e, blinkin e, makes his way to kiev along rural roads in a car that did not fly, but do not fly.ows erdogan, that is. 400 shoots down everything, including invisible aircraft american, which they themselves may not see. and there are 400 see, so you need to do. here are the conclusions from the real situation. if you want to help kiev, but fly away on planes, uh, supplying real weapons, u viktor petrovich the rostov region, which we represent the state duma, has always been a flagship in relations with the honestly parliamentary assembly of the black sea basin. and therefore, turkish stories are also quite close to you. so, what do you think, erdogan will still let finland through, based on e, on our e ancestors who always fought with the turks, the don cossacks, so our ancestors said that if the turks did not defeat you, then he would kiss your hand until he reached the shoulder. this is the truth, so now erdogan, seizing the moment as well. in fact, such tough statements are understood. and his hour has come, today he dictates a certain position in nato and based on this, he ba

let's hear what us secretary of state e blinkin says about the new strategy of the alliance the core of nato, the core of the strategic concept is the concept of defense and deterrence , which led to the creation of the alliance and this concerns. including the deterrence of any aggression, on the part of russia of protection against it, i can say with confidence, that this will be fully reflected in the new strategic concept. michael means something to us here, but here are the moments to which i would like to draw the attention of de facto and finland, sweden in fact. already is a country. it 's true. this is what we must be accountable for. and what is happening now, in addition to the entry of these two countries into legal registration in blocs, and here is also a provocative statement against this background. we must carefully consider them, because we are now already hearing from the side of the americans from the side more precisely, the poles, who seem to have nothing to do with this direct institution. this is a direct relationship situation. they say that now there is a ne

we openly yes because of the wings, and openly include both barrel and e, blinkin of an outstanding diplomateverything must be decided on the battlefield. here, that is, they stuffed ukraine there, look, let's say. here now look fell. yes, i do not want to guess, but there will be a circumstance. mm, in a military sense, very unpleasant for ukraine. that's how i will say it, and it seems to be like according to your scenario. we should make an agreement. and now i'm going to ask everyone. and what do you think, in this situation they will give zelensky? well , of course not. it's also obvious. you understand what the problem is maxim because you described the healthy logic of the subject, that is, from the other side. here he himself will not be dmitry the fact is that he is part of his society of his page. if they are set to they just talked about winning, no, you are not discussing what i said, here. mariupol is one episode of one lost battle on the fronts of the war. they call it a war that they think ours will win, so they will not go to any compositions now would be in place. zelensky i

e declared it blinkin declared.state, uh, and other administration figures, but as soon as it smells of fried , we have nothing to do with it, we do not participate in anything. this is, in fact, the business of russia and ukraine a. a. she is not involved in anything. it is, of course, very a strange position, and we already said on your program that it seems to the americans that they have seized such an opportunity to do whatever they want and evade responsibility. but the way he talks about it now in sake shows only one thing. here is the statement of the russian leadership. a very consistent position of the ministry of foreign affairs, the minister's statement. lavrov on this score. they create fewer and fewer opportunities for them to cheat, or you admit that you are playing this game, and then you will be responsible for responsibility in fact you are a party to the conflict. and even if it doesn’t come to the great war, then at least we will negotiate with you, too, or if you have nothing to do with it, then

other countries that have allocated military aid to us, and today, just symbolically, secretary blinkin e approved the distribution of just the last 100 millions of dollars, which, uh, while we are talking, the pentagon is already actively working on it in order to start sending very important equipment that our defenders really need, well, we are very actively receiving it from the united states states 155th so-called caliber, that is, howitzers that have shown their effectiveness on the battlefield, as well as other useful things from our list of priorities eh, but eh, today is also a historic vote on changes to the budget, eh, an additional additional budget for ukraine of 40 billion - in which there is also military additional aid quite significant in which there is budget aid and for the first time the united states allocates such a huge sum, namely 8.5 billion dollars, most of which will go directly to the budget in the form of non-repayable grant aid specifically in ukraine in at the same time markarova adds and the priority in cooperation with american partners remains the acquisi

e with blinkin completely agree, really. china is by far one of the most globalist countries. e.e blinds her eyes before a sober rational assessment of what is happening. it seems to me that there is a huge ground for both russia and china, and not only for, let's say, for other countries, uh, that have grown up in this new globalist system, but have become stronger, but for cooperation. and this, of course, is what will worry the americans, because they will lose their economic strength. the main thing is that worries or really that for 46 years in a row, china has a higher economic growth than the united states of america 40-6 years in a row. and it will continue . and for the foreseeable future, america will never catch up with china. the main goal, of course, of american policy is now the current situation, when nothing works. you are trying to distance china from both russia and blinkin's speech as far as it can work in this direction. can she move china closer to the united states somehow divide us in my opinion, no way. if blinkin achieved something. he antagonized even mo

