the bottom two pillars of the durham triangle are the fbi, john durham's indictment of the fbi and kearnych is literally an indictment of the fbi and now criminal conviction for lying to a federal court to perpetuate a fraud and get a pfizer warrant falsely. the last leg of the durum triangle comes in the form of his recent advisement of danchenko. who is danchenko and why does it matter, he is steeles main source introducing this by fiona hill who steel relied on to write his dossier in which he said he, steel, or received information from danchenko and we now know danchenko is a liar and because of the durum investigation danchenko provided no credible information to christer seo, so he has now been destroyed and these merchants of minnesota finally coming to light thanks to john durham's work and he has a long way to go. i'm glad he's getting the indictment-- excuse me, the information that rod rosenstein intentionally withheld from german nunez and our investigation and the russian probe. maria: on the indictment, this is the fbi attorney, doesn't end there or will we see a road to ot

there is no indication sullivan is a target in the durham probe. fox news reached out to his office for comment, and we have yet to hear back. durham began his probe into the origins of the russia investigation two and a half years ago but in the past two and a half months, the pace has picked up. last week durham charged igor danchenko a russian national with lying to the fbi. durham claims danchenko was a source for british spy christopher steele and his infamous dossier. >> not everything that's a political dirty trick or in the nature of abuse of power is necessarily a violation of the federal law, so it looks like what durham is honed in on here is that the trump-russia collusion narrative was a concoction of the clinton campaign. >> the indictment mentions danchenko's communications with pr executive 1. that executive is long-time clint adviser charles duck dollan. dollan has not been charged with a crime but is a witness in the danchenko case and his attorney tells fox news no comment. durham says dollan was in contact with danchenko who was

the third indictment in john durham's probe.ko confessed to the fbi back in january of 2017 as you know. we reported this many times on this program. that the dossier, which was paid for by hillary clinton's campaign, was bogus. it was used by the fbi to justify spying on her political opponent, donald trump and his campaign during the 2016 he election and beyond. we first reported this when senator lindsey graham requested then dni john ratcliffe to declassify the related documents in july of 2020. >> and we have learned from the memo that we declassified that the russian subsource who was american based, not russian based, told christopher steele here's what i've got. it's rumor, innuendo, it's not reliable and what did christopher steele do with that? he turned spite a tom clan sigh -- turned it into a tom clan dhs cy novel. what does the memo show. in january 2017 when they found the russian subsource who was in the united states, he disavoid the doseway as being reliable, the fbi knew it, did a 40 page memo but the fbi cont

durham? >> i agree with you. i think i'm certainly concerned when i read these indictments, both mr. sussman's and mr. danchenko's. his indictment is 39 pages long. if you go through those 39 pages and pull out the facts that are relevant to the statements he's alleged t.o. made to the fbi, that's a much smaller subset. whether intentionally or not, when you look at the balance of those pages, they have several dog whistles to these kind of pro-trump conspiracy theories. statements like the fbi's investigation of the trump campaign relied on certain things. well, there was never an fbi investigation of the trump campaign unless you listen to some kind of far extreme right commentators or folks in congress who assert that there was, but that's nonsense. the indictment makes a point to note that the fbi was unable to corroborate steele's reporting. at the same time it neglects to mention that we weren't able to disprove it either. as you look through there, these subtle one-sided portrayals of the facts that lay do

all of this raises the question, evan, what is durham trying to show with these indictments? in the two recent indictments durham has brought is he is sketching out this idea of a broader conspiracy that the former president, president trump, as he complained for years, was essentially the victim of a smear carried out by everyone from clinton campaign operatives, people in democratic party, this law firm that works for democrats, trying to get the fbi to investigate donald trump and his campaign and leaking that information to the media. now, this is the world of opposition research. that is the way it works here in washington. and very often this is the way stories get planted. it is not necessarily illegal. in this case, durham says that there were crimes committed and so now he has brought charges against the former clinton campaign lawyer who worked for perkins to try to prove some of these points. >> durham is not done. where is he going with this? >> we don't know whether he has additional charges. he certainly has more subpoenas against additional folks. one thing we

