thank you so much. >> commissioner dyman. >> i'm in favor. i support the action. i'm a little anxious about the on-site consumption. he's saying he's not going to do it but he could go and do it. it sounds like there wouldn't be a public hearing. especially because there's residents above, that i would want to add a condition that if he wants to propose on-site consumption, it could come back. i would be open to having it come back here for any type of on-site consumption. >> just to clarify, i've gotten some updates from staff. a building permit would be required for on-site consumption if they so chose in the future. and the commission does have the authority to request a mandatory d.r. of that building permit if it happened in the future. there is so mechanism for the commission to kind of get additional review if they so -- if the applicant chose to go in that path. >> would we be approving that as a condition now saying if they want to do on-site consumption as part of the building permit -- >> the last part of your packet is about on-site consumption, we can