i'm placing them today in the library and we will send them to the duval administration. nobody should doubt we intend to get to the bottom of the truth and learn for the future. next, to take over bskyb. we are hearing allegations. allegations they were in the pay of the news of the world and handed over the contact details for the royal family for profit. the former prime minister gordon brown had his assistances flagged. as the alleged nature of the malpractice and the scope of the newspaper involved widens, serious questions must be asked about news corporations proposed to take over of bskyb. added to this, news according has withdrawn the undertaking in view of the reference to the competition. that why on monday, my right honorable friend, the secretary of state for culture, media, and support referred their bid to the competition exhibition. the relevant independent authorities will have the time now to take an exhaustive look at the relative issues and come to a decision on whether the takeover should proceed. it will then be up to the secretary of state to make

are happy with the terms of reference to work out how the inquiry is going to relate to the duval administration and any evidence can be put into the inquiry in the way i suggest. >> mr. speaker, even if private medical details are obtained without breaking the law, it doesn't mean they are right to publish, especially when it relates to a child. can the prime minister confirm the inquiry will consider and recommend what meaningful actions can be taken when they didn't act against the law, but standards and ethics. >> the lady makes a good point. we will look at that. what regulatory people you have, you still have to have people at the top of newspapers and media organization who take responsibility. who recognize it's not right to reveal someone is pregnant, for instance, when there's no certainly they'll keep the baby. these are important things about common sense and den sen si. whatever regulatory system we come up with, we need to keep all of that thought too. >> stephen timms. >> chief of staff from the guardian? >> i think i've answered the question in detail. the information wasn't pass