clinton by john durham. last i checked, in terms of congressional testimony the dossier people refused to tell investigators what they told the candidate or the campaign directly. i think she should be asked questions. there is other information out there that there was intelligence that the clinton people and the obama people through the fbi who were also anti-trump made all this up because of the email scandal, she was nervous about the criminal liability and it was a political problem for her as well so what do you do? make up fake allegations against your political opponents which may be fair however unethical in a campaign but when you are using the fbi to spy on your political opponents, obama and clinton you get into crimes and when you are lying to the fbi that is what durham is looking at. i'm glad durham did something but the fbi knew four years ago this was a lie, mueller knew it was a lie. people like adam schiff, - todd: if bob mueller had all the money and resources in the world to figure out,

that was the last indictment from john durham last month. today's indictment, against this primary source and researcher for christopher steele's intelligence report. this is about false statements, he allegedly made, to those fbi agents, working under peter strzok. who were trying to track down the reporting in 2016 2017. the guy who is charged today is named gordon cheng co-, he appeared in federal court in virginia today, he was charged with five counts of making false statements to the fbi, about his own sources for certain things, that made it into steele's reporting. and whether he did lie to the fbi, in those interviews, will not be a matter for the courts. but it also is worth noting that this new indictment just like the last, one has been comparatively little time talking about the alleged false statements, and a lot of time talking about people he came in contact, with or talked to, who are horror of horrors, democrats, people who may have even supported hillary clinton's presidential campaign in 2016. the unmistakable impression

on charges stemming from durham's probe.indictment, sandra, danchenko is charged with five counts of false statements to the f.b.i. those statements pertain to so-called company reports which are sources of information he provided to steele. party of the indictment reads all of danchenko's lies were material to the f.b.i. because among other reasons the f.b.i.'s investigation of the trump campaign relied in large part on the company reports to obtain fisa warrants and as we know that pertains to the surveillance warrant issued against former trump aide carter page. danchenko is the third person charged in the durham 2 1/2-year investigation. the two previous individuals were kevin klinessmith who -- kevin clinesmith. michael sussman's case is ongoing. we expect danchenko to be here in the next hour or so. the big question now is arising again. will any big fish so to speak -- any names that might be household names going to be charged in this 2 1/2-year probe which attorney general merrick garland has allowed to continue --

. >> jesse: thanks to an indictment from john durham, we know the truth.re was no leaked phone call from igor danchenko. he was not speaking to the head of the russian chamber of commerce about donald trump about anything at all. instead, according to today's indictment, the source of much of demchenko's information was a democratic party operative. and a former hillary clintonou advisor. we can identify that clinton advisor tonight. his name is charles dolan. in other words, hillary clinton's team was not just funding the steele dossier, they were effectively writing it, too. dolan, by the way, has extensive connections to russia, closer than anybody on donald trump'sdo team had from 2006 to 2014. for example, dolan did p.r. work on behalf of the russian government and a russian energy company.4. according to durham's indictment, danchenko told dolan he was working on "a project against trump." dolan responded by saying he just received dirt on paul manafort, who was donald trump's campaign manager at the time from "a g.o.p. friend." it was all a lie. acc

breaking tonight a bombshell new development in the durham probe.mary sources, in this case a russian analyst was indicted. what this could mean for hillary clinton. comey and other high level actors that pushed the russian collusion hoax for 5 years. durham may have figured this out. who should be worried tonight? we begin tonight with democrats

this is the durham bombshell.ruption, a democrat operative active in moscow was the source for danchenko who was a source for steele to go after trump and his campaign. what do you say to that? >> this guy danchenko is russian born. he lived in the united states a long time. i don't know a heck of a lot about him. as much as anybody knows based on the indictment. it was interesting he wasn't in russia at the time information was fed to him ultimately to steele. we have a lot of questions to be asked and answered. this is an important piece of the puzzle and durham is going n m idind heasasssionediodiy. anet jen tnlintonli by teyolr.iriyndi iz abelh:ohha d ashe has his bef besef. th d dtpeveepepd,loyed,ye actiac iosco moscoos he h weeorr airchfr o o n oio nna oemoc dt poli tica oron atior adiccng ngtotourmurha i he ked fordoror bl clto a a stata c was an an ais t hil gn. meut hutasascte is workedrked witedit tan rl, miny of foreign affairs. he was at the moscow hotel where the conference was being held that he was

