angela began receiving e-mails, too. >> long, rambling e-mails saying that, you know, her husband ian michelle is, you know, his one true love, and that ian is cheating on her, he manipulates women, she better get out of the picture soon before he hurts her. >> these new e-mails to angel all sounded like michelle's e-mails to ian, complete with biblical imagery, but they came from multiple e-mail addresses and were signed jason ray. >> telling angela she would always be eve and that michelle was his lilith, his truth, and angela never would be his one true love. >> then another e-mail appear to angela, the subject line die. i hope you are scared of death tomorrow. be prepared, don't sleep. be watchful of the daughters of guy. the e-mail continues, we will steal your child and watch as it dies. when she looked to see who sent the e-mail it was from michelle hadley. >> you can understand why angela would be so rattled. >> right. >> a barrage of e-mails arrived. be warned, you have lost, you will suffer, i will pray for you. on june 1st, the next morning, angela filed for a restraining o

atlanta based e-mail marketing platform e chimp. today the company is doing more than half a billion dollars in revenue and it's likely you have an e-mail powered by them in your inbox right now. >> we send about a billion e-mails a day. >> as you walk around their offices it feels like a silicone valley tech company, cool art and modern architecture, a casual environment but where mail chimp differs from many fast growing companies is in the financing. >> you've taken how much money in outside funding? >> i haven't taken any. >> that's right. it's 100% owned by the founders. in spied of the formidable competition they used only the company's profit to grow. >> was there ever a time you thought hey, if we want to go -- if we want to grow quickly we need an infusion of a lot of cash right now? >> i don't think we ever said if we want to grow quickly p we wanted deep strong roots so speed was never an issue. >> they believe their advantage was their deep knowledge of their small business customer. so ben and dan never went out to get

an e-mail in that was back you know fifteen and sixteen there's an e-mail reportedly from peter where he said we know that foreign actors got a hold of some of hillary's emails so that that we know so it all does make some kind of sense. look i was particularly taken when the donald trump said are you sure it wasn't russia i thought that was a great line and we're going to want to do that she wants but but but we don't why should we believe this really i mean it's not beyond the the realm of. possibility china was accused just a few months ago of infiltrating and hacking the navy and co and some some specific submarine anti-ship missiles and all that stuff getting the plans for them and all that so china we know is very active in the espionage i think they learned it from watching not perfectly honest they probably got it as fast hence it is kind of why this is a bad idea but what do you think if this indeed happened a chinese company that may or may not have connections to their government has access to clinton's e-mail during that time. what kind of fallout could we see of a securit

hillary clinton turned over 30,000 e-mails, deleted 33,000, so that's 63,000. but on the laptop, they found almost 700,000. so that's got to be a lie by comey, doesn't it? >> yes. it was also so stunning that pete bharara's office in the southern district of new york documented the fact there were 700,000 clinton e-mails on that because they were concerned it would come back to bite them. so everybody knew about it and everybody was trying to cover their you know whats and other people were trying to cover up the evidence. >> and comey extolling the virtues of modern technological and computer wizardry saying we were able to do it in a matter of days, which, you know, i always knew was preposterous. it turns out according to paul speary's investigation, that technical complications, in other words, computer glitches, actually prevented them from looking at the vast majority of these. so comey wasn't telling the truth about that, was he? >> no, he wasn't, and new york agents found that to begin with. that's why they noticed all the e-mails because they couldn't

. >>> an e-mail scam targeting restaurants and threatening to ruin their reputations if they do not pay out money. >> the chef said the e-mail said he needed to pay the money and they threatened to publicize fake photos he didn't. >> great food and word of mouth are key increased gent -- ingreetients to keep a restaurant running. >> this e-mail comes up and it said reputation. i was great. what's this. >> it said it was from a natasha nixon. i was hired by your competitor to wra negative press release about your restaurant. >> it said i don't think any of this is true but i'm going to do it. >> the e-mail asked for money or the fake photos would be sent to 500 news media companies. >> the language felt percentage and so it made it feel more real. >> water bar restauranted always received the e-mail. >> we started getting them from a variety of restaurants. >> the golden gate restaurant association received a string of reports. >> we've heard from 15 or 20. >> they immediately contacted the district attorney's office. >> it's a type of extortion. we're going to take the steps necessary a