blinkin the united states secretary of state. and who is unexpected. recovered from covid took part in the summit ethe summit, but at the meeting ministry, and nato in berlin, by the way, the question arises. and where is blinkin's furious performance in china, yes, which he promised and which somehow disappeared. yes, in china, the blinken is silent, but in russia and of the new nato strategic concept, blinkin says that nato will fix the defeat of the provision on the need to deter any aggression against russia precisely any yes, that is, regardless of nato or e. for any other country. igor yurievich is, but, how would such a psychological or mental offensive? or is it a dangerous game? because if that's true, then what they're going to, uh, proclaim in a new strategic concept. yes, if this is not psychological pressure on russia in the current circumstances, it's actually very much like that. it seems to me a dangerous question. i don't think it's psychological pressure that's prepared. indeed, the fact that the alliance will expand its zone of operations, or a proxy warrior outside the tradition

not to mention e leadership, but so far it seems like e hmm blinkin did not speak, but nonetheless.me recent uh, president biden's visit to asia when he visited seoul and especially tokyo and that's exactly what gave a very powerful impetus to the tightening of american policy towards china in general and , regarding the main conflict, the most acute problems of us-china relations. let me remind you that biden answered the question in the affirmative in tokyo. will the united states go to war against china if china tries to take back taiwan by force, and although the white house was quick to disavow the president's statement, on in fact, the entire world community heard what biden said and another confirmation of this , uh, is an interview with the former prime minister. japan's shinzo aba, who just welcomed this change in american policy on taiwan. listen to synth. the statement actually sends us a signal that the us is starting to rethink its policy in the region, and i have been a proponent of changing this controversial strategy since the us was adopting it, there is a huge mili

blinkin. eh, he's trying. looks like the cream has already been skimmed off. e.germany's position on the fact that there is an agreement on some kind of oil embargo. well, uh, they do not reduce the activity of their diplomatic, because this is a parallel effort. yes, there is military, as they said, and diplomatic. that is, now the client is ready, so to speak, without leaving the cash register. well , they are trying to do uh so that they switch the market to themselves. uh liquefied natural gas european is unlikely to succeed, therefore, by the way, speaking blinken after europe goes to the united arab emirates because the americans. well there are no free resources this has been talked about a lot and uh it's called as be afraid of what you wish for. they may come true. so they wanted russia to somehow lose its position in, uh, the european market. russia has not lost. it's still far from that. and they have already, in general, the argumentation in this sense has ended. evgeny olga valentin retains sober thinking, in fact on wednesday night will not vote on

blinkin clearly outlined at this meeting that it is about continuing to actively work in three main directions, namely the first is element the sanctions that have already been announced, those that have already been implemented and work on new ones. the second is to help ukraine militarily and the third is to help in diplomatic efforts. allies in north america to respond to the change in the security situation in europe and what putin has done, what russia has done now with this invasion of ukraine has created, as we said at the beginning of this conversation, such a political earthquake in europe, which in particular changes the position and e the work of nato, and in particular, today in an interview with the ukrainian voice of america, the american political scientist i obozhynsky spoke about this, this is what he focused his attention on, i think that as a result of this war, nato will seriously rethink its strategy and position when it comes to the defense of its territory of its states members and strengthening the strength and stability of peace in the odesa region, the genre is something that could happen a

e history of our war. an attempt to transfer the realities of that time to an event modern in ukraine is absolutely unproductive to her. i would say it is meaningless, therefore, what blinkinn world said, trying, as it were, to revive. uh, the idea of ​​european unity against the struggle in the common, the struggle against a certain dictatorship is an absolutely unrealistic idea, and i believe that there is no constructive behind them. it's just a wish. now once again, it hurts more, uh, bite. what is called russia and, frankly, i have no doubt that the edict of allergy signed by biden on may 9 is not accidental. i think that he has advisers and they are here prompted the soviet union to use anglic during the war, of course, he was not alone, but he used it. yes, it was and and we were considered for it, by the way, for the ruble dollar for the dollar, we all repaid the debt with them. and now he is signing this act. on such a day in relation to ukraine, and i think that this blasphemy is actually blasphemy. here, ask me. i'm certainly mistaken, but for europe the great patriotic war. by no means great for them great she is the first, that is, usually when they they talk

e comrades sisi and in addition, this has already been said. uh, the mobilization of all possible pro-american forces around china, that is. uh, blinkin's uh is the word that the colleague uttered in confusion. uh, strategic confusion. it is they are not understand. well, how to act? yes and uh, russia with china demonstrates good partnership relations. and i think that the chinese would even like to call them differently. somehow, at negotiations in china in the mgb, i uttered the word allied by chance, so then i was at or in the international department of the central committee of the communist party of china and they tried to have me say this word a few more times. yes, they are ready to call it differently, yes, although , of course, they have their own program, their interests, we do not forget about them, but here's the word confusion american in relation to china and, uh, these relations between russia and china, it is obvious, but it’s just obvious that it’s true, and if, uh, today anthony blinkin tried to drive a wedge in relation to russia and china, then he clearly failed. i think on the contrary, he pushed the chinese moveme