but the indictment gives us another insight into what durham knows. and what he has revealed in this indictment is new. it shows the different layers of connection with the clinton campaign, particularly the figure who is referred to as only as p.r. executive 1. this is described as someone who was an adviser to hillary clinton on her campaign, was involved in her campaign, involved in the democratic party. but he is actually in moscow making connections with some of these figures. at one point he even gives one of these figures the autobiography of hillary clinton with -- written in it is to a true democrat. or something of that sort. so just as bizarre on a number of levels. but it adds to what is created -- what is becoming a mosaic. he would learned earlier, if you recall, that president obama was briefed by -- for the national security establishment flagging, that hillary clinton was thinking about creating an allegation that trump was in collusion with russia. this led to an actual briefing of the president. it was after that that the steele dos

we have to wait for durham to see.have you on, we'll have you on back soon. up next, former dhs official mike howell. border crisis. texas says it arrested thousands of illegal aliens in their border crack down. florida governor ron desantis is moving to stop funding to companies that aided biden's catch and release. be here back in two. we got this. we got this. we got this. we got this. yay! we got this. we got this! life is for living. we got this! let's partner for all of it. edward jones with amerisave's consistently low mortgage rates, your little girl can go wherever her dreams take her, like toward a career in the ethics of rhythm and movement. anyway, good luck with that, because amerisave can only help with the part of the dream you can buy -- with money. ♪ ♪ with the part of the dream you can buy -- when the chapstick goes on. it's on. get yours on at chapstick.com ♪ ♪ ♪ hey google. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ this is elodia. she's a recording artist. 1 of 10 million people that comcast has connected to affordable internet

i think what durham is saying the f.b.i.e allegations but that doesn't mean they were criminally in on it. >> bill: what about adam schiff going on tv 220 times and the media being a player in all this and the way it offset that administration. jeff sessions recuses himself and we go into the whole mueller matter. >> you know what that sounds like, bill? infuriating but not criminal. >> bill: fair enough. andy mccarthy. we'll see whether or not durham is done in the end. see whether it goes on or whether it stops in its tracks. mccarthy smart man there, right? you have to think about adam schiff and so many others. the "washington post" wrote about the media having a recongress after this. these news outlets face a journalistic challenge. backing up the claims. if the effort does not produce enough evidence there is only one option, retract the stories allowing one version of events to sit awkwardly alongside another and leaving it for the reader to decide won't cut it. >> dana: that's true. i sat next to andy mccarthy durin

john durham had a slightly different approach.he russia probe and claimed it was okay to investigate trump and his campaign in 2016. john durham took a really unprecedented step releasing a public statement saying he didn't agree. he blasted the ig. it was very unorthodox to do and it gave us a clue of where he thinks he's going with this. and a lot of people, pam, said that he may have come to some conclusions early before he even doing the investigation. >> right. because at that -- when he released that statement, that was very early in the investigation where presumably he didn't know -- he didn't have all of the facts. >> it was two years ago. >> yeah, it was two years ago. so that certainly raised questions. i remember as a justice reporter in my past thinking that was stunning that a prosecutor would release a statement like that so early. what is durham trying to show with these indictments? >> it seems like he's telling a story of what looks like some sort of democratic or democratic backed conspiracy to sort of pin trump

what kind of coverage will we see in the durham indictment and the fbi going forward?l at all. not in any way optimistic that the legacy corporate liberal press is going to spend much time dwelling on this subject. there have been a couple media reporters, even at "the washington post," eric women pell, who spent a bunch of time litigating all the failures by the press when it came to the steele dossier. the truth, only small number of journalists taken the issue seriously. they should. hillary clinton used her access and power within the federal government in order to weaponize it fence american citizens who did not have power. donald trump as rich as he was did not have access to the levers of government. the government was used against him, used to paralyze his administration all on the basis of lies. what we find out from the latest durham indictment, chuck dolan, an operative from clinton world was feeding information to igor danchenko who was putting it right into this disgusting dossier full of lies shared with the media and of course the fbi and that is how we