he also the one who knew there were 6 65,000 e-mails on clinton file, entire clinton file of e-mail inork on laptop of anthony wiener, he his that, sat on it, redirecting attention of fbi for approximately 6 weeks to corrected of russia -- creation of russia collusion there, instead of looking at that evidence that fbi supposedly had been looking for, for months in the e-mail investigation. lou: and we still don't know where all of those emails are, we still don't know the context in the southern district as to what was motivating both prosecutors and the fbi itself as well as fbi new york office, because there is a strange quiet and of be on va sa -- and those e-mails we're star from far frie e-mail -- far from understanding let alone seeing the e-mails and linking them to appropriate actors and evens. >> we need anthony wiener laptop, mueller was head of fbi at the time those e-mails were being since, we know that president obama was using an alias to email her, and agents in new york said it was file of hillary clinton emile fohillary. and they shut down effort to get search wa warr

one e-mail caught his eye. >> this e-mail said reputation. i was like great. what's this. >> it was from a that tasha nixon, i was hired by your competitor to write a competitive press release. >> the e-mail said i don't think it's true but i'm going to do it the e-mail asked for money for the faked photos would be sent to 500 media. the language felt percentage so it made it feel more real. water bar restaurant received the e-mail two days earlier. >> we started getting them from a variety of different restaurants. >> the golden gate restaurant association received a string of reports from a wide range. >> we heard from 15 or 20 they received the little. >> it's a type of extortion. we're going to take the stops necessary and coordinate with the correct entities that investigate these. they want people to know about the scam in a business where survival rests on reputation. >> we're a small restaurant, 10 or 15 people per night can make or break us. >> any business that receives the scam e-mail should file with the ftc and notify the san francisco d.a. office

today, they are doing a half billion dollars in revenue and it's likely you have an e-mail powered byhem. as you walk around their offices, it feels like a silicon valley tech company, cool art, modern architecture. where mail chimp differs from fast growing companies is the financing. you have taken how much money in outside fund sng. >> zero. no funding. >> that's right. this company is 100% owned by the founders. in spite of the formidable competition, they used only the company's profits to grow. was there a time you thought, we are running a nice company, but if we want to grow quickly, we need an infusion of a lot of cash right now. >> i don't think we ever said, if we want to grow quickly. we wanted deep, strong roots. speed was never an issue. >> they believe their competitiveness was their small customer. they didn't need more money to know how to serve them. they never got angel venture funding. it felt isolating, like there was a club they didn't belong to. >> you have a chip on your folder, if you ever get mentioned in tech crunch, there's a typo in your name. we thought f

e—mailing in our own employee. —— employer. e—mailing in ourown time, employee. —— employer.easier said than done. thank you, all of you. i appreciate your input. keep your messages coming in, as you are doing. an american plus—size model has told this programme she cried when the uk editor of cosmopolitan asked her to be on the cover. there is it — let us know what you think. do you agree with tess holliday, that the cover will have a positive impact on millions of people with bodies like hers? she has been explaining how the magazine shoot came about.|j she has been explaining how the magazine shoot came about. i love it, to be an a glossy, where you can see my body, they have not altered how i look, it makes me feel really proud. how did it come about? i was in london, speaking for the cosmo conference that they did for self—made woman. we spoke quite a bit after, and probably about two weeks after i left london and came back home, she message me on instagram and said, how would you like to be a cosmo girl? is that the editor? yes, fara. i broke into tea rs editor? yes, fa

an e-mail in that was back you know fifteen and sixteen there's an e-mail reportedly from peter where he said we know that foreign actors got a hold of some of hillary's emails so that that we know so it all does make some kind of sense. look i was particularly taken when the donald trump said are you sure it wasn't russia i thought that was a great line and we're going to want to that but but but we know why shouldn't we believe this really i mean it's not the. on the the realm of possibility china was accused just a few months ago of infiltrating and hacking the navy and co and some some specific submarine anti-ship missiles and all that stuff getting the plans for them and all that so china we know is very active in the espionage i think they learned it from watching not perfectly honest they probably got it as fast ten such as kind of why this is a bad idea but what do you think if this indeed happened a chinese company that may or may not have connections to their government has access to clinton's e-mail during that time. what kind of fallout could we see of a security breach if

