it does make me think about dworkin, ronald dworkin who is famous for the phrase judge as hercules or the so-called robust herculean jurisprudence. i think you are asking for a similarly herculean task for our judges, to scrutinize every law. >> i read dworkin as a piker. i will tell you what. >> i'm not saying you agree with him. >> he believes in hercules, i believe in hercules squared. let me see if i can explain. because ronald dworkin, gifted as he was, had only a single theme that he thought translated into various kinds of positive spot. he did not have a systematic theory. his domain was theoretically rich but it was confined. mine has no such constraints, it is a theory of the world. it might be wrong, but it is more ambitious. >> i think you are alike in that you and work in both would put it in a government by judiciary. >> no, absolutely not. the me explain why -- let me explain why as to the distributional authority. on taxation, i have strong views. but i think the government can set a general revenue. i am a violently opposed to indeterminate progressive taxes. but it i