durham was shar, 16 and nine months. durham was sharp. always — 16 and nine months. loving, into - 16 and nine months. durham was sharp, always loving, into his- sharp, always loving, into his music, — sharp, always loving, into his music, out— sharp, always loving, into his music, out with lad, very love! _ music, out with lad, very love! i! _ music, out with lad, very lo al. " , . , music, out with lad, very lo al., ., ,., ., music, out with lad, very loal. ., , loyal. 11 years on now, they still remember _ loyal. 11 years on now, they still remember exactly - loyal. 11 years on now, they| still remember exactly what happened on the day he got shot, the way i felt.- happened on the day he got shot, the way i felt. when we first stepped _ shot, the way i felt. when we first stepped foot _ shot, the way i felt. when we first stepped foot in - first stepped foot in afghanistan, it was very similar_ afghanistan, it was very similar to a rack in many senses _ similar to a rack in many senses. the heat wasjust unbearable. you are looking around _ unbearable. you are look

since then, sullivan has been referred to as the foreign policy advisor to special counsel john durham'sndictment of clinton campaign a lawyer, michael sussmann. sussmann is charged with lying to the fbi about the trump organization and russia. there is no indication sullivan played any role beyond receiving information from the clinton campaign lawyer or that he's the target of the durham probe but it is the first direct link we're seeing between the investigation into the origins of the russia probe and the biden white house. and as this new connection comes to light, so have sullivan's deep family ties to the biden administration including his wife who served as counsel to attorney general merrick garland. now, garland has oversight of durham's probe into the origins of the fbi investigation into whether trump's 2016 campaign colluded with russia. now, the founder of the american accountability foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to bringing transparency to government, calls that relationship troubling. the organization plans to recommend to congress that they investigate garland's ties

there's no indication that sullivan is a target of the durham probe. however we're told that he did receive some information from that unnamed campaign lawyer. tomorrow igor denchenko will be in cord. his diamond mentioned pr executive one. we know that is a clinton confidant named chuck dolan. he's not be charged with a crime but his attorney tells fox news dolan has no comment. durham said he was in contact with steele to produce damaging information about donald trump. a lot of names there, a lot of information. i want to point out, i reached out to the white house, the national security adviser, people for jake sullivan to let him know about the report. i have not heard back. >> martha: thanks, david spunt reporting. let's bring in casey mcfarland from the trump security department. author and former federal prosecutor, andy mccarthy, author of "ball of collusion." so it's very interesting. you hear adam schiff there suggest that, you know, if somebody lied, we should check that out and should be investigated. the problem is that the circle that we

this is what they said in the durham indictment.nchenko's work could affect likelihood that a hostile foreign intelligence service, meaning russia would attempt to influence the election and, basically plow disinformation into the hillary campaign and into the fbi. so adam schiff is not aware that russia is capable of doing things like that to that degree. what do you say? >> well, the russians have been and will always be a problem. they will always meddle in our affairs and hopefully we do the same. the bottom line, this indictment came out last week for danchenko, really sets up a horrific scenario that is much worse than the russian state proper. it is democratic operatives for hillary feeding false stories, knowingly to a russian intel agent who gives it to a fired informant for the fbi and the fbi runs with it. like there is no legitimate good purpose behind anybody in that chain of events that led to two years worth of debilitating investigations. >> and putin is dealing with this, is laughing at this like a cat's paw, right?

that the durham criminal probe would clean out what happened.bi attorney kevin clinesmith saying things like, viva resistance. we have to get rid of the crazies. peter strzok's bias anti-trump text messages. how hillary's team went on full frontal attack, jake sullivan, jennifer paul my airy, taking taking the alfa bank story to the media, sussman taking it to the fbi. durham indictment is saying somehow, somebody broke into the executive branch to access, probably internet data in order to try to connect trump to russia, meaning the trump alfa bank story. i know msnbc is still pushing on this. the fbi has debunked it. if you're breaking into the executive branch of the pentagon, darpa is in the executive branch. what were they doing? >> the whole predicate for their analysis and their diving into it was just simply not there. when they did know this dossier was bogus and not verified, yet you still had officials signing a fisa warrant, signing the warrant and verifying data and information at same time they knew it was false how come somebody i