. >> yes. >> did donald trump know about the e-mails before they came out? >> vabsolutely. >> he knew about them? >> absolute yes. >> you're saying donald trump had a back channel? >> i'm not saying that you did. i'm going to expose what happened in the campaign and in the white house. >> tonight's panel is nbc's senior politics anchor. brett steven and zelina maxwell. that is a massive allegation. i've never heard anybody in the president's orbit, in the campaign, in the white house who said anything remotely that serious that he knew about the e-mails before wikileaks released them. what's your reaction? >> it's like she spoiled the finale for us. there are a lot of publicly known facts. there's some information in the indictments that's been released that leads us to believe the president may have known. we don't know for certain. your campaign manager knows. jared kushner knows. your son knows and you're one floor up. is it outside of the realm of the possibility to believe that the president may have been known in advance that russia had some illegally

he writes a stern e-mail. that same dude during this period goes and works for free on the trump campaign. >> nothing is for free. let's start with that premise. what he was doing was also trying to ingratiate himself with various oligarchs. offering to provide them updates on the campaign. that was one of the people that was providing him with all of that money during that time period. >> remember, the e-mail when he gets a job, he turns around and goes to kilimnick who is his deputy in ukraine, how do we use to get whole. has he seen. >> the exact same thing. there was a motive to his madness here. >> barbara, what is your sense of this trial. moved through the witnesses quickly. what do you see for next week? >> well, maybe we will or maybe we won't see rick gates. they are teeing up a summary witness. for many witnesses who have testified, a chart that has not been published to the jury. and have been asked have you verified the numbers in the chart. to sort of make it crystal clear to the jury what these

and then within an hour or so the e-mails are dumped by vicki -- wikileaks. donald trump ends up winning in november. the investigation still continul continue in the house and sena senate. let me ask you this important question for the country. is this the last time we will see russia involved in a presidential election? election? >> guest: before we have the next presidential election we have something you care very much about the midterm elections and one thing we read about in the book that didn't get a lot of attention at the time is the russian operations, not just focused on the presidential campaign they attacked the committee that supports the candidates and dumped information that was for the democratic candidates the very key races for the d. triple c.. they influenced the outcome of certain races in florida and elsewhere and didn't get a lot of attention because we were focused on the presidential. so certainly that is a strong sign that if they care to, they know how to do this again. you don't have the security systems and it is easy with dark m

mail which i was using the e-mail address of speeches to myself was never any accusation that i used any system to communicate classified information and it was inconsistent with justice department policy that's what they said that's what they do you broke the rules thanks well that's a good question and i think they actually say it that way they say it was they believe it was inconsistent with the policy the policy does allow what we say de minimus use of a private e-mail system to communicate actually think mine was consistent with that but i'm not going to fight about that porton thing as there's a difference between using a system to communicate classified content and using a system i really don't see it i really don't see it as a conflict with the clinton investigation but i get why specter general included it well not just inspector general chuck grassley princeton share of the senate judiciary committee june eighteenth he said it's disturbing that f.b.i. and police tasked with the best of getting secretary clinton including the former director appeared to think a strikingly si

and at 6:55 he received an e-mail from the c.e.o.te informing him of the horrendous news that the drug had failed the trial. 7:10 p.m., congressman collins responded to that e-mail. so as the indictment alleges, at least at 7:10 p.m., congressman collins was aware of the inside information. a minute later, congressman collins attempts to call his son. in the period of five minutes, there are six unsuccessful calls. if on -- on the seventh call as alleged in the indictment, congressman collins illegally tip his son cameron about the drug trial results so that his son cameron could trade on those results. later that evening on june 22 after cameron collins has the illegal insider trading information, cameron collins drives with his fiancÉe to his fiancÉe's parents house. they arrive at the house at 9:17 p.m. less than 20 minutes later at 9:34 p.m., his fiancÉe's mother is on the phone with her broker beginning the process of selling her shares of innate. the next morning on june 23, 7:42 a.m., cameron collins begins the process of sell

criticism that really jumped off the page was the department's revelation that you used a private e-mail account in violation of official protocol now from maryland who spent a year and a half investigating hillary clinton's handling of her own e-mail isn't this. it's not but it does reflect the fact that folks don't realize what clinton investigation was about it wasn't about her use of a non-governmental e-mail system it was about her handling of classified information and that's a very important best a geisha totally different from whether you're using her g.-mail which i was using the e-mail draft of speeches to myself was never any accusation that i used any system to communicate classified information and it was inconsistent with justice department policy that's what they said that's what they do you broke the rules they said well that's a good question i don't think they actually say it that way they say it was they believe it was inconsistent with the policy the policy does allow what we say de minimus use of a private e-mail system to communicate actually think mine was consiste

