister, with authority and a fresh mandate on how to suck the sectoral agreement out, to be sure parliament and —— how to sort this agreement out... we are talking about her come second in this part. why should it be michael gove and notjeremy hunt? with that to be more of a choice for conservative party member is? not at all. i think it is a danger that you effectively end up re—fighting the referendum result. for me we had tried every major in theresa may and who said she would respect the result. but now we have someone who generally leaves in it and campaigned —— genuinely believes in it and campaigned to leave. but borisjohnson, her second get to it and campaigned to leave. but boris johnson, her second get to the final, he is more of a figurehead type of prime minister and, by the omission of his own team, they would wa nt omission of his own team, they w

depart for number 10 downing street where they will meet with the prime minister and the head of the duphis for the prime minister? she leaves as conservative party leader on friday which opens up the leadership race. erik: it must be awful. it is the capping of an awful prime minister ship that has decelerated into more awkwardness. it must be strange to host. ,aybe for somebody like her having been in politics for her life, it is important to host the american president, whoever he is. if i was hurt, i would have left before he came. tom: the images of protests in london. our first word news, here is viviana hurtado. viviana: china issuing a travel warning for the u.s., saying u.s. law enforcement have interrogated and harassed chinese visitors. president trump restricted student visas at elite universities, several students and and structures saying they find the environment and friendly dutch unfriendly. last week, a south korean reported north korea executed kim jong joel for failing to reach a deal with the u.s. he led the negotiations. no official response to the cnn report. his p

get a deal, we wouldn't have the nine labour mp5 that were with the government, we wouldn't have the dupthe front runners, borisjohnson of the front runners, borisjohnson of the foreign office. this morning, he received the backing of the former tory leader iain duncan smith who joins me now. the big question is why? i have looked at all the candidates, all of the key ones that i think will likely get close to the final round, and i came to the conclusion that this is not like a normal leadership election, you don‘t have time to develop somebody who has got no... we have to go with somebody who the public already knows. i think that is critical because they are going to be prime minister day one, they need to hit the ground running, and the public has got to know who they are and wa nt to has got to know who they are and want to know more about him. that is the first thing. the second thing is who is absolutely clear that the mandate now is that we have to leave by the 31st of october? and how do you go about doing that? in my conversations were quite simple, you don‘t go with the withdr

new prime minister with authority is capable of uniting the party and reaching an agreement with the dupeks to get it over the line. you talk about unifying the party, michael gove was criticised yesterday for launching an attack on borisjohnson, some yesterday for launching an attack on boris johnson, some people yesterday for launching an attack on borisjohnson, some people said he was going too far, that will not bring the party together?” was going too far, that will not bring the party together? i was in the room, i don't think this was really an attack, this is a contest and you are framing the choice for people and it is a choice between different candidates, each with rival ideas. what he was really saying yesterday which was picked up quite a lot, he was pointing out when he was asked whether he should withdraw from the contest, he said he was committed and he would fight on and he pointed out borisjohnson had withdrawn last time the contest took place. there was nothing unreasonable about what he said, but he wasjust reacting unreasonable about what he said, but he was just rea