durham indictment from the steele dossier, let me back up.k to do so the phony trump russia alfa bank story, nsa jake sullivan is the foreign policy advisor, anonymously in there but he is the guy who was on the email chain about the trump russia -- excuse me the trump organization communicating with russia's alfa bank. the fbi debunked that as trump hotel marketing spam emails. your final word. >> jake sullivan, there is no indication he did anything wrong but he was on the receiving end of these emails. it is interesting to see where the probe goes. a lot of smart people who follow this stuff believe durham is laying foundation for wider conspiracy charge that could include some very senior people, well-known people who were engaged in this. hillary clinton and the dnc top guru along with mark mark elias seemed involved but those we'll see but those are the allegations. elizabeth: jason chaffetz, thank you. al gore is out there fear-mongering. he is saying artificial intelligence companies are hooking up with climate change activists to ram

that's their own text message and as for the three indictments john durham issued i believe he built clinton campaign, dnc, law firm and fusion gps funneling tens of millions of dollars to perpetuate the biggest fraud in american history into the fbi. maria: tom bevan, you were with me those years when i was reporting and getting attacked for it to your thoughts what's taken place since? >> well, it's taken a long time for the truth to come out, but finally it's coming out. i don't know, maria, if there will be accountability, i mean, he was in the middle of this and watch the whole thing unfold, but that i did-- and he vacated has his pension restored and the idea he will face accountability, i'm just not sure it's going to happen, but i think what durham's probe is proving is what you just said that there was collusion, but with the clinton campaign in terms of how they were working this and injected it to the fbi. the media was a willing participant. we see some scrutiny and reflection on that, not a lot, but a little bit. i think we will learn more as durham's probe continues and

the indicts have been handed down by john durham. they are shocking. shocking to me but should be shocking to the american public. they should really lock the mainstream media but they're not. thereby and large being ignored. we had a few muted corrections but it should trouble every american how the fbi, how the department of justice covered up and were involved in this hoax against the trump campaign, the trump administration. the deep state is very deep and it should trouble every american. elizabeth: it looks like durham in his indictment sees the steele dossier as largely a hillary clinton campaign paid for, funded fiction. the danger is that russian disinformation got into that dossier and got into the fbi. the durham indictments are indicating the fear of that. what do you say? >> well, yes, i mean what has been revealed the alfa bank allegation was also cooked up by people affiliated with the clinton campaign but remember, we had a fisa report from inspector general horowitz that in the body of the report it said that bill priestap said there w

now this is part of that john durham probe, and it's worth mentioning both the original investigation and this one have both been labelled with politicized by critics and supporters of donald trump. like it's been a highly divisive issue. but why is this significant? because if dungeon is found guilty and he has already been charged, this makes him a 3rd person to have criminal action bought against him. as a result of this problem, we've had one cybersecurity law charged again with lying to the f. b i. as part of this probe a federal agent last year meeting to offering an email with regards this probe. so, and the more john durham digs the more he finds, and certainly if there are more arrests and charges, it's anyone's guess as to just how deep this probe could go into that original investigation and a trump brush of collusion. so we will be keeping an eye across the story and bring any further developments as they come in, just as a show, if you throw enough mud, it takes an awful long time to wipe it all off for thanks for the update, then i spoke to private investor and right to

i supported the durham investigation.ers is that they only tried to shut down the durham investigation. now we're seeing all of this information that would not have been disclosed without his investigation and he looks like he is just getting started. this does not strike me as an apex defendant. i think durham is going further. >> bill: i would read -- you say durham is described as either painfully methodical or positively glacial as a prosecutor but marches on in his legal case. jonathan turley, nice to see you. >> dana: democrats are moving full steam ahead on biden's massive social spending plan with a vote later today. has anyone looked at the thousands of pages of fine print released only last night? newt gingrich weighs in next. the biden administration passing the buck to the private sector as the supply crisis gets worse by the day. jonathan hunt live from l.a. and he has this preview. hi, jonathan. >> if you are worried about getting the things you need delivered in time for the holidays, president biden's comm