a lot of us prefer to use e-mail at work. and it turns out there's some phrases that are more annoying than others. adobe surveyed 1,000 people to find out which phrases irritate us the most. t this top of the list, not sure if you saw my last e-mail, >>t -- that was voted number one. es. and i deleted it. >> and the second one, per my last e-mail. o thir the list, per our conversations. >> just get rid of the per. > >> knowing which phrases to avoid mayel make your work day less stressful. >> or the other person's work day less stressful. >> you could respond to the e-mail. why do i have to wait for three days to respond to your e-mail. >> we have somebody here. >> thank you. this is somebody that doesn't have time to get to her e-mails. >> i don't read mine. i warn people. if you want ad to ryour e-mail, put my name in the subject line so i see it and open it. >> i'm glad you own tha >> otherwise, i don't look. that.nk i told ur boss if you don't put my name in the top of it, i'm not going to look at it. >> we're so busy. w

the e-mail that you put up is a really good e-mail.re is a line at the end of it, though, that wasn't in your visual that said, i thought you had this under control. >> interesting. >> if i were the prosecutor, i would hammer that home. it wasn't just i thought you had my tax returns under control. i gave you authority to take care of my finances. that gives agency that anything gates does is now on manafort. >> mimi, somewhat the bar of proof that you think the prosecution has to pass? meaning, it looks like manafort's defense is crimes may have taken place, but he didn't make it -- somehow he didn't do it on purpose, or he didn't realize it was happening -- admitting to something but not really. these are paper crimes. these are i didn't fim out the right forms crimes. first of all, is that what they are? second, so what? is that a so what to the jury, or does the prosecution have to prove that this -- well, he purposely did this? >> i think it depends which charges we're talking about. the bank fraud, for example, i think it's easie

hull ri clinton's e-mails. >> yes, that is our talker. >> did donald trump know about the e-mails before they came out? >> absolutely. >> he knew about them? >> absolutely. >> he knew about them before wikileaks releesased them. >> yes. >> you are saying that he had a back channel? >> you said that and i didn't. i will expose the corruption in the white house and i will continue to blow the whistle about it. >> but if he knew about the e-mails, what did he know? >> you are going to be having a press briefing at 2:30, and you can have your correspondent ask sarah huckabee sanders the question questions. >> what would you ask him? >> he could have spent all day tweeting me and condemned in a stronger term that he is not a racist and he squandered the opportunity, so there are a n number of things that the president should come clean about. >> were you asked can about roger stone? >> no, i was not. >> did you have communication with roger stone? >> no. >> could roger stone have been somebody who told him about e-mails? >> i think that roger stone is being investigated right now and rightful

e-mail server, during her time as secretary of state.ning me right now is the president obama judicial watch tom fitton. good to have you on the program thanks for joining us. >> you're welcome. maria: tell us about the lawsuit >> well, the latest lawsuit about john brennan, according to some liberal reporters who wrote a book last year or earlier this year, he talked to harry reed about the dossier shortly before the election. harry reed the former leader in the senate came away with the distinct impression that mr. brennan wanted that dossier out in the public so mr. reed, wrote a letter that became quickly public and so it happened and so we've asked about communications that the cia and brennan had with reed about this dossier and of course we've gotten stonewalled as usual in the federal court over it. maria: you've also been able to unearth a lot of documents good for you and congratulations on what you've been able to get, because so many of us would not know half of what took place had you not been pushing. now the president twee

. >> i actually spent a lot of the day writing my dad a nice big birthday e-mail.it send on that e-mail and was talking to georgia on gmail chat, i'll see you after this rehearsal. >> boom. >> boom. everything just began to shake. i was in an office chair with wheels. and so immediately as it started, the chairs began to slide. things began falling off the shelves. >> zach had never been in an earthquake. his co-workers knew this one was big. worried the building might collapse, they ran downstairs and out to the parking lot. but soon they were told it was okay, it was over. when the shaking stopped, the disaster was just beginning. there was a monster out there over the horizon called fate, and it was coming very fast. almost as soon as zach got back to his desk, warning sirens went off. even zach knew what that meant. if the tsunami was heading to his town of kuji two miles inland, what was it going to do on the coast in noda where georgia was? >> what had happened to georgia? had anyone in her town survived the tsunami? >>> coming up, zach knew he had to find he

employee managing deleted 33,000 e-mail e-mails. the fbi found no evidence that the e-mails were deleted delibera deliberately. clinton's team requested for the a ma e-mails to be deleted months before subpoena came. and requested all the e-mails relative to the subpoena had already been turned over to the state department. read it for yourself if you don't believe me. use your google machines. thank you, all, appreciate it. we will be back. i'm going to talk about the president's relationship with michael cohen. among other things. david axelrod is here. a flying machine? impossible! a personal' computer?! ha! smart neighborhoods running on a microgrid. a stadium powered with solar. a hospital that doesn't lose power. amazing. i like it. never gonna happen. what i just introduced you worto my parents.g? psst! craig and sheila broke up. what, really? craig and shelia broke up!? no, craig!? what happened? i don't know. is she okay? ♪ craig and sheila broke up! craig and sheila!? ♪ as long as office gossip travels fast, you can count

