of course, in the late 50s, it began to be published and was read in dushevshenko.the way, i left a successful article events. i was told they corresponded heard about it. well, in general, it is, yes it is. yes. indeed, it was so much more appreciated. actually, three things. uh, firstly, the so-called courage , that is, to say that the other, for other censorship editorial reasons, did not dare to say, for example, for the first time i quoted gumilyov, whom i then loved very much without naming. she said already, as one old poet said and then it was so fashionable. i remember the collection of the institute of slavic studies was canisters, where in the note there are wonderful two sugars vyacheslavovich ivanov nikolayevich axes are both dead now, and the oksky gave another footnote. and there it was. as you say, and as said for nonsense for failures for loss. his dear and for the fact that it could be otherwise for the fact that there is no need for another georgy ivanov mr. v. ivanov remember the rules, however, i remember exactly this quatrain, because i saw him