john durham continues to unravel the case.arned from the probe so far and where the investigation goes next week i'm back. ♪♪ i'm not guilty, russia analyst source for the steel dossier. charged with five counts of lying to the fbi about providing information from a british spy christopher field for the democratic document. the case against him as part of special counsel john brown's investigation into the origins of the fbi 2016 trump russia probe into march 3 so what have we learned so far from those who have been charged? we are back with hilfiger kim strassel kim, you've been following this closely. from all these indictments, brought together for our audience. >> i think two main things. we are now finding out dossier which we referred to for so long as the steel dossier has clinton's campaign fingerprints all over from the beginning to the end not only the democratic national clinton campaign, commissioner, a law firm and research outfit but now it turns out we know one of the characters named in the most recent indictme

this is a crucial part of the ongoing probe by special prosecutor john durham. has details tonight from the justice department. >> his name is igor, he is charged with five counts of lying to the fbi. he made an appearance in court this afternoon, we were there as he left court. special counsel john durham said a russian national living in northern virginia was the primary source for british spy christopher steele who compiled the widely talked about steele dossier full of accusations about president donald trump. the indictment alleges he lied to the fbi about working for christopher steele as his primary source of information prickled this afternoon he appeared in federal court in the eastern district of virginia with a judge released him with no electronic monitoring, the indictment also mentioned his involvement with someone identified as p.r. executive 1, someone believed to be close to the clinton operation. him he was the third defendant to be charged in john durham's two and a half year probe looking at the origins of the investigation into trump and his

>> my winner is john durham who has done such good work on unraveling some of this terrible stuff thed trump was a russian agent. my loser is major league baseball and rob manfred who banned atlanta from hosting the all-star game because he threw a temper tantrum about georgia's work on election integrity and had to give the award to the atlanta braves when they won the world series this week. >> bret: that's exactly right. okay, panel. thank you. make a great weekend. when we come back, it is friday and that means "notable quotables." ♪ wealth is breaking ground on your biggest project yet. worth is giving the people who build it a solid foundation. wealth is shutting down the office for mike's retirement party. worth is giving the employee who spent half his life with you, the party of a lifetime. wealth is watching your business grow. worth is watching your employees grow with it. principal. for all it's worth. metastatic breast cancer is relentless, but i'm relentless every day. and having more days is possible with verzenio, proven to help you live significantly longer when taken

for example right now jake sullivan, a national security adviser he was mentioned in durham's report, but the lawyer for hillary clinton, who was paid by dnc to get the dodgey dossier contacted sullivan when he was working for hillary clinton and campaign. pushed a lie that the trump towers was paying off of a russian bank, called alpha bank, we knew that lies started with the hillary clinton campaign and those connected to it i think what john durham will do continue to follow the leads down that road, i really hope, that he does not stop. i really hoped that the department of justice does not swipe under the rug the people they want to flow under the rug, and they expose everything and everyone, and ern is under hillary clinton. clinton. steve: we talked about names that keep coming back. last week it was fiona hill. this week jake sullivan. he just, he was i think, now you know focusing on foreign policy, he was her main poll visaed visor. >> yes. there are many lawmakers who find him a terrible policy adviser. and now we have a lot of lawmakers calling for him to resign because of

durham is doing the best he can do.merican people a story which is very important so that people finally understand what happened here. so the indictments are very much based on the notion that some of these outside figures came in and told the fbi lies, essentially duped the fbi. that's a little incredulous, okay? there were so many moments when the fbi was tipped off to the fact that it was dealing with the clintons, and all it needed to do was dig a little further, and instead it closed its eyes. one other person this also needs to shine a spotlight on, bob mueller. he had every resource to look into any of this. his team, however, was made up of people who were at the k to oj when this happened -- the doj when this happened, and you've got to look at his report more and and more like a cover-up. david: absolutely. and, dan, there's one other organization which are these fisa courts. i mean, it just shows how they are little more than a rubber stamp for anything they're told to do by the fbi or other people who come