he writes a stern e-mail. hey, we've got this shared property, i've got to see those receipts for that furniture. that same dude during this period goes and works for free on the trump campaign. >> nothing is for free, let's start with that premise. what he was doing was also trying to ingratiate himself with various oligarchs. deripaska was one in particular. he was willing to provide updates on the campaign as it went along. that was one of the people providing him with all that money during that time period. >> remember, the e-mail -- let me just read that. when he gets the job he goes to const cont conconstantine clim neck and says how do we use my job to get whole. have they seen that i have this job? >> that's what he was using this for, to try to get back into that russian money, the exact same thing. there was a motive to his madness here. >> barbara, what is your sense about the arc of this? this trial, the judge has been cracking the whip, the testimony has gone very quickly. i think the prosecution

. >> and we're going to get the e-mails. the writers are going to get the e-mails if we don't do that.t' >> seth: thas right. >> but -- what the funny thing now is i'll use my google

and maureen hogg sent this e—mail about the coverage more widely...e of footage from theresa may's trip to africa this week garnered a great deal of attention on both social and mainstream media, as dan walker acknowledged on wednesday's breakfast. when trade is on the agenda, the news footage is usually full of factories, hard hats and the occasional high—vis jacket. but it is a rather different image that has attracted much comment so far. the prime minister dancing with schoolchildren in cape town. the pictures have gained a lot of attention, but is it the sort of attention her advisers had been hoping for? further attention was then given to the prime minister's dancing style with a discussion on the subject prompting ann channon to write... and anne—marie plant agreed... thank you for all your comments this week. if you want to share your opinions on bbc news and current affairs, or even appear on the programme, you can call us on... 0r e—mail... you can find us on twitter. and look at our website... that is all from us. we will be back to hear y

that e-mail was clearly addressed to the ceo. i wasn't supposed to be on that e-mail. so i wrote back to him and said, congressman, was i bcced on that prior e-mail? he said, yes, i accidentally replied all. now all of that goes to show and looking back it's all the more interesting. they have that kind of relationship where they clearly were in communication and collins even back then was defensive of that company. >> wow. so, joe, you have congressman collins, his son and the son's -- stay with me, the son's fiance's dad are the ones facing the charges now. but when you read through this indictment, there's a lot of references to coconspirators not named as defendants. how do prosecutors determine who gets charged, and would this mean that potentially family members could flip on family members? >> it could, which of course is the ultimate act of betrayal. we've seen lawyers turning on clients. family members turning on family members that's heart wrenching. you don't really know. we can make some educated guesses as to who these unindicted cospon spear tconspi. a lo

. >> how many days prior is the last e-mail check? >> four. a really big thing for me. >>> welcome back to "dateline" continues. advil is relief that's fast strength that lasts you'll ask... what pain? with advil dinner date...meeting his parents dinner date. why did i want a crest 3d white smile? so i used crest. crest 3d white removes... ...95% of surface stains in just 3 days... ...for a whiter smile... that will win them over. crest. healthy, beautiful smiles for life. you don't want to live with mom and dad forever, do you? i'm making smoothies! how do i check my credit score? credit karma. don't worry, it's free. credit karma. give yourself some credit. essential for the cactus, but maybe not for people with rheumatoid arthritis. because there are options. like an "unjection™". xeljanz xr. a once-daily pill for adults with moderate to severe ra for whom methotrexate did not work well enough. xeljanz xr can reduce pain, swelling and further joint damage, even without methotrexate. xeljanz xr can lower your ability to fight infections, inc

bush's e-mail because we had been told by the city attorney's office that an e-mail being circulated to all members may be deemed to be a public meeting of sorts. so can i please request the city attorney's office to comment on that and to train us as to what we should or should not be doing if one member is circulating an entire e-mail soliciting discussion on a topic to all members. >> this is mark blake, deputy city attorney. i think that the issue really is just kind of more of a process of it. it's okay for members to circulate commentary as long as it goes through your work or your secretary, and that that document be made available at your next meeting and it's a source of discussion at the meeting, but there should not be back and forth between the committee members about that item prior to the meeting. i think a direct communication in some ways promotes kind of a back and forth versus a i'm circulating this document, giving it to the city attorney to be distributed to you or at the next meeting. i think the question is if there is a circulation, and i'd like support on this