what's important is to see whether the gunmen are dwoen to the authorities, whether there's intelligenceld have been put together and result in a plot that's unfoiled or disrupted. that's something to look at urgently because there have been failures of intelligence in the past such as with the shootings at the "charlie hebdo" magazine. >> that underscores how challenging it is to keep track of would-be extremists, right? it's difficult to prevent these gaps in security, so what is the solution here? i'm sure the fact that these attacks seemed well thought out and planned, they're probably looking at where the gaps were and how it could be prevented. >> this attack illustrates a level of synchronization and coordination that we've not seen before with isis. they're raising the stakes in the type of fear factor they want to perpetrator in western countries. means that the authorities are going to have to pay more attention to individual cells. are these individuals who have been trained in syria or iraq by isis, or are they inspired by the group, where did they procure weapons? are there