third arrest in durham's probe.ssed up to the fbi back in january of 2017 that he made it up, the content of the dossier were made up. we reported this at the time when lindsey graham declassified those documents in 2020. here is the senator. >> the russian sub source was on the payroll of christopher steele and had a working relationship with the brookings institute and we have learned from the memo that we declassified that the russian sub source who was american-based not russian-based told christopher steele, here is what i've got, far talk, rumor, it's not really reliable and what did christopher steele do with that? he turned into a novel and sold it to the fbi, and they sold to the pfizer court to get a warrant against carter page and on january 2017 when they found the russian sub-source who was in the united states he disavowed the dossier as being reliable. the fbi knew it and did a 40-page memo but the fbi continued to lie to the court getting new warrants based on the dossier in april and june of 2017 af

my deposition is in the durham indictment. he had no idea what sussman was saying. yet the indictment shows communications between jake sullivan and michael sussman about the russia gate hoax. either he lied to congress or he is lying in the indictment. >> dana: when he had that conversation was that during the campaign or after the president was in office? >> it was -- that conversation was during the campaign. he testified in 2017. >> bill: how much money did you pay for lawyers? >> going over $100,000 right now and it's just keeps going. i had to fight with cash.com and try to get the money. >> bill: andy mccarthy was on with us yesterday and appeared with the clip yesterday and you just feel the angst k.t. had in her voice. she made a commitment to move to washington, d.c. and work in the house and she had to go underground for about three years. it is quite the price to pay. andy mccarthy argued that it looks bad. it looks really bad but it is not criminal. >> what's that? >> dana: lying about the dossier. >> andy mccarth

so it is, though, what john durham is going after, and we'll see whether he has more to bring in thesean perez, thank you so much. >>> now, to a big development in the kyle rittenhouse trial in kenosha, wisconsin. the now 18-year-old is accused of killing two people, injuring a third last year during a protest over alleged police brutality. today a judge dismissed one of the jurors after he apparently told a joke about the police shooting of jacob blake that sparked the unrest. >> blake's uncle says his family is, quote, disturbed and disgusted by this joke. meanwhile, there's new fbi aerial surveillance video that shows rittenhouse moving towards a parking lot where joseph rosen balm was standing. this reveals never before seen moments before the interaction that led to that fatal shooting. an eye-witness told the jury what happened on the ground. >> i realized that mr. rosen baum was continuing to advance and mr. rittenhouse was standing still, wasn't clear to me whether the weapon would be grabbed or fired or what exactly was going to happen, but it was clear to me that it was a sit

breaking news on the story the durham investigation is heating up and the question is where and to whom might it lead? today you have a third person indicted by the grand jury in the courtroom. we are waiting to see him enter or exit. igor danchenko is a russian. there say picture of the man who has been indicted. danchenko pedalled facts and rumors to christopher steele used by the fbi as substance for their warrants turning into a full-blown investigation against president trump. this is a fascinating development in this story. in moments senator lindsey graham who helped expose all of this when he was chairman of the senate judiciary committee. first griff jenkins live outside of the courthouse in virginia. what is going on in there? >> good afternoon. well, we know that 43-year-old russian native danchenko is schedule this hour in the federal courthouse behind me. arrested this morning by the fbi. a 39 page indictment. he is facing 5 count of making false statements some pertaining to company reports which were sources of information that danchenko provided to christopher steele. th

this sort of guilty behavior is something that a man might durham to investigate, would have to have a bullet proof sort of evidence, which is why he's taking as much time in my view to put this plan together. the u. s. military has concluded that a botched drone strike carried out in afghanistan in august was not unlawful, and showed no sign of negligence. that despite the strike itself killing 10 civilians including 7 children and not a single terrorist, the american air force inspector general announced the probes findings. the investigation did found no violation of law including the law of war. did find execution errors confirmed by confir may or combined with confirmation bias and communication break. the breakdowns that regrettably lead to civilian casualties will that cobble drone attack was one of the final acts of the u. s. war in afghanistan, the pentagon, the 1st claim did a taken out an imminent threat and that it didn't appear to involve any civilian casualties. blue. busy the u. s. air force inspector general said his report on the strike will remain classified because

