SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
37
37
Mar 6, 2021
03/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 37
favorite 0
quote 0
i also want to reiterate the commitment made by dvi to my staff on the record here which is that theyill promulgate administrative regulations and present them to this board of supervisors as to what constitutes substantial noncompliance in that subsection 4 that miss beinart just reference and what constitutesquote unquote egregiousnoncompliance inthe next agent , section 106 a 1038.6 .272 . and finally, it's not lost on me or i think on many of us that in some ways and i don't mean this critically, we have some fox guarding the hen house issues here and i just want to say for the record that i want dvi and the building community to understand that supervisor ronen in my office will be monitoring implementation of this ordinance closely and one thing in particular that i will be watching is whether we see a spike in notices of correction or notices by previously issued because the former notices of corrections are not implicated in this ordinance and don't get you on the enhanced tracking list butthe latter notices of violation do and if that becomes the case , i believe supervisor r
i also want to reiterate the commitment made by dvi to my staff on the record here which is that theyill promulgate administrative regulations and present them to this board of supervisors as to what constitutes substantial noncompliance in that subsection 4 that miss beinart just reference and what constitutesquote unquote egregiousnoncompliance inthe next agent , section 106 a 1038.6 .272 . and finally, it's not lost on me or i think on many of us that in some ways and i don't mean this...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
36
36
Mar 4, 2021
03/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 36
favorite 0
quote 0
i also want to reiterate the commitment made by dvi to my staff on the record here which is that theygate administrative regulations and present them to this board of supervisors as to what constitutes substantial noncompliance in that subsection 4 that miss beinart just reference and what constitutesquote unquote egregiousnoncompliance inthe next agent , section 106 a 1038.6 .272 . and finally, it's not lost on me or i think on many of us that in some ways and i don't mean this critically, we have some fox guarding the hen house issues here and i just want to say for the record that i want dvi and the building community to understand that supervisor ronen in my office will be monitoring implementation of this ordinance closely and one thing in particular that i will be watching is whether we see a spike in notices of correction or notices by previously issued because the former notices of corrections are not implicated in this ordinance and don't get you on the enhanced tracking list butthe latter notices of violation do and if that becomes the case , i believe supervisor ronen and i
i also want to reiterate the commitment made by dvi to my staff on the record here which is that theygate administrative regulations and present them to this board of supervisors as to what constitutes substantial noncompliance in that subsection 4 that miss beinart just reference and what constitutesquote unquote egregiousnoncompliance inthe next agent , section 106 a 1038.6 .272 . and finally, it's not lost on me or i think on many of us that in some ways and i don't mean this critically, we...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
26
26
Mar 8, 2021
03/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 26
favorite 0
quote 0
the other question i have is it's more a dvi directed question i'm seeing over 75 eight because of a fire code or anticipation of fire code cannothave a roof deck . how does that apply here i think we could talk about that for decades. i'd like to see a clear answer to that question because it would change this project in a significant way. >>linda hoagland: the project still has 16 noncompliance issues relative to yard exposure but the majority of these do have theproper exposure which is good . i have a question regarding the size of the roof deck and why is the roof deck forwarding back in a more concise way from adjoining properties because we don't do not know as well in the future that there will be a similar building from the left to the right so my ask is when you go todraw 8.2.5 , will that be present? >>joel koppel: do you have a roof plan there? >>kathrin moore:it's called 418245 . you see the planter areas on the left side and on the right side of the project? i'd like to see that the railing is held inbound to the planters so that you will not see from the adjoining site
the other question i have is it's more a dvi directed question i'm seeing over 75 eight because of a fire code or anticipation of fire code cannothave a roof deck . how does that apply here i think we could talk about that for decades. i'd like to see a clear answer to that question because it would change this project in a significant way. >>linda hoagland: the project still has 16 noncompliance issues relative to yard exposure but the majority of these do have theproper exposure which...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
27
27
Mar 6, 2021
03/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 0
the other question i have is it's more a dvi directed question i'm seeing over 75 eight because of a fire code or anticipation of fire code cannothave a roof deck . how does that apply here i think we could talk about that for decades. i'd like to see a clear answer to that question because it would change this project in a significant way. >>linda hoagland: the project still has 16 noncompliance issues relative to yard exposure but the majority of these do have theproper exposure which is good . i have a question regarding the size of the roof deck and why is the roof deck forwarding back in a more concise way from adjoining properties because we don't do not know as well in the future that there will be a similar building from the left to the right so my ask is when you go todraw 8.2.5 , will that be present? >>joel koppel: do you have a roof plan there? >>kathrin moore:it's called 418245 . you see the planter areas on the left side and on the right side of the project? i'd like to see that the railing is held inbound to the planters so that you will not see from the adjoining site
the other question i have is it's more a dvi directed question i'm seeing over 75 eight because of a fire code or anticipation of fire code cannothave a roof deck . how does that apply here i think we could talk about that for decades. i'd like to see a clear answer to that question because it would change this project in a significant way. >>linda hoagland: the project still has 16 noncompliance issues relative to yard exposure but the majority of these do have theproper exposure which...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
31
31
Mar 27, 2021
03/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
we have thought out carefully how we are going to address those issues and i believe dvi will not require anything beyond the 20% requirement. >> have you confirmed with d.b.i. on that? >> we have spoken with them about the existing retail uses. we are not changing use at this location. >> if you had to put an elevator in here, you would have to provide a new entry. i would guess that this building is a board resource? >> it is. it is a 1917 victorian. >> okay. my fellow commissioners, i would support the location for this proposed use. however, i'm not supportive of the consumption lounge. >> commissioner moore? >> i have an additional question for mr. paul. you're consumption lounge has operable windows that are sliding from what i can tell. how do you ensure that these windows are accidentally not opened while they are in use? it is the dispersion of smoke that may bother other people and to ensure that the windows do remain closed. >> thank you, commissioner moore for that question. we will have an on-site monitor in the consumption lounge at all times to make sure that the system and
we have thought out carefully how we are going to address those issues and i believe dvi will not require anything beyond the 20% requirement. >> have you confirmed with d.b.i. on that? >> we have spoken with them about the existing retail uses. we are not changing use at this location. >> if you had to put an elevator in here, you would have to provide a new entry. i would guess that this building is a board resource? >> it is. it is a 1917 victorian. >> okay. my...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
45
45
Mar 29, 2021
03/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 45
favorite 0
quote 0
we have thought out carefully how we are going to address those issues and i believe dvi will not require anything beyond the 20% requirement. >> have you confirmed with d.b.i. on that? >> we have spoken with them about the existing retail uses. we are not changing use at this location. >> if you had to put an elevator in here, you would have to provide a new entry. i would guess that this building is a board resource? >> it is. it is a 1917 victorian. >> okay. my fellow commissioners, i would support the location for this proposed use. however, i'm not supportive of the consumption lounge. >> commissioner moore? >> i have an additional question for mr. paul. you're consumption lounge has operable windows that are sliding from what i can tell. how do you ensure that these windows are accidentally not opened while they are in use? it is the dispersion of smoke that may bother other people and to ensure that the windows do remain closed. >> thank you, commissioner moore for that question. we will have an on-site monitor in the consumption lounge at all times to make sure that the system and
we have thought out carefully how we are going to address those issues and i believe dvi will not require anything beyond the 20% requirement. >> have you confirmed with d.b.i. on that? >> we have spoken with them about the existing retail uses. we are not changing use at this location. >> if you had to put an elevator in here, you would have to provide a new entry. i would guess that this building is a board resource? >> it is. it is a 1917 victorian. >> okay. my...