john durham is a no nonsense prosecutor. most of us forgot about him. well, now he is apparently cranking this out. and let me tell you is, i mean, it's about time the u. s. military is concluded that a botched drones strike carried out in afghanistan in august was not unlawful and showed no sign of negligence. thus, despite the strike killing, 10 civilians including 7 children, another single tourist u. s. air force inspector general announced the probes findings. the investigation found no violation of law including the law of war. did find execution errors confirmed by confirmation, or are combined with confirmation bias and communication. greg, the breakdowns that regrettably lead to civilian casualties. the cobbled during the time was one of the 5 lengths of the earth war in afghanistan, the pentagon. the 1st claimed it had taken out an imminent threat and didn't appear to involve any civilian casualties. oh. busy you are safe or suspected general said his report on the strike will remain classified because it contains details of the melodies air s

so the more john durham digs the more he finds, and certainly if there are more risk in charges, it's anyone's guess is to just how deep this probe could go into that original investigation at a trump, russia collusion legal media analyst lionel told us he has reservations, about legitimacy of the trump, russia, dosier. they based all of this surveillance on lie after lie after lie down was stitched together and put into this thing called a da ca. for some reason, a pack of lies is elevated. does i mean, is superior status by giving it the audrey fancy, sch, mancy da, ca. and i've been wondering for the longest time, how is this possible? now when you throw when to fact that mr. dan jango is our russian. well that she no more, but the problem with our corrupt left is shadow government media is that they don't want to say, ah, there was cur. oh, wait a minute. maybe there was russian collusion, but not with trump. maybe we colluded were there, russia? so you can see right now as we speak, this corporate media being very careful not to say too too much about this, john durham is a no no

durham claims danchenko was in touch with someone listed in the indictment as p.r. executive 1, a man named chuck dolan who happens to be a long-time confidante of bill and hillary clinton. dolan has not been charged with a crime and his attorney tells fox news no comment. durham appears to be building a pattern linking clinton contacts to the russian investigation. former current aid and current white house national security adviser jake sullivan is the foreign policy adviser mentioned in the indictment of another key defendant former clinton campaign attorney michael sussmann. sussmann was charged in september with also lying to the fbi for failing to disclose his work for the clinton campaign when he delivered information about alleged connections between donald trump and the kremlin via a russian bank that information turned out to be false. according to the indictment, another campaign attorney sent information to a foreign policy adviser sullivan concerning the russian bank allegations. mike, there is no indication that jake sullivan is under investigation or

this sort of guilty behavior is something that a man like durham to investigate, would have to have a bullet proof set of evidence, which is why he's taking as much time in my view to put this plan together. and i think he's probably got people singing to him and he's probably much further ahead than the market perceives. and i hope he does. there a work you. i mean, it just makes my mind wandered to the often herds. an inside source is here, media outlets often saying ab, somewhat inside the government has told me this and, and it's quite damaging towards somebody else. and we, we take all of these things coming from these sources here. never revealed when we take them as gospel often to this show that high level officials can and will lie if it seats them politically. we should be extremely skeptical about believing anybody. certainly they don't put their name forward as to, i mean i think this is a period in eyesight which may be known as a period when, why seem true? and we could go pretty far back to 1989 to sell. and globalism is a good idea for people in the western advanced co

because john durham is a no nonsense prosecutor. most of us forgot about him. we heard about him. he was almost mythical and mysterious. we never saw it. we saw one picture we saw over while now he is apparently cranking this out. and let me tell you something, it's about time because we got this case as you said. so astutely, we thought it just vanished. what line of if you all one of those people who funded this piece of work, let's call it this dossier and you approved it. you funded it? would you be sweating now? oh bro. few actually i would be a not the prince andrew version, but the opposite of that. i would be soaked in perspiration. but here's the thing. here is my question. did you ever know that this story, mr. dan? jungle was a lie, you heard, and i know that had a family show. i'm not going to go into details about what mr. trump apparently solicited. some a court is in is to do a soiling the pur calles of a, of a russian bed, which i don't understand why, but anyway, did you at any time? no, this was false. did you at any time know that this was not true? did anybody